采用主动侧杆的低速直升机触觉避障系统设计

C. Walko, M. Müllhäuser
{"title":"采用主动侧杆的低速直升机触觉避障系统设计","authors":"C. Walko, M. Müllhäuser","doi":"10.1017/aer.2023.48","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Helicopter collisions with obstacles are one of the most frequent and most devastating causes of accidents. To avoid these collisions in low-speed operations a “haptic ticker” cue in form of repetitive impulses as a force feedback was designed for an active sidestick. Various design questions were examined in pilot campaigns using a full flight simulator and four test scenarios. As a result, the pilots always knew which distance-based hazard area (green, yellow, red) they were in. Furthermore, the ticker is disruptive and roughly reduces the handling qualities from Level 1 to Level 2. It is therefore primarily activated as a hazard warning and not as a main input to control the distance. As a warning cue the ticker was evaluated as non-disturbing. The force threshold to detect the direction of a tick was determined. With tick strengths above this threshold, the direction is still not recognised at all in around 2% of the ticks. For the remaining ticks, the accuracy with which the direction is recognised is about 15°. In the fourth scenario, obstacles were moved towards the hovering helicopter, potentially forcing a collision. However, with the ticker a collision occurred in less than 4% of the cases, instead of 84% without the ticker. The ticker was rated as very intuitive and worth recommending. When asked how many accidents of this kind could be prevented with this ticker, all five pilots independently estimated 75%.","PeriodicalId":22567,"journal":{"name":"The Aeronautical Journal (1968)","volume":"40 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Design of a haptic obstacle avoidance for low-speed helicopter operations using active sidesticks\",\"authors\":\"C. Walko, M. Müllhäuser\",\"doi\":\"10.1017/aer.2023.48\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n Helicopter collisions with obstacles are one of the most frequent and most devastating causes of accidents. To avoid these collisions in low-speed operations a “haptic ticker” cue in form of repetitive impulses as a force feedback was designed for an active sidestick. Various design questions were examined in pilot campaigns using a full flight simulator and four test scenarios. As a result, the pilots always knew which distance-based hazard area (green, yellow, red) they were in. Furthermore, the ticker is disruptive and roughly reduces the handling qualities from Level 1 to Level 2. It is therefore primarily activated as a hazard warning and not as a main input to control the distance. As a warning cue the ticker was evaluated as non-disturbing. The force threshold to detect the direction of a tick was determined. With tick strengths above this threshold, the direction is still not recognised at all in around 2% of the ticks. For the remaining ticks, the accuracy with which the direction is recognised is about 15°. In the fourth scenario, obstacles were moved towards the hovering helicopter, potentially forcing a collision. However, with the ticker a collision occurred in less than 4% of the cases, instead of 84% without the ticker. The ticker was rated as very intuitive and worth recommending. When asked how many accidents of this kind could be prevented with this ticker, all five pilots independently estimated 75%.\",\"PeriodicalId\":22567,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Aeronautical Journal (1968)\",\"volume\":\"40 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-06-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Aeronautical Journal (1968)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1017/aer.2023.48\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Aeronautical Journal (1968)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/aer.2023.48","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

直升机与障碍物的碰撞是最常见和最具破坏性的事故原因之一。为了避免低速操作时的碰撞,设计了一种以重复脉冲形式作为力反馈的“触觉指示器”提示,用于主动侧杆。各种设计问题在使用全飞行模拟器和四个测试场景的试点活动中进行了检查。因此,飞行员总是知道他们在哪个基于距离的危险区域(绿色,黄色,红色)。此外,报价器是破坏性的,并且大致上将处理质量从1级降低到2级。因此,它主要是作为危险警告而不是作为控制距离的主要输入而激活的。作为一个警告提示,该股票被评估为无干扰。确定了检测tick方向的力阈值。尽管蜱虫强度高于这个阈值,但仍有大约2%的蜱虫无法识别方向。对于剩余的刻度,识别方向的精度约为15°。在第四个场景中,障碍物被移动到悬停的直升机上,可能会导致碰撞。然而,有了自动提示器,碰撞发生的几率不到4%,而没有自动提示器,碰撞发生的几率为84%。该报价器被评为非常直观,值得推荐。当被问及有多少此类事故可以通过这种自动报警系统来避免时,所有五名飞行员都独立估计了75%。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Design of a haptic obstacle avoidance for low-speed helicopter operations using active sidesticks
Helicopter collisions with obstacles are one of the most frequent and most devastating causes of accidents. To avoid these collisions in low-speed operations a “haptic ticker” cue in form of repetitive impulses as a force feedback was designed for an active sidestick. Various design questions were examined in pilot campaigns using a full flight simulator and four test scenarios. As a result, the pilots always knew which distance-based hazard area (green, yellow, red) they were in. Furthermore, the ticker is disruptive and roughly reduces the handling qualities from Level 1 to Level 2. It is therefore primarily activated as a hazard warning and not as a main input to control the distance. As a warning cue the ticker was evaluated as non-disturbing. The force threshold to detect the direction of a tick was determined. With tick strengths above this threshold, the direction is still not recognised at all in around 2% of the ticks. For the remaining ticks, the accuracy with which the direction is recognised is about 15°. In the fourth scenario, obstacles were moved towards the hovering helicopter, potentially forcing a collision. However, with the ticker a collision occurred in less than 4% of the cases, instead of 84% without the ticker. The ticker was rated as very intuitive and worth recommending. When asked how many accidents of this kind could be prevented with this ticker, all five pilots independently estimated 75%.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信