个性与作者身份:文学传统与现代

IF 0.1 0 LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS
I. Pankeev, N. G. Inshakova
{"title":"个性与作者身份:文学传统与现代","authors":"I. Pankeev, N. G. Inshakova","doi":"10.20339/phs.2-23.132","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A review of Justin Weir’s book “The Author as Hero: Self and Tradition in Bulgakov, Pasternak, and Nabokov” is presented in a broad literary context. This allowed to actualize the evaluation of the monograph, in which the reception of mise en abyme was studied more than twenty years ago. The author analyses the meaning of the key term, gives the variants of its modern interpretation, names the most important works, devoted to the metafunctionality as a phenomenon. The discussion of literary criticism positions of the author is followed by the evaluation of literary methods used in the book. The author emphasizes J. Weir’s pioneering contribution to the problematic of autoreferencing in the historical and literary perspective.","PeriodicalId":40803,"journal":{"name":"Filologicheskie Nauki-Nauchnye Doklady Vysshei Shkoly-Philological Sciences-Scientific Essays of Higher Education","volume":"6 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Personality and authorship: Literary tradition and modernity\",\"authors\":\"I. Pankeev, N. G. Inshakova\",\"doi\":\"10.20339/phs.2-23.132\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"A review of Justin Weir’s book “The Author as Hero: Self and Tradition in Bulgakov, Pasternak, and Nabokov” is presented in a broad literary context. This allowed to actualize the evaluation of the monograph, in which the reception of mise en abyme was studied more than twenty years ago. The author analyses the meaning of the key term, gives the variants of its modern interpretation, names the most important works, devoted to the metafunctionality as a phenomenon. The discussion of literary criticism positions of the author is followed by the evaluation of literary methods used in the book. The author emphasizes J. Weir’s pioneering contribution to the problematic of autoreferencing in the historical and literary perspective.\",\"PeriodicalId\":40803,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Filologicheskie Nauki-Nauchnye Doklady Vysshei Shkoly-Philological Sciences-Scientific Essays of Higher Education\",\"volume\":\"6 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Filologicheskie Nauki-Nauchnye Doklady Vysshei Shkoly-Philological Sciences-Scientific Essays of Higher Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.20339/phs.2-23.132\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Filologicheskie Nauki-Nauchnye Doklady Vysshei Shkoly-Philological Sciences-Scientific Essays of Higher Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.20339/phs.2-23.132","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

Justin Weir的书《作为英雄的作者:布尔加科夫、帕斯捷尔纳克和纳博科夫的自我与传统》在一个广泛的文学背景下被呈现。这使得专著的评价得以实现,其中对“美”的接受在二十多年前进行了研究。作者分析了这一关键术语的含义,给出了其现代解释的变体,并列举了将元功能作为一种现象来研究的最重要的著作。在讨论作者的文学批评立场之后,对书中使用的文学方法进行了评价。作者从历史和文学的角度强调了J. Weir对自动参考问题的开创性贡献。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Personality and authorship: Literary tradition and modernity
A review of Justin Weir’s book “The Author as Hero: Self and Tradition in Bulgakov, Pasternak, and Nabokov” is presented in a broad literary context. This allowed to actualize the evaluation of the monograph, in which the reception of mise en abyme was studied more than twenty years ago. The author analyses the meaning of the key term, gives the variants of its modern interpretation, names the most important works, devoted to the metafunctionality as a phenomenon. The discussion of literary criticism positions of the author is followed by the evaluation of literary methods used in the book. The author emphasizes J. Weir’s pioneering contribution to the problematic of autoreferencing in the historical and literary perspective.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
50.00%
发文量
100
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信