“教师数据素养实践”与“教学文档”相遇:范围审查

IF 2.7 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Mi Song Kim, Fengcaho Yu
{"title":"“教师数据素养实践”与“教学文档”相遇:范围审查","authors":"Mi Song Kim, Fengcaho Yu","doi":"10.1002/rev3.3414","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In teacher education, there is a growing need for teachers to become data literate by collecting a variety of data on student learning to assess student progress and inform instruction. Research on pedagogical documentation in education, in particular early childhood education, has been undertaken to make students' learning visible by documenting multiple forms of student data. Although the notion of pedagogical documentation could be broadened in teacher data literacies practice, little is known about teacher data literacies practice in implementing pedagogical documentation. To fill this research gap, we performed a scoping review of the studies to investigate the landscape of teacher data literacies practice with pedagogical documentation published from 2000 to 2020. Our scoping review employed Arksey and O'Malley's methodological framework and identified 62 studies in our review. Our analysis provided an overview of the existing studies on teacher data literacies practice with pedagogical documentation. The implications of its findings were discussed.\nDespite the increased demand for teachers to make data‐driven and evidence‐based decisions in teaching, to our knowledge this is the first review of teacher data literacies in implementing pedagogical documentation.Our scoping review identifies knowledge gaps in teachers' pedagogical documentation in diverse K‐12 settings, particularly in developing countries.It also calls for more classroom‐based research on teacher data literacies practice in implementing pedagogical documentation and the need to further understand the relationship between teacher data literacies and pedagogical documentation. These implications are relevant for both educational researchers and teachers.\n","PeriodicalId":45076,"journal":{"name":"Review of Education","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"‘Teacher data literacies practice’ meets ‘pedagogical documentation’: A scoping review\",\"authors\":\"Mi Song Kim, Fengcaho Yu\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/rev3.3414\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In teacher education, there is a growing need for teachers to become data literate by collecting a variety of data on student learning to assess student progress and inform instruction. Research on pedagogical documentation in education, in particular early childhood education, has been undertaken to make students' learning visible by documenting multiple forms of student data. Although the notion of pedagogical documentation could be broadened in teacher data literacies practice, little is known about teacher data literacies practice in implementing pedagogical documentation. To fill this research gap, we performed a scoping review of the studies to investigate the landscape of teacher data literacies practice with pedagogical documentation published from 2000 to 2020. Our scoping review employed Arksey and O'Malley's methodological framework and identified 62 studies in our review. Our analysis provided an overview of the existing studies on teacher data literacies practice with pedagogical documentation. The implications of its findings were discussed.\\nDespite the increased demand for teachers to make data‐driven and evidence‐based decisions in teaching, to our knowledge this is the first review of teacher data literacies in implementing pedagogical documentation.Our scoping review identifies knowledge gaps in teachers' pedagogical documentation in diverse K‐12 settings, particularly in developing countries.It also calls for more classroom‐based research on teacher data literacies practice in implementing pedagogical documentation and the need to further understand the relationship between teacher data literacies and pedagogical documentation. These implications are relevant for both educational researchers and teachers.\\n\",\"PeriodicalId\":45076,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Review of Education\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Review of Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/rev3.3414\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Review of Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/rev3.3414","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在教师教育方面,越来越需要教师具备数据素养,通过收集各种关于学生学习的数据来评估学生的进步并为教学提供信息。已经对教育,特别是幼儿教育中的教学文件进行了研究,以便通过记录多种形式的学生数据,使学生的学习情况可见。虽然教学文件的概念可以在教师数据素养实践中得到扩展,但在实施教学文件方面,对教师数据素养实践知之甚少。为了填补这一研究空白,我们对研究进行了范围审查,以调查2000年至2020年出版的教学文献中教师数据素养实践的前景。我们的范围综述采用了Arksey和O'Malley的方法框架,并在我们的综述中确定了62项研究。我们的分析概述了现有的关于教师数据素养实践的教学文献研究。讨论了调查结果的含义。尽管对教师在教学中做出数据驱动和基于证据的决策的需求增加,但据我们所知,这是对教师在实施教学文件方面的数据素养的首次审查。我们的范围审查确定了在不同的K - 12背景下,特别是在发展中国家,教师教学文献中的知识差距。它还呼吁对教师数据素养在实施教学文件方面的实践进行更多基于课堂的研究,并需要进一步了解教师数据素养与教学文件之间的关系。这些启示对教育研究者和教师都有意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
‘Teacher data literacies practice’ meets ‘pedagogical documentation’: A scoping review
In teacher education, there is a growing need for teachers to become data literate by collecting a variety of data on student learning to assess student progress and inform instruction. Research on pedagogical documentation in education, in particular early childhood education, has been undertaken to make students' learning visible by documenting multiple forms of student data. Although the notion of pedagogical documentation could be broadened in teacher data literacies practice, little is known about teacher data literacies practice in implementing pedagogical documentation. To fill this research gap, we performed a scoping review of the studies to investigate the landscape of teacher data literacies practice with pedagogical documentation published from 2000 to 2020. Our scoping review employed Arksey and O'Malley's methodological framework and identified 62 studies in our review. Our analysis provided an overview of the existing studies on teacher data literacies practice with pedagogical documentation. The implications of its findings were discussed. Despite the increased demand for teachers to make data‐driven and evidence‐based decisions in teaching, to our knowledge this is the first review of teacher data literacies in implementing pedagogical documentation.Our scoping review identifies knowledge gaps in teachers' pedagogical documentation in diverse K‐12 settings, particularly in developing countries.It also calls for more classroom‐based research on teacher data literacies practice in implementing pedagogical documentation and the need to further understand the relationship between teacher data literacies and pedagogical documentation. These implications are relevant for both educational researchers and teachers.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Review of Education
Review of Education EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
8.30%
发文量
63
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信