中世纪著作中的合法与非法占卜

Q3 Arts and Humanities
Mihai Dragena
{"title":"中世纪著作中的合法与非法占卜","authors":"Mihai Dragena","doi":"10.53745/ccp.46.89.3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article analyzes the characteristics of divination since early Christianity, canonical regulations on the practice, and the arguments for which it was condemned by the theologians. It will also analyze the semantic ambivalence of medieval vocabulary in relation to divinatory practices. Since only God’s prophetic power was allowed, all types of prognostication of the future without His approval were considered false and illegitimate. What this article will show is that from the early Middle Ages onwards, divination was distinguished by other prognostic methods through the nature of the divine messages and human reasoning.","PeriodicalId":38702,"journal":{"name":"Croatica Christiana Periodica","volume":"33 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Legitimate and Illegitimate Divination in Medieval Writings\",\"authors\":\"Mihai Dragena\",\"doi\":\"10.53745/ccp.46.89.3\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This article analyzes the characteristics of divination since early Christianity, canonical regulations on the practice, and the arguments for which it was condemned by the theologians. It will also analyze the semantic ambivalence of medieval vocabulary in relation to divinatory practices. Since only God’s prophetic power was allowed, all types of prognostication of the future without His approval were considered false and illegitimate. What this article will show is that from the early Middle Ages onwards, divination was distinguished by other prognostic methods through the nature of the divine messages and human reasoning.\",\"PeriodicalId\":38702,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Croatica Christiana Periodica\",\"volume\":\"33 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Croatica Christiana Periodica\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.53745/ccp.46.89.3\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Arts and Humanities\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Croatica Christiana Periodica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.53745/ccp.46.89.3","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

本文分析了早期基督教以来占卜的特点,对占卜的规范规定,以及神学家谴责占卜的理由。它还将分析与占卜实践有关的中世纪词汇的语义矛盾。因为只有上帝的预言能力是被允许的,所有未经上帝批准的对未来的预言都被认为是虚假和非法的。本文将展示的是,从中世纪早期开始,通过神圣信息和人类推理的性质,占卜与其他预言方法区别开来。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Legitimate and Illegitimate Divination in Medieval Writings
This article analyzes the characteristics of divination since early Christianity, canonical regulations on the practice, and the arguments for which it was condemned by the theologians. It will also analyze the semantic ambivalence of medieval vocabulary in relation to divinatory practices. Since only God’s prophetic power was allowed, all types of prognostication of the future without His approval were considered false and illegitimate. What this article will show is that from the early Middle Ages onwards, divination was distinguished by other prognostic methods through the nature of the divine messages and human reasoning.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Croatica Christiana Periodica
Croatica Christiana Periodica Arts and Humanities-Religious Studies
CiteScore
0.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
26
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信