对IHME Covid-19模型的评估:2020年美国死亡人数

T. R. Robbins
{"title":"对IHME Covid-19模型的评估:2020年美国死亡人数","authors":"T. R. Robbins","doi":"10.33423/ajm.v21i2.4225","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The Covid-19 forecasting model published by the Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation (IHME) is one of the most influential, consequential, and controversial forecasting models ever published. The model has been widely cited by policy makers, but it has also been widely criticized. In this paper we make an objective, external review of the model. We evaluate the outputs of the model, how they changed, and how they compared to actual results. The model was subject to frequent adjustment that resulted in wide swings back and forth. The errors associated with the model were high and actual results fell inside the model's reported 95% confidence interval far less than 95% of the time. Overall, we find the accuracy of the model was poor, and the model 's predictions were unrealistically precise.","PeriodicalId":91998,"journal":{"name":"American journal of information management","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"An Assessment of the IHME Covid-19 Model: US Fatalities in 2020\",\"authors\":\"T. R. Robbins\",\"doi\":\"10.33423/ajm.v21i2.4225\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The Covid-19 forecasting model published by the Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation (IHME) is one of the most influential, consequential, and controversial forecasting models ever published. The model has been widely cited by policy makers, but it has also been widely criticized. In this paper we make an objective, external review of the model. We evaluate the outputs of the model, how they changed, and how they compared to actual results. The model was subject to frequent adjustment that resulted in wide swings back and forth. The errors associated with the model were high and actual results fell inside the model's reported 95% confidence interval far less than 95% of the time. Overall, we find the accuracy of the model was poor, and the model 's predictions were unrealistically precise.\",\"PeriodicalId\":91998,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"American journal of information management\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-06-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"American journal of information management\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.33423/ajm.v21i2.4225\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American journal of information management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33423/ajm.v21i2.4225","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

美国卫生计量与评估研究所(IHME)发布的新冠肺炎预测模型是迄今为止发表的最具影响力、最重要、最具争议的预测模型之一。该模式被政策制定者广泛引用,但也受到广泛批评。在本文中,我们对该模型进行了客观的外部审查。我们评估模型的输出,它们是如何变化的,以及它们与实际结果的比较。该模型受到频繁调整的影响,导致其前后大幅波动。与模型相关的误差很高,实际结果落在模型报告的95%置信区间内,远远低于95%的时间。总体而言,我们发现模型的准确性较差,模型的预测精度不切实际。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
An Assessment of the IHME Covid-19 Model: US Fatalities in 2020
The Covid-19 forecasting model published by the Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation (IHME) is one of the most influential, consequential, and controversial forecasting models ever published. The model has been widely cited by policy makers, but it has also been widely criticized. In this paper we make an objective, external review of the model. We evaluate the outputs of the model, how they changed, and how they compared to actual results. The model was subject to frequent adjustment that resulted in wide swings back and forth. The errors associated with the model were high and actual results fell inside the model's reported 95% confidence interval far less than 95% of the time. Overall, we find the accuracy of the model was poor, and the model 's predictions were unrealistically precise.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信