等级中的共和国:波托马克河军队中的忠诚与异议

IF 0.2 Q2 HISTORY
Henry N. Buehner
{"title":"等级中的共和国:波托马克河军队中的忠诚与异议","authors":"Henry N. Buehner","doi":"10.5325/pennhistory.90.1.0128","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In The Life of Billy Yank (1952), Bell Irvin Wiley concluded that patriotism, coupled with a devotion to the Union, sustained Northern soldiers. Politically aware and ideologically driven, Union troops vehemently disagreed about the execution of the war. Political discord within the armies has garnered much scholarly interest in recent years, though it is often through the perspective of the high command. In A Republic in the Ranks: Loyalty and Dissent in the Army of the Potomac, Zachery A. Fry shifts the locus of inquiry and seeks to understand “the deep divisions over the war’s conduct among junior officers and enlisted men” (p. 1). He cogently argues that the Civil War created a political awakening for common soldiers. Educated and prompted by junior officers, the army’s political neophytes became schooled in Democratic or Republican ideology. In the end, the Republican camp won out as witnessed especially in loyalty to the Lincoln administration and participation in the public sphere of opinion. Carefully argued and trenchantly researched, A Republic in the Ranks is a highly readable and historiographically significant work on the Union army’s political life as viewed from the ground. Composed of six chapters with an extended introduction, Fry’s book is framed chronologically around a series of political crises in the Army of the Potomac. While giving essential context through concise discussions of the war’s military dimensions, Fry dwells on the months between campaigns to explore the army’s shifting political culture. In the war’s first year, many soldiers believed George B. McClellan and Fitz John Porter “represented the army’s greatest bulwark against radicalism and civilian interference” (p. 67). By mid1863, though, junior officers, primed for emancipation, skillfully turned soldiers against Democrats who they portrayed as antiwar partisans threatening to undo the army’s hard-fought gains. It was also during this period that news sources changed—one of the book’s","PeriodicalId":42553,"journal":{"name":"Pennsylvania History-A Journal of Mid-Atlantic Studies","volume":"33 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Republic in the Ranks: Loyalty and Dissent in the Army of the Potomac\",\"authors\":\"Henry N. Buehner\",\"doi\":\"10.5325/pennhistory.90.1.0128\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In The Life of Billy Yank (1952), Bell Irvin Wiley concluded that patriotism, coupled with a devotion to the Union, sustained Northern soldiers. Politically aware and ideologically driven, Union troops vehemently disagreed about the execution of the war. Political discord within the armies has garnered much scholarly interest in recent years, though it is often through the perspective of the high command. In A Republic in the Ranks: Loyalty and Dissent in the Army of the Potomac, Zachery A. Fry shifts the locus of inquiry and seeks to understand “the deep divisions over the war’s conduct among junior officers and enlisted men” (p. 1). He cogently argues that the Civil War created a political awakening for common soldiers. Educated and prompted by junior officers, the army’s political neophytes became schooled in Democratic or Republican ideology. In the end, the Republican camp won out as witnessed especially in loyalty to the Lincoln administration and participation in the public sphere of opinion. Carefully argued and trenchantly researched, A Republic in the Ranks is a highly readable and historiographically significant work on the Union army’s political life as viewed from the ground. Composed of six chapters with an extended introduction, Fry’s book is framed chronologically around a series of political crises in the Army of the Potomac. While giving essential context through concise discussions of the war’s military dimensions, Fry dwells on the months between campaigns to explore the army’s shifting political culture. In the war’s first year, many soldiers believed George B. McClellan and Fitz John Porter “represented the army’s greatest bulwark against radicalism and civilian interference” (p. 67). By mid1863, though, junior officers, primed for emancipation, skillfully turned soldiers against Democrats who they portrayed as antiwar partisans threatening to undo the army’s hard-fought gains. It was also during this period that news sources changed—one of the book’s\",\"PeriodicalId\":42553,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Pennsylvania History-A Journal of Mid-Atlantic Studies\",\"volume\":\"33 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Pennsylvania History-A Journal of Mid-Atlantic Studies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5325/pennhistory.90.1.0128\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"HISTORY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pennsylvania History-A Journal of Mid-Atlantic Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5325/pennhistory.90.1.0128","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HISTORY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在《比利·扬克的一生》(1952)中,贝尔·欧文·威利总结道,爱国主义加上对联邦的忠诚,支撑着北方士兵。在政治意识和意识形态的驱使下,联邦军队强烈反对这场战争的执行。近年来,军队内部的政治不和引起了很多学者的兴趣,尽管这通常是从最高指挥部的角度来看的。在《队伍中的共和国:波托马克河军队中的忠诚与异议》一书中,扎克里·A·弗莱(Zachery A. Fry)转移了调查的焦点,试图理解“下级军官和士兵对战争行为的深刻分歧”(第1页)。他令人信服地认为,内战给普通士兵带来了政治觉醒。在下级军官的教育和推动下,军队的政治新人开始接受民主党或共和党意识形态的教育。最后,共和党阵营赢得了胜利,尤其是在对林肯政府的忠诚和对公共舆论领域的参与方面。本书论述缜密,研究深入,是一部极具可读性和历史意义的著作,从地面上观察联邦军队的政治生活。弗莱的书由六章和一个扩展的引言组成,书中围绕波托马克军的一系列政治危机按时间顺序展开。通过对战争军事层面的简明讨论,弗莱给出了必要的背景,同时他还详述了两次战役之间的几个月,以探索军队不断变化的政治文化。在战争的第一年,许多士兵认为乔治·b·麦克莱伦和菲茨·约翰·波特“代表了军队对抗激进主义和民间干涉的最伟大堡垒”(第67页)。然而,到了1863年中期,为解放黑奴做好准备的初级军官们巧妙地让士兵们反对民主党人,他们把民主党人描绘成反战的游击队员,威胁着军队来之不易的成果。也正是在这一时期,新闻来源发生了变化——这本书的来源之一
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A Republic in the Ranks: Loyalty and Dissent in the Army of the Potomac
In The Life of Billy Yank (1952), Bell Irvin Wiley concluded that patriotism, coupled with a devotion to the Union, sustained Northern soldiers. Politically aware and ideologically driven, Union troops vehemently disagreed about the execution of the war. Political discord within the armies has garnered much scholarly interest in recent years, though it is often through the perspective of the high command. In A Republic in the Ranks: Loyalty and Dissent in the Army of the Potomac, Zachery A. Fry shifts the locus of inquiry and seeks to understand “the deep divisions over the war’s conduct among junior officers and enlisted men” (p. 1). He cogently argues that the Civil War created a political awakening for common soldiers. Educated and prompted by junior officers, the army’s political neophytes became schooled in Democratic or Republican ideology. In the end, the Republican camp won out as witnessed especially in loyalty to the Lincoln administration and participation in the public sphere of opinion. Carefully argued and trenchantly researched, A Republic in the Ranks is a highly readable and historiographically significant work on the Union army’s political life as viewed from the ground. Composed of six chapters with an extended introduction, Fry’s book is framed chronologically around a series of political crises in the Army of the Potomac. While giving essential context through concise discussions of the war’s military dimensions, Fry dwells on the months between campaigns to explore the army’s shifting political culture. In the war’s first year, many soldiers believed George B. McClellan and Fitz John Porter “represented the army’s greatest bulwark against radicalism and civilian interference” (p. 67). By mid1863, though, junior officers, primed for emancipation, skillfully turned soldiers against Democrats who they portrayed as antiwar partisans threatening to undo the army’s hard-fought gains. It was also during this period that news sources changed—one of the book’s
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.10
自引率
50.00%
发文量
32
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信