Q4 Arts and Humanities
M. Wesoły
{"title":"Bycie – nie bycie, prawda – fałsz w koncepcji Arystotelesa","authors":"M. Wesoły","doi":"10.14746/10.14746/pea.2021.1.9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The basis of Aristotle’s arguments about truth and falsity is formulated syntactically according to the distinctions of ‘to be’ as the predicative affirmation - composition and, correspondingly, ‘not to be’ as negation – separation. As the nominal defining characteristic of falsity is contradic­tion, so of truth is non-contradiction. The expression of truth or falsity in the declarative sentence of affirmation or negation is a function of thinking as a human cognitive disposition under the semantic figures of categorical predication. In addition, we cite Aristotle’s more important texts on the true intellection of non-composites (indivisibles), the inves­tigation of truth and probability, the diagnosis of falsehood, the truthful­ness and lying. Finally, a mention of modern adaptations of Aristotle’s concept of truth.","PeriodicalId":36201,"journal":{"name":"Peitho","volume":"37 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Peitho","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14746/10.14746/pea.2021.1.9","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

亚里士多德关于真伪论证的基础,是根据“有”作为谓语的肯定(构成)和相应的“非”作为否定(分离)的区别,在句法上表述出来的。正如虚妄的名义定义特征是矛盾性一样,真理的名义定义特征是非矛盾性。肯定或否定陈述句的真假表达是在直言谓词的语义形象下,思维作为人类认知倾向的一种功能。此外,我们引用亚里士多德更重要的关于非组合物(不可分割物)的真正思考,真理和概率的调查,虚假的诊断,真实和谎言的文本。最后,提到现代对亚里士多德真理概念的改编。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Bycie – nie bycie, prawda – fałsz w koncepcji Arystotelesa
The basis of Aristotle’s arguments about truth and falsity is formulated syntactically according to the distinctions of ‘to be’ as the predicative affirmation - composition and, correspondingly, ‘not to be’ as negation – separation. As the nominal defining characteristic of falsity is contradic­tion, so of truth is non-contradiction. The expression of truth or falsity in the declarative sentence of affirmation or negation is a function of thinking as a human cognitive disposition under the semantic figures of categorical predication. In addition, we cite Aristotle’s more important texts on the true intellection of non-composites (indivisibles), the inves­tigation of truth and probability, the diagnosis of falsehood, the truthful­ness and lying. Finally, a mention of modern adaptations of Aristotle’s concept of truth.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Peitho
Peitho Arts and Humanities-Philosophy
CiteScore
0.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
10 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信