W. Hermawati, Ishelina Rosaira, R. Manalu, A. Santoso, Saut H Siahaan
{"title":"基于结果和影响的研究项目实施评估:以印度尼西亚公共研究所为例","authors":"W. Hermawati, Ishelina Rosaira, R. Manalu, A. Santoso, Saut H Siahaan","doi":"10.14203/STIPM.2018.132","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper relates to outcome and impact based evaluation (OIBE) of a research program implementation at an Indonesian public research institute (PRI) ‘A’. The major funding for PRIs in Indonesia comes from government. It is very essential therefore, for variuos parties including policy makers to be informed about meaningful and relevant evaluation of the outcome and impact of such PRIto the welfare of the people, to technology development and innovation, and to the policy improvements in significant ways. The mixed-method with good blend of qualitative and quantitative analysis is used in the case study of a competitive research program (CRP) of PRI ‘A’. The case study demonstrates that the outcomes and impacts of CRP are found in the form of economic, social, and environment improvements in the communities; managerial change and innovation of technology and process for SMEs as well as improved existing policies; and increased capabilities of researchers at PRI. Recommendations of this study is that PRI’A’ should improve their research management and policy, strengthen collaboration with firms, including more human resources mobility is required to facilitate research collaborations and co-production process, and to have clear guidelines and targets of outcomes and impacts for their research results.Keywords: outcome, impact, Public Research Institute, evaluation, Indonesia","PeriodicalId":31881,"journal":{"name":"STIPM STI Policy and Management Journal","volume":"21 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-07-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Outcome and Impact Based Evaluation of Research Program Implementation: A Case of Indonesian Public Research Institute\",\"authors\":\"W. Hermawati, Ishelina Rosaira, R. Manalu, A. Santoso, Saut H Siahaan\",\"doi\":\"10.14203/STIPM.2018.132\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper relates to outcome and impact based evaluation (OIBE) of a research program implementation at an Indonesian public research institute (PRI) ‘A’. The major funding for PRIs in Indonesia comes from government. It is very essential therefore, for variuos parties including policy makers to be informed about meaningful and relevant evaluation of the outcome and impact of such PRIto the welfare of the people, to technology development and innovation, and to the policy improvements in significant ways. The mixed-method with good blend of qualitative and quantitative analysis is used in the case study of a competitive research program (CRP) of PRI ‘A’. The case study demonstrates that the outcomes and impacts of CRP are found in the form of economic, social, and environment improvements in the communities; managerial change and innovation of technology and process for SMEs as well as improved existing policies; and increased capabilities of researchers at PRI. Recommendations of this study is that PRI’A’ should improve their research management and policy, strengthen collaboration with firms, including more human resources mobility is required to facilitate research collaborations and co-production process, and to have clear guidelines and targets of outcomes and impacts for their research results.Keywords: outcome, impact, Public Research Institute, evaluation, Indonesia\",\"PeriodicalId\":31881,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"STIPM STI Policy and Management Journal\",\"volume\":\"21 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-07-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"STIPM STI Policy and Management Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.14203/STIPM.2018.132\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"STIPM STI Policy and Management Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14203/STIPM.2018.132","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
摘要
本文涉及印度尼西亚公共研究机构(PRI)“a”的研究项目实施的结果和影响评估(OIBE)。印尼pri的主要资金来自政府。因此,对于包括政策制定者在内的各方来说,了解对这种PRIto对人民福利、技术发展和创新以及重大政策改进的结果和影响的有意义和相关的评估是非常重要的。将定性分析和定量分析相结合的混合分析方法应用于PRI ' a '竞争性研究项目(CRP)的案例研究。案例研究表明,CRP的结果和影响表现为社区的经济、社会和环境改善;中小企业的管理变革、技术和流程创新,以及改善现有政策;本研究的建议是PRI ' a应该改善他们的研究管理和政策,加强与公司的合作,包括需要更多的人力资源流动性来促进研究合作和共同生产过程,并为他们的研究成果和影响制定明确的指导方针和目标。关键词:结果、影响、公共研究所、评价、印度尼西亚
Outcome and Impact Based Evaluation of Research Program Implementation: A Case of Indonesian Public Research Institute
This paper relates to outcome and impact based evaluation (OIBE) of a research program implementation at an Indonesian public research institute (PRI) ‘A’. The major funding for PRIs in Indonesia comes from government. It is very essential therefore, for variuos parties including policy makers to be informed about meaningful and relevant evaluation of the outcome and impact of such PRIto the welfare of the people, to technology development and innovation, and to the policy improvements in significant ways. The mixed-method with good blend of qualitative and quantitative analysis is used in the case study of a competitive research program (CRP) of PRI ‘A’. The case study demonstrates that the outcomes and impacts of CRP are found in the form of economic, social, and environment improvements in the communities; managerial change and innovation of technology and process for SMEs as well as improved existing policies; and increased capabilities of researchers at PRI. Recommendations of this study is that PRI’A’ should improve their research management and policy, strengthen collaboration with firms, including more human resources mobility is required to facilitate research collaborations and co-production process, and to have clear guidelines and targets of outcomes and impacts for their research results.Keywords: outcome, impact, Public Research Institute, evaluation, Indonesia