Vitek MS系统快速鉴定阳性血培养细菌种类的评价

K. Park, Sang-Ha Kim, J. Choi, Sunghyun Kim, Young-Kwon Kim, Young-Bin Yu
{"title":"Vitek MS系统快速鉴定阳性血培养细菌种类的评价","authors":"K. Park, Sang-Ha Kim, J. Choi, Sunghyun Kim, Young-Kwon Kim, Young-Bin Yu","doi":"10.15324/KJCLS.2017.49.4.407","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The aim of this study was to shorten the time required for subculture and bacterial identification and obtain a simple and rapid identification method for new test methods for bloodstream infections. The following results were obtained using a mass spectrometer. In Vitek 2, 208 (81.8%) cases were well-identified and 45 isolates were not identified in blood cultures. Among 208 cases, 146 (57.5%) were Gram positive bacteria and 108 (42.5%) were Gram negative bacteria. In total, 233 were identified to the species level and 21 were identified to the genus level. The identification error was found to be Propionibacterium acnes as Clostridium bifermentans. The accuracy of Enterobacteriaceae, glucose non-fermentative bacilli (GNFB), and staphylococci were 81/83 (97.6%), 12/15 (80.0%), and 72/85 (84.7%), respectively. The concordance rate of Vitek 2 and Vitek MS by the direct method was 81.8% and 45 isolates were not identified. Most of the unidentified bacteria were Gram positive bacteria (N=37). The Gram positive bacteria were streptococci (14), coagulase-negative staphylococci (CNS) (11), enterococci (3), Staphylococcus aureus (2), Micrococcus spp. (2), Bacillus spp. (2) and Actinomyces odontolyticus, Finegoldia magna, and Peptostreptococcus spp. The results reporting time was reduced to 24 ∼ 72 hours compared to the conventional method. The rate of identification of the aerobic and anaerobic cultures was similar, but the use of an anaerobic culture did not require a dissolution process, which could shorten the sample preparation time. These results suggest that the method of direct identification in blood cultures is very useful for the treatment of patients. In further studies, it might be necessary to further improve the method for identifying streptococci and CNS, which were lacking in accuracy in this study.","PeriodicalId":10080,"journal":{"name":"临床检验杂志","volume":"22 1","pages":"407-412"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"An Evaluation of Vitek MS System for Rapid Identification of Bacterial Species in Positive Blood Culture\",\"authors\":\"K. Park, Sang-Ha Kim, J. Choi, Sunghyun Kim, Young-Kwon Kim, Young-Bin Yu\",\"doi\":\"10.15324/KJCLS.2017.49.4.407\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The aim of this study was to shorten the time required for subculture and bacterial identification and obtain a simple and rapid identification method for new test methods for bloodstream infections. The following results were obtained using a mass spectrometer. In Vitek 2, 208 (81.8%) cases were well-identified and 45 isolates were not identified in blood cultures. Among 208 cases, 146 (57.5%) were Gram positive bacteria and 108 (42.5%) were Gram negative bacteria. In total, 233 were identified to the species level and 21 were identified to the genus level. The identification error was found to be Propionibacterium acnes as Clostridium bifermentans. The accuracy of Enterobacteriaceae, glucose non-fermentative bacilli (GNFB), and staphylococci were 81/83 (97.6%), 12/15 (80.0%), and 72/85 (84.7%), respectively. The concordance rate of Vitek 2 and Vitek MS by the direct method was 81.8% and 45 isolates were not identified. Most of the unidentified bacteria were Gram positive bacteria (N=37). The Gram positive bacteria were streptococci (14), coagulase-negative staphylococci (CNS) (11), enterococci (3), Staphylococcus aureus (2), Micrococcus spp. (2), Bacillus spp. (2) and Actinomyces odontolyticus, Finegoldia magna, and Peptostreptococcus spp. The results reporting time was reduced to 24 ∼ 72 hours compared to the conventional method. The rate of identification of the aerobic and anaerobic cultures was similar, but the use of an anaerobic culture did not require a dissolution process, which could shorten the sample preparation time. These results suggest that the method of direct identification in blood cultures is very useful for the treatment of patients. In further studies, it might be necessary to further improve the method for identifying streptococci and CNS, which were lacking in accuracy in this study.\",\"PeriodicalId\":10080,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"临床检验杂志\",\"volume\":\"22 1\",\"pages\":\"407-412\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-12-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"临床检验杂志\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.15324/KJCLS.2017.49.4.407\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"临床检验杂志","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15324/KJCLS.2017.49.4.407","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究旨在缩短传代培养和细菌鉴定所需的时间,为血液感染的新检测方法提供一种简单快速的鉴定方法。下面是用质谱仪得到的结果。在Vitek 2中,208例(81.8%)病例在血培养中得到良好鉴定,45例未被鉴定。208例中革兰阳性菌146例(57.5%),革兰阴性菌108例(42.5%)。鉴定到种水平的有233种,鉴定到属水平的有21种。鉴定错误为痤疮丙酸杆菌,为双歧梭菌。肠杆菌科、葡萄糖非发酵杆菌(GNFB)和葡萄球菌的准确率分别为81/83(97.6%)、12/15(80.0%)和72/85(84.7%)。直接法与MS的一致性为81.8%,未检出45株。未鉴定细菌以革兰氏阳性菌居多(N=37)。革兰氏阳性菌为链球菌(14株)、凝固酶阴性葡萄球菌(CNS)(11株)、肠球菌(3株)、金黄色葡萄球菌(2株)、微球菌(2株)、芽孢杆菌(2株)、溶牙放线菌、大细球菌和胃链球菌(2株),结果报告时间较常规方法缩短至24 ~ 72小时。好氧培养物和厌氧培养物的鉴定率相似,但厌氧培养物不需要溶解过程,可以缩短样品制备时间。这些结果表明,在血培养中直接鉴定的方法对患者的治疗是非常有用的。在进一步的研究中,可能需要进一步改进本研究中准确性不足的链球菌和中枢神经系统的鉴定方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
An Evaluation of Vitek MS System for Rapid Identification of Bacterial Species in Positive Blood Culture
The aim of this study was to shorten the time required for subculture and bacterial identification and obtain a simple and rapid identification method for new test methods for bloodstream infections. The following results were obtained using a mass spectrometer. In Vitek 2, 208 (81.8%) cases were well-identified and 45 isolates were not identified in blood cultures. Among 208 cases, 146 (57.5%) were Gram positive bacteria and 108 (42.5%) were Gram negative bacteria. In total, 233 were identified to the species level and 21 were identified to the genus level. The identification error was found to be Propionibacterium acnes as Clostridium bifermentans. The accuracy of Enterobacteriaceae, glucose non-fermentative bacilli (GNFB), and staphylococci were 81/83 (97.6%), 12/15 (80.0%), and 72/85 (84.7%), respectively. The concordance rate of Vitek 2 and Vitek MS by the direct method was 81.8% and 45 isolates were not identified. Most of the unidentified bacteria were Gram positive bacteria (N=37). The Gram positive bacteria were streptococci (14), coagulase-negative staphylococci (CNS) (11), enterococci (3), Staphylococcus aureus (2), Micrococcus spp. (2), Bacillus spp. (2) and Actinomyces odontolyticus, Finegoldia magna, and Peptostreptococcus spp. The results reporting time was reduced to 24 ∼ 72 hours compared to the conventional method. The rate of identification of the aerobic and anaerobic cultures was similar, but the use of an anaerobic culture did not require a dissolution process, which could shorten the sample preparation time. These results suggest that the method of direct identification in blood cultures is very useful for the treatment of patients. In further studies, it might be necessary to further improve the method for identifying streptococci and CNS, which were lacking in accuracy in this study.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
10649
期刊介绍:
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信