{"title":"忏悔的分歧、交叉忏悔的联系和犹太人的反应:以色列的Menasseh和Daniel Levi de Barrios论de auxiliis和Dordt","authors":"Sina Rauschenbach","doi":"10.5117/SR2021.1.001.RAUS","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Studies in the Jewish reception of Christian theological discussions beyond the proper field of polemics are rare and only in their beginnings. Until now, scholars have often argued that Portuguese Jews discussed Christian concepts of divine foreknowledge and human free will because they were either struggling with their own Christian past or sought to help their ‘New Jewish’ coreligionists to turn into reliable members of the Amsterdam Sephardic community. This article uses the example of the Catholic Controversia de auxiliis, and the Protestant fight over Predestination before and after the Synod of Dordt (1618-1619) to argue that Portuguese Jews such as Menasseh ben Israel and Daniel Levi de Barrios recognised the cross-confessional dimension of the Christian debates on divine grace; they used their Iberian background and knowledge to order and explain what they observed; and they displayed their position as outsiders to deconstruct religious boundaries, imagine alternative religious landscapes, and finally re-insert themselves into their newly created religious maps and orders. The argument is based on a close reading of one chapter of the last volume of Menasseh ben Israel’s Conciliador (1651) as well as Daniel Levi de Barrios’s poem Libre Alvedrio y Harmonia del Cuerpo, por disposicion del alma (1680).","PeriodicalId":53197,"journal":{"name":"STUDIA ROSENTHALIANA","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Confessional Divides, Cross-Confessional Connections, and Jewish Responses: Menasseh ben Israel and Daniel Levi de Barrios on De auxiliis and Dordt\",\"authors\":\"Sina Rauschenbach\",\"doi\":\"10.5117/SR2021.1.001.RAUS\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract Studies in the Jewish reception of Christian theological discussions beyond the proper field of polemics are rare and only in their beginnings. Until now, scholars have often argued that Portuguese Jews discussed Christian concepts of divine foreknowledge and human free will because they were either struggling with their own Christian past or sought to help their ‘New Jewish’ coreligionists to turn into reliable members of the Amsterdam Sephardic community. This article uses the example of the Catholic Controversia de auxiliis, and the Protestant fight over Predestination before and after the Synod of Dordt (1618-1619) to argue that Portuguese Jews such as Menasseh ben Israel and Daniel Levi de Barrios recognised the cross-confessional dimension of the Christian debates on divine grace; they used their Iberian background and knowledge to order and explain what they observed; and they displayed their position as outsiders to deconstruct religious boundaries, imagine alternative religious landscapes, and finally re-insert themselves into their newly created religious maps and orders. The argument is based on a close reading of one chapter of the last volume of Menasseh ben Israel’s Conciliador (1651) as well as Daniel Levi de Barrios’s poem Libre Alvedrio y Harmonia del Cuerpo, por disposicion del alma (1680).\",\"PeriodicalId\":53197,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"STUDIA ROSENTHALIANA\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"STUDIA ROSENTHALIANA\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5117/SR2021.1.001.RAUS\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"STUDIA ROSENTHALIANA","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5117/SR2021.1.001.RAUS","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
研究犹太人接受基督教神学讨论超出适当的论战领域是罕见的,只是在他们的开始。到目前为止,学者们经常认为葡萄牙犹太人讨论基督教的神圣预知和人类自由意志的概念,因为他们要么是在与自己的基督教历史作斗争,要么是在寻求帮助他们的“新犹太人”同教者成为阿姆斯特丹西班牙系犹太人社区的可靠成员。本文以天主教的辅助争论(arguma de auxiliis)和新教在多特主教会议(1618-1619)前后对宿命论的争论为例,论证葡萄牙犹太人,如Menasseh ben Israel和Daniel Levi de Barrios,认识到基督教关于神圣恩典的辩论的跨忏悔维度;他们利用他们的伊比利亚背景和知识来整理和解释他们所观察到的;他们以局外人的身份来解构宗教界限,想象不同的宗教景观,最终将自己重新插入到他们新创造的宗教地图和秩序中。这一论点是基于对《以色列的和解》(1651年)最后一卷《玛拿西》的一章的仔细阅读,以及丹尼尔·利瓦伊·德·巴里奥斯(Daniel Levi de Barrios)的诗歌《自由的阿尔韦德里奥与和谐的爱情》(1680年)。
Confessional Divides, Cross-Confessional Connections, and Jewish Responses: Menasseh ben Israel and Daniel Levi de Barrios on De auxiliis and Dordt
Abstract Studies in the Jewish reception of Christian theological discussions beyond the proper field of polemics are rare and only in their beginnings. Until now, scholars have often argued that Portuguese Jews discussed Christian concepts of divine foreknowledge and human free will because they were either struggling with their own Christian past or sought to help their ‘New Jewish’ coreligionists to turn into reliable members of the Amsterdam Sephardic community. This article uses the example of the Catholic Controversia de auxiliis, and the Protestant fight over Predestination before and after the Synod of Dordt (1618-1619) to argue that Portuguese Jews such as Menasseh ben Israel and Daniel Levi de Barrios recognised the cross-confessional dimension of the Christian debates on divine grace; they used their Iberian background and knowledge to order and explain what they observed; and they displayed their position as outsiders to deconstruct religious boundaries, imagine alternative religious landscapes, and finally re-insert themselves into their newly created religious maps and orders. The argument is based on a close reading of one chapter of the last volume of Menasseh ben Israel’s Conciliador (1651) as well as Daniel Levi de Barrios’s poem Libre Alvedrio y Harmonia del Cuerpo, por disposicion del alma (1680).