体制机制在空间数据基础设施发展中支持决策的作用

IF 2.1 Q3 REMOTE SENSING
M. Feeney, I. Williamson, I. Bishop
{"title":"体制机制在空间数据基础设施发展中支持决策的作用","authors":"M. Feeney, I. Williamson, I. Bishop","doi":"10.1080/00690805.2002.9714203","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Improved economic, social and environmental decision-making are principal objectives for investing in the development of Spatial Data Infrastructure (SDI) at all political and administrative levels. Indeed, Resolution 7 of the recent 5th Global Spatial Data Infrastructure (GSDI) conference in Cartagena, Colombia (GSDI, 2001) argued that the purpose of the GSDI is to improve the availability, accessibility, and applicability of spatial information for decisionmaking. While accepting the development of institutional mechanisms to support decisionmaking by promoting the availability and accessibility of spatial information as part of SDI institutional frameworks, many institutional mechanisms fall short of addressing the application of spatial data to decison-making. From an institutional perspective, the motivation for SDI implementation is the impracticality of a single organisation producing and maintaining the wide variety of data and models needed to inform many decisions, resulting in a need for sharing of data and a range of analytical and display tools. This is being seen particularly in the natural resource, environment and government sectors in Australia. These sectors are utilising institutional mechanisms to support spatial decision-making processes in a number of different ways including the development of community resource centres, departmental development of decision support tools, as well as the development of atlases, spatial data directories and on-line land information services. In Australia these institutional mechanisms are playing a crucial role in providing the building blocks for the institutional framework of SDIs and address different levels of the decision-making process. This paper looks at how availability and accessibility of spatial data are being achieved by reviewing examples from each of the institutional mechanisms mentioned. The variety of decision-making levels supported by these different initiatives is reviewed in terms of decision process theory. The paper concludes with a discussion of the implications of the approaches to developing institutional support for decision-making as part of SDI development, as well as a consideration of directions for SDI development in the future to support spatial decision-making processes.","PeriodicalId":44129,"journal":{"name":"Geodesy and Cartography","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2002-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Role of Institutional Mechanisms in Spatial Data Infrastructure Development that Supports Decision-making\",\"authors\":\"M. Feeney, I. Williamson, I. Bishop\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/00690805.2002.9714203\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Improved economic, social and environmental decision-making are principal objectives for investing in the development of Spatial Data Infrastructure (SDI) at all political and administrative levels. Indeed, Resolution 7 of the recent 5th Global Spatial Data Infrastructure (GSDI) conference in Cartagena, Colombia (GSDI, 2001) argued that the purpose of the GSDI is to improve the availability, accessibility, and applicability of spatial information for decisionmaking. While accepting the development of institutional mechanisms to support decisionmaking by promoting the availability and accessibility of spatial information as part of SDI institutional frameworks, many institutional mechanisms fall short of addressing the application of spatial data to decison-making. From an institutional perspective, the motivation for SDI implementation is the impracticality of a single organisation producing and maintaining the wide variety of data and models needed to inform many decisions, resulting in a need for sharing of data and a range of analytical and display tools. This is being seen particularly in the natural resource, environment and government sectors in Australia. These sectors are utilising institutional mechanisms to support spatial decision-making processes in a number of different ways including the development of community resource centres, departmental development of decision support tools, as well as the development of atlases, spatial data directories and on-line land information services. In Australia these institutional mechanisms are playing a crucial role in providing the building blocks for the institutional framework of SDIs and address different levels of the decision-making process. This paper looks at how availability and accessibility of spatial data are being achieved by reviewing examples from each of the institutional mechanisms mentioned. The variety of decision-making levels supported by these different initiatives is reviewed in terms of decision process theory. The paper concludes with a discussion of the implications of the approaches to developing institutional support for decision-making as part of SDI development, as well as a consideration of directions for SDI development in the future to support spatial decision-making processes.\",\"PeriodicalId\":44129,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Geodesy and Cartography\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2002-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"6\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Geodesy and Cartography\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/00690805.2002.9714203\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"REMOTE SENSING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Geodesy and Cartography","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00690805.2002.9714203","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"REMOTE SENSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

摘要

改善经济、社会和环境决策是在所有政治和行政层面投资发展空间数据基础设施(SDI)的主要目标。事实上,最近在哥伦比亚卡塔赫纳举行的第五届全球空间数据基础设施(GSDI, 2001)会议的第7号决议认为,GSDI的目的是提高空间信息在决策中的可用性、可及性和适用性。虽然作为SDI体制框架的一部分,通过促进空间信息的可用性和可及性来支持决策的体制机制得到了发展,但许多体制机制未能解决空间数据在决策中的应用问题。从制度的角度来看,实施SDI的动机是单一组织产生和维护各种各样的数据和模型是不切实际的,这些数据和模型需要为许多决策提供信息,因此需要共享数据和一系列分析和显示工具。这在澳大利亚的自然资源、环境和政府部门尤其明显。这些部门正在利用体制机制以若干不同方式支持空间决策过程,包括发展社区资源中心、部门发展决策支助工具、以及编制地图集、空间数据目录和联机土地信息服务。在澳大利亚,这些体制机制在为可持续发展指标的体制框架提供基石和处理决策过程的不同层次方面发挥着关键作用。本文通过回顾上述各体制机制的实例,探讨如何实现空间数据的可用性和可及性。从决策过程理论的角度回顾了这些不同举措所支持的各种决策水平。最后,本文讨论了作为SDI发展的一部分,为决策提供制度支持的方法的含义,并考虑了未来SDI发展的方向,以支持空间决策过程。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Role of Institutional Mechanisms in Spatial Data Infrastructure Development that Supports Decision-making
Improved economic, social and environmental decision-making are principal objectives for investing in the development of Spatial Data Infrastructure (SDI) at all political and administrative levels. Indeed, Resolution 7 of the recent 5th Global Spatial Data Infrastructure (GSDI) conference in Cartagena, Colombia (GSDI, 2001) argued that the purpose of the GSDI is to improve the availability, accessibility, and applicability of spatial information for decisionmaking. While accepting the development of institutional mechanisms to support decisionmaking by promoting the availability and accessibility of spatial information as part of SDI institutional frameworks, many institutional mechanisms fall short of addressing the application of spatial data to decison-making. From an institutional perspective, the motivation for SDI implementation is the impracticality of a single organisation producing and maintaining the wide variety of data and models needed to inform many decisions, resulting in a need for sharing of data and a range of analytical and display tools. This is being seen particularly in the natural resource, environment and government sectors in Australia. These sectors are utilising institutional mechanisms to support spatial decision-making processes in a number of different ways including the development of community resource centres, departmental development of decision support tools, as well as the development of atlases, spatial data directories and on-line land information services. In Australia these institutional mechanisms are playing a crucial role in providing the building blocks for the institutional framework of SDIs and address different levels of the decision-making process. This paper looks at how availability and accessibility of spatial data are being achieved by reviewing examples from each of the institutional mechanisms mentioned. The variety of decision-making levels supported by these different initiatives is reviewed in terms of decision process theory. The paper concludes with a discussion of the implications of the approaches to developing institutional support for decision-making as part of SDI development, as well as a consideration of directions for SDI development in the future to support spatial decision-making processes.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Geodesy and Cartography
Geodesy and Cartography REMOTE SENSING-
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
15 weeks
期刊介绍: THE JOURNAL IS DESIGNED FOR PUBLISHING PAPERS CONCERNING THE FOLLOWING FIELDS OF RESEARCH: •study, establishment and improvement of the geodesy and mapping technologies, •establishing and improving the geodetic networks, •theoretical and practical principles of developing standards for geodetic measurements, •mathematical treatment of the geodetic and photogrammetric measurements, •controlling and application of the permanent GPS stations, •study and measurements of Earth’s figure and parameters of the gravity field, •study and development the geoid models,
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信