在英语教育项目的学位研讨会上,作者如何处理教师提供的书面评论(ce)

IF 0.1 4区 社会学 0 HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
M. Ladino, María Soledad De La Ho, Katia Sáez-Carrillo
{"title":"在英语教育项目的学位研讨会上,作者如何处理教师提供的书面评论(ce)","authors":"M. Ladino, María Soledad De La Ho, Katia Sáez-Carrillo","doi":"10.32735/S0718-2201202000051849","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We, university teachers, invest most of our time in offering written or oral feedback to the student’s assignments. However, one of the issues is to know what students do with these comments. Do they follow them? Do they omit them? The aim of this research is to present the results of the analysis carried out about the actions that students perform based on 434 written comments provided by 2 supervisors teachers in total of 2 drafts produced in the development of the final undergraduate research. To analyze the actions carried out by the writers from the feedback received,  Faigley and  Witte (1981) taxonomy was adapted. These actions were analyzed in terms of adoption (addition, substitution, permutation, consolidation and elimination), non adoption or suppression of the suggestions offered to improve the text. The results show that students adopt almost all the suggestions offered. Basically, what they do the most is to consolidate and substitute. Likewise, it is possible to report that there is a relation between the way comments are offered and the actions the writers carry out. While, this is a case study, it is interesting to notice a certain relation between offering order and the text addition and questions with the text modifications.","PeriodicalId":43217,"journal":{"name":"Alpha-Revista de Artes Letras y Filosofia","volume":"31 1","pages":"109-123"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Qué hacen los escritores con los comentarios escritos (ce) que ofrecen los profesores a los seminarios de grado en Programas de Pedagogía en Inglés\",\"authors\":\"M. Ladino, María Soledad De La Ho, Katia Sáez-Carrillo\",\"doi\":\"10.32735/S0718-2201202000051849\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"We, university teachers, invest most of our time in offering written or oral feedback to the student’s assignments. However, one of the issues is to know what students do with these comments. Do they follow them? Do they omit them? The aim of this research is to present the results of the analysis carried out about the actions that students perform based on 434 written comments provided by 2 supervisors teachers in total of 2 drafts produced in the development of the final undergraduate research. To analyze the actions carried out by the writers from the feedback received,  Faigley and  Witte (1981) taxonomy was adapted. These actions were analyzed in terms of adoption (addition, substitution, permutation, consolidation and elimination), non adoption or suppression of the suggestions offered to improve the text. The results show that students adopt almost all the suggestions offered. Basically, what they do the most is to consolidate and substitute. Likewise, it is possible to report that there is a relation between the way comments are offered and the actions the writers carry out. While, this is a case study, it is interesting to notice a certain relation between offering order and the text addition and questions with the text modifications.\",\"PeriodicalId\":43217,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Alpha-Revista de Artes Letras y Filosofia\",\"volume\":\"31 1\",\"pages\":\"109-123\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-12-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Alpha-Revista de Artes Letras y Filosofia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.32735/S0718-2201202000051849\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Alpha-Revista de Artes Letras y Filosofia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.32735/S0718-2201202000051849","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

作为大学教师,我们大部分时间都花在给学生的作业提供书面或口头反馈上。然而,其中一个问题是要知道学生如何处理这些评论。他们会遵守吗?他们省略了吗?本研究的目的是根据2名导师和教师提供的434份书面评论,在最终的本科研究的发展过程中产生的2份草稿,对学生的行为进行分析的结果。为了从收到的反馈中分析作者所采取的行动,采用了Faigley和Witte(1981)的分类法。从采纳(增加、替代、排列、合并和消除)、不采纳或抑制提出的改进案文的建议等方面对这些行动进行了分析。结果表明,学生几乎采纳了所有的建议。基本上,他们做得最多的是巩固和替代。同样地,我们也可以报告说,在提供评论的方式和作者所采取的行动之间存在某种关系。虽然这是一个案例研究,但有趣的是,我们注意到提供订单与文本添加以及问题与文本修改之间的某种关系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Qué hacen los escritores con los comentarios escritos (ce) que ofrecen los profesores a los seminarios de grado en Programas de Pedagogía en Inglés
We, university teachers, invest most of our time in offering written or oral feedback to the student’s assignments. However, one of the issues is to know what students do with these comments. Do they follow them? Do they omit them? The aim of this research is to present the results of the analysis carried out about the actions that students perform based on 434 written comments provided by 2 supervisors teachers in total of 2 drafts produced in the development of the final undergraduate research. To analyze the actions carried out by the writers from the feedback received,  Faigley and  Witte (1981) taxonomy was adapted. These actions were analyzed in terms of adoption (addition, substitution, permutation, consolidation and elimination), non adoption or suppression of the suggestions offered to improve the text. The results show that students adopt almost all the suggestions offered. Basically, what they do the most is to consolidate and substitute. Likewise, it is possible to report that there is a relation between the way comments are offered and the actions the writers carry out. While, this is a case study, it is interesting to notice a certain relation between offering order and the text addition and questions with the text modifications.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Alpha-Revista de Artes Letras y Filosofia
Alpha-Revista de Artes Letras y Filosofia HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
14
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信