WTO争端解决程序

T. Jahan
{"title":"WTO争端解决程序","authors":"T. Jahan","doi":"10.2307/j.ctvqr1f5g.6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The World trade organization’s (WTO) Dispute settlement Understanding (DSU) is the legally-binding agreement promising WTO members to settle their international trades related disputes. An important presumption in the WTO is that States are expected to comply with their obligations in line with Article 26 of the Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties(VCLT). However, the WTO dispute settlement process is a debatable instrument of compromise as there is option for political flexibility in resolving disputes, on the other side of the coin, under Article 3.2 of the DSU it must provide legal integrity, security and predictability of WTO law. Nevertheless, WTO provisions are not clear and need to clarification. This article will examine the burden of proof considering the DSU and WTO jurisprudence, specifically Panels decisions and Appellate division decisions.","PeriodicalId":13360,"journal":{"name":"Imperial journal of interdisciplinary research","volume":"11 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"WTO Dispute Settlement Process\",\"authors\":\"T. Jahan\",\"doi\":\"10.2307/j.ctvqr1f5g.6\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The World trade organization’s (WTO) Dispute settlement Understanding (DSU) is the legally-binding agreement promising WTO members to settle their international trades related disputes. An important presumption in the WTO is that States are expected to comply with their obligations in line with Article 26 of the Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties(VCLT). However, the WTO dispute settlement process is a debatable instrument of compromise as there is option for political flexibility in resolving disputes, on the other side of the coin, under Article 3.2 of the DSU it must provide legal integrity, security and predictability of WTO law. Nevertheless, WTO provisions are not clear and need to clarification. This article will examine the burden of proof considering the DSU and WTO jurisprudence, specifically Panels decisions and Appellate division decisions.\",\"PeriodicalId\":13360,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Imperial journal of interdisciplinary research\",\"volume\":\"11 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Imperial journal of interdisciplinary research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctvqr1f5g.6\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Imperial journal of interdisciplinary research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctvqr1f5g.6","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

世界贸易组织(WTO)的《争端解决谅解》(DSU)是一项具有法律约束力的协议,承诺世贸组织成员解决与国际贸易有关的争端。世贸组织的一个重要假设是,各国应遵守《维也纳条约法公约》(VCLT)第26条规定的义务。然而,世贸组织争端解决程序是一种有争议的妥协工具,因为在解决争端方面有政治灵活性的选择,另一方面,根据DSU第3.2条,它必须提供世贸组织法律的法律完整性、安全性和可预测性。然而,世贸组织的规定并不明确,需要澄清。本文将考虑到DSU和WTO的判例,特别是专家组的决定和上诉部门的决定,来研究举证责任。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
WTO Dispute Settlement Process
The World trade organization’s (WTO) Dispute settlement Understanding (DSU) is the legally-binding agreement promising WTO members to settle their international trades related disputes. An important presumption in the WTO is that States are expected to comply with their obligations in line with Article 26 of the Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties(VCLT). However, the WTO dispute settlement process is a debatable instrument of compromise as there is option for political flexibility in resolving disputes, on the other side of the coin, under Article 3.2 of the DSU it must provide legal integrity, security and predictability of WTO law. Nevertheless, WTO provisions are not clear and need to clarification. This article will examine the burden of proof considering the DSU and WTO jurisprudence, specifically Panels decisions and Appellate division decisions.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信