Siamak Naji Hadadi, H. Ayatollahi, Masoumeh Noushyar
{"title":"葡萄糖转运蛋白-1标记物表达强度及其在鉴别交界性和恶性卵巢上皮肿瘤中的诊断价值","authors":"Siamak Naji Hadadi, H. Ayatollahi, Masoumeh Noushyar","doi":"10.34172/ddj.2023.441","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Ovarian cancer ranks second among gynecological cancers worldwide. This study aimed to compare the glucose transporter-1 (GLUT-1) expression in benign, borderline, and malignant ovarian epithelial tumors and evaluate GLUT-1 expression as a diagnostic tool for distinguishing tumors in the ovary. Materials and Methods: This descriptive-analytical cross-sectional study analyzed 69 pathological samples of patients diagnosed with ovarian epithelial tumors who underwent oophorectomy. Immunohistochemical staining was performed using GLUT-1 antibody. The intensity of cell membrane staining and the proportion of positive neoplastic cells were graded to score immunostaining. Chi-square/Fisher’s exact test was used to analyze the data. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV), and staining accuracy for GLUT-1 in distinguishing borderline from invasive tumors were calculated by standard methods (P<0.05). Results: In all benign tumors, GLUT-1 staining was negative. In addition, weak staining intensity was observed in 38.5% of borderline tumors, and 96% of invasive tumors had strong staining intensity (P<0.001). Strong GLUT-1 staining was found in 94.7% of Papillary Serous Carcinoma, 9/1% of Borderline Serous tumors, 100% of Brenner tumors, and clear cell carcinoma. The results demonstrated a high diagnostic value of GLUT-1 expression intensity in differentiating between borderline and malignant ovarian epithelial tumors (Accuracy: 97.10, Sensitivity: 96%, Specificity: 97.73). Conclusion: Overall, GLUT-1 expression could help distinguish benign from borderline, especially borderline from malignant ovarian epithelial tumors. Thus, it seems that it provides useful prognostic information, particularly for the borderline category.","PeriodicalId":11143,"journal":{"name":"Disease and Diagnosis","volume":"26 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluation of the Expression Intensity of Glucose Transporter-1 Marker and its Diagnostic Value in Differentiating Between Borderline and Malignant Ovarian Epithelial Tumors\",\"authors\":\"Siamak Naji Hadadi, H. Ayatollahi, Masoumeh Noushyar\",\"doi\":\"10.34172/ddj.2023.441\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background: Ovarian cancer ranks second among gynecological cancers worldwide. This study aimed to compare the glucose transporter-1 (GLUT-1) expression in benign, borderline, and malignant ovarian epithelial tumors and evaluate GLUT-1 expression as a diagnostic tool for distinguishing tumors in the ovary. Materials and Methods: This descriptive-analytical cross-sectional study analyzed 69 pathological samples of patients diagnosed with ovarian epithelial tumors who underwent oophorectomy. Immunohistochemical staining was performed using GLUT-1 antibody. The intensity of cell membrane staining and the proportion of positive neoplastic cells were graded to score immunostaining. Chi-square/Fisher’s exact test was used to analyze the data. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV), and staining accuracy for GLUT-1 in distinguishing borderline from invasive tumors were calculated by standard methods (P<0.05). Results: In all benign tumors, GLUT-1 staining was negative. In addition, weak staining intensity was observed in 38.5% of borderline tumors, and 96% of invasive tumors had strong staining intensity (P<0.001). Strong GLUT-1 staining was found in 94.7% of Papillary Serous Carcinoma, 9/1% of Borderline Serous tumors, 100% of Brenner tumors, and clear cell carcinoma. The results demonstrated a high diagnostic value of GLUT-1 expression intensity in differentiating between borderline and malignant ovarian epithelial tumors (Accuracy: 97.10, Sensitivity: 96%, Specificity: 97.73). Conclusion: Overall, GLUT-1 expression could help distinguish benign from borderline, especially borderline from malignant ovarian epithelial tumors. Thus, it seems that it provides useful prognostic information, particularly for the borderline category.\",\"PeriodicalId\":11143,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Disease and Diagnosis\",\"volume\":\"26 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Disease and Diagnosis\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.34172/ddj.2023.441\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Disease and Diagnosis","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.34172/ddj.2023.441","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Evaluation of the Expression Intensity of Glucose Transporter-1 Marker and its Diagnostic Value in Differentiating Between Borderline and Malignant Ovarian Epithelial Tumors
Background: Ovarian cancer ranks second among gynecological cancers worldwide. This study aimed to compare the glucose transporter-1 (GLUT-1) expression in benign, borderline, and malignant ovarian epithelial tumors and evaluate GLUT-1 expression as a diagnostic tool for distinguishing tumors in the ovary. Materials and Methods: This descriptive-analytical cross-sectional study analyzed 69 pathological samples of patients diagnosed with ovarian epithelial tumors who underwent oophorectomy. Immunohistochemical staining was performed using GLUT-1 antibody. The intensity of cell membrane staining and the proportion of positive neoplastic cells were graded to score immunostaining. Chi-square/Fisher’s exact test was used to analyze the data. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV), and staining accuracy for GLUT-1 in distinguishing borderline from invasive tumors were calculated by standard methods (P<0.05). Results: In all benign tumors, GLUT-1 staining was negative. In addition, weak staining intensity was observed in 38.5% of borderline tumors, and 96% of invasive tumors had strong staining intensity (P<0.001). Strong GLUT-1 staining was found in 94.7% of Papillary Serous Carcinoma, 9/1% of Borderline Serous tumors, 100% of Brenner tumors, and clear cell carcinoma. The results demonstrated a high diagnostic value of GLUT-1 expression intensity in differentiating between borderline and malignant ovarian epithelial tumors (Accuracy: 97.10, Sensitivity: 96%, Specificity: 97.73). Conclusion: Overall, GLUT-1 expression could help distinguish benign from borderline, especially borderline from malignant ovarian epithelial tumors. Thus, it seems that it provides useful prognostic information, particularly for the borderline category.