{"title":"医生为在法庭上披露某一案件而进行核磁共振造影","authors":"Hangsi Priyanto","doi":"10.20884/1.jih.2019.5.1.107","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The making of Visum et Repertum gives full duty to doctors as implementers in the field to assist prosecutors in determining the direction of the charges that will be charged against the defendant, as well as assisting the judge in finding material truth in deciding criminal cases. This research is aimed at knowing and analyzing the technique of making Visum et Repertum by doctors as an effort to uncover cases in the judicial process. In addition, it is also intended to find out the authority to make Visum et Repertum by forensic experts and analyze the role of Visum et Repertum for judges in disclosing cases in the judicial process. The study uses a normative juridical approach, with secondary data sources. The results showed that the technique of making Visum et Repertum by doctors as an effort to uncover cases in the judicial process was divided into techniques which were examination of wounded victims, techniques for examining sexual crime victims, child victim examination techniques, extermination examination techniques and autopsies and psychiatric examination techniques. Visum et Repertum (VeR) was made at the request of the National Police investigator through an official letter signed at least by the Sector Police Chief. Visum et Repertum does not have to be made by a forensic specialist. The subjects making visum et repertum in the judicial process are also distinguished on the division of abilities, namely by the specialization stipulated in the legislation and the subject of general visum et repertum makers. The role of Visum et Repertum for judges in disclosing cases in the judicial process is the completeness of evidence in pro-judicial cases with examinations in court proceedings, assisting in efforts to increase the judge's confidence in decision making.","PeriodicalId":31701,"journal":{"name":"Jurnal Idea Hukum","volume":"5 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-03-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"PEMBUATAN VISUM ET REPERTUM OLEH DOKTER SEBAGAI UPAYA MENGUNGKAP PERKARA DI DALAM PROSES PERADILAN\",\"authors\":\"Hangsi Priyanto\",\"doi\":\"10.20884/1.jih.2019.5.1.107\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The making of Visum et Repertum gives full duty to doctors as implementers in the field to assist prosecutors in determining the direction of the charges that will be charged against the defendant, as well as assisting the judge in finding material truth in deciding criminal cases. This research is aimed at knowing and analyzing the technique of making Visum et Repertum by doctors as an effort to uncover cases in the judicial process. In addition, it is also intended to find out the authority to make Visum et Repertum by forensic experts and analyze the role of Visum et Repertum for judges in disclosing cases in the judicial process. The study uses a normative juridical approach, with secondary data sources. The results showed that the technique of making Visum et Repertum by doctors as an effort to uncover cases in the judicial process was divided into techniques which were examination of wounded victims, techniques for examining sexual crime victims, child victim examination techniques, extermination examination techniques and autopsies and psychiatric examination techniques. Visum et Repertum (VeR) was made at the request of the National Police investigator through an official letter signed at least by the Sector Police Chief. Visum et Repertum does not have to be made by a forensic specialist. The subjects making visum et repertum in the judicial process are also distinguished on the division of abilities, namely by the specialization stipulated in the legislation and the subject of general visum et repertum makers. The role of Visum et Repertum for judges in disclosing cases in the judicial process is the completeness of evidence in pro-judicial cases with examinations in court proceedings, assisting in efforts to increase the judge's confidence in decision making.\",\"PeriodicalId\":31701,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Jurnal Idea Hukum\",\"volume\":\"5 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-03-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Jurnal Idea Hukum\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.20884/1.jih.2019.5.1.107\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jurnal Idea Hukum","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.20884/1.jih.2019.5.1.107","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2
摘要
《意见与程序》的制定赋予了医生作为该领域执行者的全部责任,即协助检察官确定将对被告提出指控的方向,并协助法官在判决刑事案件时查明重要真相。本研究旨在了解和分析医生在司法过程中为揭露案件而做出的“Visum et Repertum”的技术。此外,还试图找出法医专家制定“证据与陈述”的权限,分析“证据与陈述”对法官在司法过程中披露案件的作用。该研究采用了规范性的司法方法,并使用了二手数据来源。结果表明,在司法过程中,医生作为破案手段所使用的“证言与复述”技术分为对受伤受害者的检查技术、对性犯罪受害者的检查技术、对儿童受害者的检查技术、对绝杀受害者的检查技术以及尸检和精神病学检查技术。在国家警察调查员的要求下,至少由区警察局长签署了一封正式信件,发出了“休假与通知”。《遗言与剧目》并不一定要由法医专家来制作。在司法程序中,作出回复令的主体也在能力的划分上有所区别,即立法规定的专门化和一般回复令的主体。法官在司法程序中披露案件时,《证据与汇编》的作用是在有利于司法的案件中确保证据的完整性,并在法庭程序中进行审查,有助于提高法官对决策的信心。
PEMBUATAN VISUM ET REPERTUM OLEH DOKTER SEBAGAI UPAYA MENGUNGKAP PERKARA DI DALAM PROSES PERADILAN
The making of Visum et Repertum gives full duty to doctors as implementers in the field to assist prosecutors in determining the direction of the charges that will be charged against the defendant, as well as assisting the judge in finding material truth in deciding criminal cases. This research is aimed at knowing and analyzing the technique of making Visum et Repertum by doctors as an effort to uncover cases in the judicial process. In addition, it is also intended to find out the authority to make Visum et Repertum by forensic experts and analyze the role of Visum et Repertum for judges in disclosing cases in the judicial process. The study uses a normative juridical approach, with secondary data sources. The results showed that the technique of making Visum et Repertum by doctors as an effort to uncover cases in the judicial process was divided into techniques which were examination of wounded victims, techniques for examining sexual crime victims, child victim examination techniques, extermination examination techniques and autopsies and psychiatric examination techniques. Visum et Repertum (VeR) was made at the request of the National Police investigator through an official letter signed at least by the Sector Police Chief. Visum et Repertum does not have to be made by a forensic specialist. The subjects making visum et repertum in the judicial process are also distinguished on the division of abilities, namely by the specialization stipulated in the legislation and the subject of general visum et repertum makers. The role of Visum et Repertum for judges in disclosing cases in the judicial process is the completeness of evidence in pro-judicial cases with examinations in court proceedings, assisting in efforts to increase the judge's confidence in decision making.