真实模拟在肺体检教学中的有效性:随机临床试验

IF 0.4 Q4 NURSING
Ana Carolina Costa Carino, R. Fernandes, Maria Isabel da Conceição Dias Fernandes, J. D. D. S. Tinôco, Camila Sayonara Tavares Gomes, Anna Thays Dias Almeida, A. C. X. D. Lira
{"title":"真实模拟在肺体检教学中的有效性:随机临床试验","authors":"Ana Carolina Costa Carino, R. Fernandes, Maria Isabel da Conceição Dias Fernandes, J. D. D. S. Tinôco, Camila Sayonara Tavares Gomes, Anna Thays Dias Almeida, A. C. X. D. Lira","doi":"10.15253/2175-6783.20222380801","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: to evaluate effectiveness of realistic clinical simulation for teaching pulmonary physical examination to undergraduate nursing students. Methods: experimental study of pre-test and post-test type applied to randomized intervention and control groups. The sample consisted of 30 students, randomly divided. The analysis was performed using descriptive and inferential statistics, through Kolmogorov-Smirnov test and t-test for independent samples, considering statistical significance p≤0.05. A satisfaction scale validated with the intervention group was applied. Results: we identified increased correct answers in post-test in the intervention group, which was submitted to realistic simulation. In this group, the mean number of errors varied from 4.87 in the pre-test to 2.13 in the post-test. In the control group, students either decreased or maintained the number of correct answers in the post-test, and mean errors increased, from 3.87 in the pre-test to 4.0 in post-test. The difference in correct answers between intervention and control groups was significant (p=0.000). Conclusion: from realistic simulation, students obtained a lower average error rate on post-test. Contributions to practice: results of this research favor the curricular insertion of simulation for teaching pulmonary physical examination in undergraduate nursing.","PeriodicalId":45440,"journal":{"name":"Rev Rene","volume":"29 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effectiveness of realistic simulation for teaching pulmonary physical examination: randomized clinical trial\",\"authors\":\"Ana Carolina Costa Carino, R. Fernandes, Maria Isabel da Conceição Dias Fernandes, J. D. D. S. Tinôco, Camila Sayonara Tavares Gomes, Anna Thays Dias Almeida, A. C. X. D. Lira\",\"doi\":\"10.15253/2175-6783.20222380801\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Objective: to evaluate effectiveness of realistic clinical simulation for teaching pulmonary physical examination to undergraduate nursing students. Methods: experimental study of pre-test and post-test type applied to randomized intervention and control groups. The sample consisted of 30 students, randomly divided. The analysis was performed using descriptive and inferential statistics, through Kolmogorov-Smirnov test and t-test for independent samples, considering statistical significance p≤0.05. A satisfaction scale validated with the intervention group was applied. Results: we identified increased correct answers in post-test in the intervention group, which was submitted to realistic simulation. In this group, the mean number of errors varied from 4.87 in the pre-test to 2.13 in the post-test. In the control group, students either decreased or maintained the number of correct answers in the post-test, and mean errors increased, from 3.87 in the pre-test to 4.0 in post-test. The difference in correct answers between intervention and control groups was significant (p=0.000). Conclusion: from realistic simulation, students obtained a lower average error rate on post-test. Contributions to practice: results of this research favor the curricular insertion of simulation for teaching pulmonary physical examination in undergraduate nursing.\",\"PeriodicalId\":45440,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Rev Rene\",\"volume\":\"29 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-11-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Rev Rene\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.15253/2175-6783.20222380801\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"NURSING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Rev Rene","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15253/2175-6783.20222380801","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:评价真实感临床模拟在护理本科学生肺部体检教学中的效果。方法:采用随机干预组和对照组进行前测型和后测型实验研究。样本由30名随机分组的学生组成。采用描述性统计和推断性统计进行分析,通过独立样本的Kolmogorov-Smirnov检验和t检验,考虑p≤0.05的统计学意义。采用经干预组验证的满意度量表。结果:我们发现干预组的后测正确答案增加,并将其提交到现实模拟中。在这一组中,平均错误数从前测的4.87到后测的2.13不等。在对照组中,学生在后测中正确答案的数量或减少或保持不变,平均误差从前测的3.87增加到后测的4.0。干预组与对照组的正确答案差异有统计学意义(p=0.000)。结论:通过真实模拟,学生的后测平均错误率较低。对实践的贡献:本研究结果有利于在护理本科肺部体检教学中加入模拟课程。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Effectiveness of realistic simulation for teaching pulmonary physical examination: randomized clinical trial
Objective: to evaluate effectiveness of realistic clinical simulation for teaching pulmonary physical examination to undergraduate nursing students. Methods: experimental study of pre-test and post-test type applied to randomized intervention and control groups. The sample consisted of 30 students, randomly divided. The analysis was performed using descriptive and inferential statistics, through Kolmogorov-Smirnov test and t-test for independent samples, considering statistical significance p≤0.05. A satisfaction scale validated with the intervention group was applied. Results: we identified increased correct answers in post-test in the intervention group, which was submitted to realistic simulation. In this group, the mean number of errors varied from 4.87 in the pre-test to 2.13 in the post-test. In the control group, students either decreased or maintained the number of correct answers in the post-test, and mean errors increased, from 3.87 in the pre-test to 4.0 in post-test. The difference in correct answers between intervention and control groups was significant (p=0.000). Conclusion: from realistic simulation, students obtained a lower average error rate on post-test. Contributions to practice: results of this research favor the curricular insertion of simulation for teaching pulmonary physical examination in undergraduate nursing.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Rev Rene
Rev Rene NURSING-
自引率
20.00%
发文量
63
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信