对不愈合伤口的流行病学、病理生理学和治疗有什么新认识

Ulcers Pub Date : 2013-05-12 DOI:10.1155/2013/625934
H. Trøstrup, T. Bjarnsholt, K. Kirketerp-Møller, N. Høiby, C. Moser
{"title":"对不愈合伤口的流行病学、病理生理学和治疗有什么新认识","authors":"H. Trøstrup, T. Bjarnsholt, K. Kirketerp-Møller, N. Høiby, C. Moser","doi":"10.1155/2013/625934","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Chronic wounds are a growing socioeconomic problem in the western world. Knowledge on recalcitrant wounds relies on in vitro studies or clinical observations, and there is emerging evidence on the clinical impact of bacterial biofilm on skin healing. Chronic wounds are locked in the inflammatory state of wound healing, and there are multiple explanations for this arrest with the theory of exaggerated proteolysis as the most commonly accepted. Previously, there has not been enough focus on the different etiologies of chronic wounds compared to acute, healing wounds. There is an urgent need to group chronic wounds by its cause when searching for possible diagnostic or therapeutic targets. Good wound management should therefore consist of recognition of basic wound etiology, irrigation, and debridement in order to reduce microbial and necrotic load, frequently changed dressings, and appropriate antimicrobial and antibiofilm strategies based on precise diagnosis. Representative sampling is required for diagnosis and antimicrobial treatment of wounds. The present review aims at describing the impact of biofilm infections on wounds in relation to diagnosing, treatment strategies, including experimentally adjuvant approaches and animal models.","PeriodicalId":89514,"journal":{"name":"Ulcers","volume":"10 1","pages":"1-8"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-05-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"34","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"What Is New in the Understanding of Non Healing Wounds Epidemiology, Pathophysiology, and Therapies\",\"authors\":\"H. Trøstrup, T. Bjarnsholt, K. Kirketerp-Møller, N. Høiby, C. Moser\",\"doi\":\"10.1155/2013/625934\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Chronic wounds are a growing socioeconomic problem in the western world. Knowledge on recalcitrant wounds relies on in vitro studies or clinical observations, and there is emerging evidence on the clinical impact of bacterial biofilm on skin healing. Chronic wounds are locked in the inflammatory state of wound healing, and there are multiple explanations for this arrest with the theory of exaggerated proteolysis as the most commonly accepted. Previously, there has not been enough focus on the different etiologies of chronic wounds compared to acute, healing wounds. There is an urgent need to group chronic wounds by its cause when searching for possible diagnostic or therapeutic targets. Good wound management should therefore consist of recognition of basic wound etiology, irrigation, and debridement in order to reduce microbial and necrotic load, frequently changed dressings, and appropriate antimicrobial and antibiofilm strategies based on precise diagnosis. Representative sampling is required for diagnosis and antimicrobial treatment of wounds. The present review aims at describing the impact of biofilm infections on wounds in relation to diagnosing, treatment strategies, including experimentally adjuvant approaches and animal models.\",\"PeriodicalId\":89514,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ulcers\",\"volume\":\"10 1\",\"pages\":\"1-8\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2013-05-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"34\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ulcers\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1155/2013/625934\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ulcers","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/2013/625934","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 34

摘要

在西方世界,慢性伤口是一个日益严重的社会经济问题。关于顽固性伤口的知识依赖于体外研究或临床观察,并且有新的证据表明细菌生物膜对皮肤愈合的临床影响。慢性伤口被锁定在伤口愈合的炎症状态中,这种停滞有多种解释,其中最普遍接受的是夸大蛋白水解理论。以前,没有足够的关注不同病因的慢性伤口比较急性,愈合伤口。在寻找可能的诊断或治疗靶点时,迫切需要按病因对慢性伤口进行分组。因此,良好的伤口管理应包括识别基本的伤口病因,冲洗和清创以减少微生物和坏死负荷,经常更换敷料,以及基于精确诊断的适当抗菌和抗菌膜策略。伤口的诊断和抗菌治疗需要有代表性的取样。本综述旨在描述生物膜感染对伤口的诊断、治疗策略的影响,包括实验辅助方法和动物模型。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
What Is New in the Understanding of Non Healing Wounds Epidemiology, Pathophysiology, and Therapies
Chronic wounds are a growing socioeconomic problem in the western world. Knowledge on recalcitrant wounds relies on in vitro studies or clinical observations, and there is emerging evidence on the clinical impact of bacterial biofilm on skin healing. Chronic wounds are locked in the inflammatory state of wound healing, and there are multiple explanations for this arrest with the theory of exaggerated proteolysis as the most commonly accepted. Previously, there has not been enough focus on the different etiologies of chronic wounds compared to acute, healing wounds. There is an urgent need to group chronic wounds by its cause when searching for possible diagnostic or therapeutic targets. Good wound management should therefore consist of recognition of basic wound etiology, irrigation, and debridement in order to reduce microbial and necrotic load, frequently changed dressings, and appropriate antimicrobial and antibiofilm strategies based on precise diagnosis. Representative sampling is required for diagnosis and antimicrobial treatment of wounds. The present review aims at describing the impact of biofilm infections on wounds in relation to diagnosing, treatment strategies, including experimentally adjuvant approaches and animal models.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信