{"title":"初步数据用于评估仅使用白天位置估计雌性白尾鹿出生季节栖息地范围的准确性","authors":"S. Barber-Meyer, L. Mech","doi":"10.2461/WBP.2014.10.8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Because many white-tailed deer (Odocoileus virginianus) home-range and habitat-use studies rely only on daytime radio-tracking data, we were interested in whether diurnal data sufficiently represented diel home ranges. We analyzed home-range and core-use size and overlap of 8 adult-female Global-Positioning-System-collared deer during May and June 2001 and 2002 in the Superior National Forest, Minnesota, USA. We used two traditional means of analysis: minimum-convex polygons (MCP) and fixed kernels (95% FK, home range and 50% FK, core use) and two methods to partition day and night location data: (1) daytime = 0800-2000 h versus nighttime = 2000-0800 h and (2) sunup versus sundown. We found no statistical difference in size of home-range and core-use areas across day and night comparisons; however, approximately 30% of night-range areas on average were not accounted for using daytime locations, with even greater differences between core-use areas (on average approximately 50%). We conclude that diurnal data do not adequately describe diel yearling and adult-female-deer, home-range size and location during May and June, especially core-use estimation (50% FK). In analysing both yearling and adult-female-deer location data during a period that includes parturition we were studying a worst-case scenario. We suggest research to determine (1) if our findings hold under more-ideal circumstances (e.g., all adult deer, exclusive of the parturition period), (2) if our conclusions generalize under other conditions, and (3) if habitat-use conclusions are affected by the incomplete overlap between diurnal and diel data.","PeriodicalId":89522,"journal":{"name":"Wildlife biology in practice (Online)","volume":"14 1","pages":"62-68"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-07-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Preliminary Data Used to Assess the Accuracy of Estimating Female White-Tailed Deer Diel Birthing-Season Home Ranges Using Only Daytime Locations\",\"authors\":\"S. Barber-Meyer, L. Mech\",\"doi\":\"10.2461/WBP.2014.10.8\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Because many white-tailed deer (Odocoileus virginianus) home-range and habitat-use studies rely only on daytime radio-tracking data, we were interested in whether diurnal data sufficiently represented diel home ranges. We analyzed home-range and core-use size and overlap of 8 adult-female Global-Positioning-System-collared deer during May and June 2001 and 2002 in the Superior National Forest, Minnesota, USA. We used two traditional means of analysis: minimum-convex polygons (MCP) and fixed kernels (95% FK, home range and 50% FK, core use) and two methods to partition day and night location data: (1) daytime = 0800-2000 h versus nighttime = 2000-0800 h and (2) sunup versus sundown. We found no statistical difference in size of home-range and core-use areas across day and night comparisons; however, approximately 30% of night-range areas on average were not accounted for using daytime locations, with even greater differences between core-use areas (on average approximately 50%). We conclude that diurnal data do not adequately describe diel yearling and adult-female-deer, home-range size and location during May and June, especially core-use estimation (50% FK). In analysing both yearling and adult-female-deer location data during a period that includes parturition we were studying a worst-case scenario. We suggest research to determine (1) if our findings hold under more-ideal circumstances (e.g., all adult deer, exclusive of the parturition period), (2) if our conclusions generalize under other conditions, and (3) if habitat-use conclusions are affected by the incomplete overlap between diurnal and diel data.\",\"PeriodicalId\":89522,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Wildlife biology in practice (Online)\",\"volume\":\"14 1\",\"pages\":\"62-68\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2014-07-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Wildlife biology in practice (Online)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2461/WBP.2014.10.8\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Wildlife biology in practice (Online)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2461/WBP.2014.10.8","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Preliminary Data Used to Assess the Accuracy of Estimating Female White-Tailed Deer Diel Birthing-Season Home Ranges Using Only Daytime Locations
Because many white-tailed deer (Odocoileus virginianus) home-range and habitat-use studies rely only on daytime radio-tracking data, we were interested in whether diurnal data sufficiently represented diel home ranges. We analyzed home-range and core-use size and overlap of 8 adult-female Global-Positioning-System-collared deer during May and June 2001 and 2002 in the Superior National Forest, Minnesota, USA. We used two traditional means of analysis: minimum-convex polygons (MCP) and fixed kernels (95% FK, home range and 50% FK, core use) and two methods to partition day and night location data: (1) daytime = 0800-2000 h versus nighttime = 2000-0800 h and (2) sunup versus sundown. We found no statistical difference in size of home-range and core-use areas across day and night comparisons; however, approximately 30% of night-range areas on average were not accounted for using daytime locations, with even greater differences between core-use areas (on average approximately 50%). We conclude that diurnal data do not adequately describe diel yearling and adult-female-deer, home-range size and location during May and June, especially core-use estimation (50% FK). In analysing both yearling and adult-female-deer location data during a period that includes parturition we were studying a worst-case scenario. We suggest research to determine (1) if our findings hold under more-ideal circumstances (e.g., all adult deer, exclusive of the parturition period), (2) if our conclusions generalize under other conditions, and (3) if habitat-use conclusions are affected by the incomplete overlap between diurnal and diel data.