医疗保健中的人工智能算法:食品药品管理局的现行法规是否足够?

IF 1 4区 化学 Q4 BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS
Meghavi Mashar, Shreya Chawla, Fangyue Chen, Baker Lubwama, Kyle Patel, Mihir A Kelshiker, Patrik Bachtiger, Nicholas S Peters
{"title":"医疗保健中的人工智能算法:食品药品管理局的现行法规是否足够?","authors":"Meghavi Mashar, Shreya Chawla, Fangyue Chen, Baker Lubwama, Kyle Patel, Mihir A Kelshiker, Patrik Bachtiger, Nicholas S Peters","doi":"10.2196/42940","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Given the growing use of machine learning (ML) technologies in health care, regulatory bodies face unique challenges in governing their clinical use. Under the regulatory framework of the Food and Drug Administration, approved ML algorithms are practically locked, preventing their adaptation in the ever-changing clinical environment, defeating the unique adaptive trait of ML technology in learning from real-world feedback. At the same time, regulations must enforce a strict level of patient safety to mitigate risk at a systemic level. Given that ML algorithms often support, or at times replace, the role of medical professionals, we have proposed a novel regulatory pathway analogous to the regulation of medical professionals, encompassing the life cycle of an algorithm from inception, development to clinical implementation, and continual clinical adaptation. We then discuss in-depth technical and nontechnical challenges to its implementation and offer potential solutions to unleash the full potential of ML technology in health care while ensuring quality, equity, and safety. References for this article were identified through searches of PubMed with the search terms \"Artificial intelligence,\" \"Machine learning,\" and \"regulation\" from June 25, 2017, until June 25, 2022. Articles were also identified through searches of the reference list of the articles. Only papers published in English were reviewed. The final reference list was generated based on originality and relevance to the broad scope of this paper.</p>","PeriodicalId":16295,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Liquid Chromatography & Related Technologies","volume":"32 1","pages":"e42940"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11041443/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Artificial Intelligence Algorithms in Health Care: Is the Current Food and Drug Administration Regulation Sufficient?\",\"authors\":\"Meghavi Mashar, Shreya Chawla, Fangyue Chen, Baker Lubwama, Kyle Patel, Mihir A Kelshiker, Patrik Bachtiger, Nicholas S Peters\",\"doi\":\"10.2196/42940\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Given the growing use of machine learning (ML) technologies in health care, regulatory bodies face unique challenges in governing their clinical use. Under the regulatory framework of the Food and Drug Administration, approved ML algorithms are practically locked, preventing their adaptation in the ever-changing clinical environment, defeating the unique adaptive trait of ML technology in learning from real-world feedback. At the same time, regulations must enforce a strict level of patient safety to mitigate risk at a systemic level. Given that ML algorithms often support, or at times replace, the role of medical professionals, we have proposed a novel regulatory pathway analogous to the regulation of medical professionals, encompassing the life cycle of an algorithm from inception, development to clinical implementation, and continual clinical adaptation. We then discuss in-depth technical and nontechnical challenges to its implementation and offer potential solutions to unleash the full potential of ML technology in health care while ensuring quality, equity, and safety. References for this article were identified through searches of PubMed with the search terms \\\"Artificial intelligence,\\\" \\\"Machine learning,\\\" and \\\"regulation\\\" from June 25, 2017, until June 25, 2022. Articles were also identified through searches of the reference list of the articles. Only papers published in English were reviewed. The final reference list was generated based on originality and relevance to the broad scope of this paper.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16295,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Liquid Chromatography & Related Technologies\",\"volume\":\"32 1\",\"pages\":\"e42940\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11041443/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Liquid Chromatography & Related Technologies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2196/42940\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"化学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Liquid Chromatography & Related Technologies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2196/42940","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

鉴于机器学习(ML)技术在医疗保健领域的应用日益广泛,监管机构在管理其临床应用方面面临着独特的挑战。在美国食品和药物管理局的监管框架下,已获批准的 ML 算法实际上是被锁定的,无法适应不断变化的临床环境,从而破坏了 ML 技术从真实世界反馈中学习的独特适应性。与此同时,监管机构必须严格执行患者安全标准,从系统层面降低风险。鉴于人工智能算法通常支持或有时取代医疗专业人员的作用,我们提出了一种类似于医疗专业人员监管的新型监管途径,涵盖算法从开始、开发到临床实施以及持续临床适应的生命周期。然后,我们深入讨论了实施过程中遇到的技术和非技术挑战,并提出了潜在的解决方案,以充分释放 ML 技术在医疗保健领域的潜力,同时确保质量、公平和安全。从 2017 年 6 月 25 日到 2022 年 6 月 25 日,我们在 PubMed 上以 "人工智能"、"机器学习 "和 "监管 "为检索词检索了本文的参考文献。此外,还通过搜索文章的参考文献列表确定了相关文章。仅审查了以英文发表的论文。最终的参考文献列表是根据原创性和与本文广泛范围的相关性生成的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Artificial Intelligence Algorithms in Health Care: Is the Current Food and Drug Administration Regulation Sufficient?

Given the growing use of machine learning (ML) technologies in health care, regulatory bodies face unique challenges in governing their clinical use. Under the regulatory framework of the Food and Drug Administration, approved ML algorithms are practically locked, preventing their adaptation in the ever-changing clinical environment, defeating the unique adaptive trait of ML technology in learning from real-world feedback. At the same time, regulations must enforce a strict level of patient safety to mitigate risk at a systemic level. Given that ML algorithms often support, or at times replace, the role of medical professionals, we have proposed a novel regulatory pathway analogous to the regulation of medical professionals, encompassing the life cycle of an algorithm from inception, development to clinical implementation, and continual clinical adaptation. We then discuss in-depth technical and nontechnical challenges to its implementation and offer potential solutions to unleash the full potential of ML technology in health care while ensuring quality, equity, and safety. References for this article were identified through searches of PubMed with the search terms "Artificial intelligence," "Machine learning," and "regulation" from June 25, 2017, until June 25, 2022. Articles were also identified through searches of the reference list of the articles. Only papers published in English were reviewed. The final reference list was generated based on originality and relevance to the broad scope of this paper.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
29
审稿时长
4.9 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Liquid Chromatography & Related Technologies is an internationally acclaimed forum for fast publication of critical, peer reviewed manuscripts dealing with analytical, preparative and process scale liquid chromatography and all of its related technologies, including TLC, capillary electrophoresis, capillary electrochromatography, supercritical fluid chromatography and extraction, field-flow technologies, affinity, and much more. New separation methodologies are added when they are developed. Papers dealing with research and development results, as well as critical reviews of important technologies, are published in the Journal.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信