克服辅助参与的障碍:社区优先的专业发展方法

Q3 Mathematics
Kirk Weller, Anil Venkatesh, E. Militzer
{"title":"克服辅助参与的障碍:社区优先的专业发展方法","authors":"Kirk Weller, Anil Venkatesh, E. Militzer","doi":"10.1080/10511970.2023.2167250","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We present a model for professional development of instructional faculty. Though initially conceived for accreditation compliance as a credentialing process for adjunct faculty, this project led to increases in participants’ collaboration on lesson design, investment in curricular decisions, and adoption of active learning methods. In this paper, we identify five barriers that initially impeded these outcomes: Time, Isolation, Connection Between Content and Pedagogy, Change, and Risk-Taking. Through extensive coding of discussion board posts and participant interviews, we show that participants initially encountered these barriers but largely overcame them by the end of the project.","PeriodicalId":39375,"journal":{"name":"PRIMUS","volume":"83 1","pages":"729 - 743"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Overcoming Barriers to Adjunct Engagement: A Community-First Approach to Professional Development\",\"authors\":\"Kirk Weller, Anil Venkatesh, E. Militzer\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/10511970.2023.2167250\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"We present a model for professional development of instructional faculty. Though initially conceived for accreditation compliance as a credentialing process for adjunct faculty, this project led to increases in participants’ collaboration on lesson design, investment in curricular decisions, and adoption of active learning methods. In this paper, we identify five barriers that initially impeded these outcomes: Time, Isolation, Connection Between Content and Pedagogy, Change, and Risk-Taking. Through extensive coding of discussion board posts and participant interviews, we show that participants initially encountered these barriers but largely overcame them by the end of the project.\",\"PeriodicalId\":39375,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"PRIMUS\",\"volume\":\"83 1\",\"pages\":\"729 - 743\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"PRIMUS\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/10511970.2023.2167250\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Mathematics\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PRIMUS","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10511970.2023.2167250","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Mathematics","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

提出了一种教学教师专业发展模式。虽然最初的设想是将认证合规作为兼职教师的资格认证过程,但该项目导致参与者在课程设计、课程决策投资和主动学习方法采用方面的合作增加。在本文中,我们确定了最初阻碍这些结果的五个障碍:时间、隔离、内容与教学法之间的联系、变化和冒险。通过对讨论板帖子和参与者访谈的大量编码,我们发现参与者最初遇到了这些障碍,但在项目结束时大部分都克服了这些障碍。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Overcoming Barriers to Adjunct Engagement: A Community-First Approach to Professional Development
We present a model for professional development of instructional faculty. Though initially conceived for accreditation compliance as a credentialing process for adjunct faculty, this project led to increases in participants’ collaboration on lesson design, investment in curricular decisions, and adoption of active learning methods. In this paper, we identify five barriers that initially impeded these outcomes: Time, Isolation, Connection Between Content and Pedagogy, Change, and Risk-Taking. Through extensive coding of discussion board posts and participant interviews, we show that participants initially encountered these barriers but largely overcame them by the end of the project.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
PRIMUS
PRIMUS Social Sciences-Education
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
42
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信