间期细胞核荧光点计数

H. Netten, L. Vliet, H. Vrolijk, W. Sloos, H. Tanke, I. Young
{"title":"间期细胞核荧光点计数","authors":"H. Netten, L. Vliet, H. Vrolijk, W. Sloos, H. Tanke, I. Young","doi":"10.1002/1361-6374(199606)4:2<93::AID-BIO7>3.0.CO;2-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Fluorescence in situ hybridization allows the enumeration of chromosomal abnormalities in interphase cell nuclei. This process is called dot counting. To estimate the distribution of chromosomes per cell, a large number of cells have to be analysed, particularly when the frequency of aberrant cells is low. Automation of dot counting is desirable because manual counting is tedious, fatiguing, and time consuming. We have developed a completely automated fluorescence microscope system that counts fluorescent hybridization dots for one probe in interphase cell nuclei. This system works with two fluorescent dyes—one for the DNA hybridization dots and one for the cell nucleus. A fully automated scanning procedure has been used for the image acquisition. After an image is acquired it has to be analysed in order to find the nuclei and to detect the dots. This article focuses upon the dot detection procedure. Three different algorithms are presented. The problems of 'overlapping' dots and split dots are discussed. The automated dot counter has been tested on a number of normal specimens where DAPI was used for the nucleus counter stain and a centromeric probe was used to mark the chromosome 12. The slides contained lymphocytes from cultured blood. The performance of the different algorithms has been evaluated and compared with manually obtained results. The automated counting results approximate the results of manual counting.","PeriodicalId":100176,"journal":{"name":"Bioimaging","volume":"44 1","pages":"93-106"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1996-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"54","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Fluorescent dot counting in interphase cell nuclei\",\"authors\":\"H. Netten, L. Vliet, H. Vrolijk, W. Sloos, H. Tanke, I. Young\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/1361-6374(199606)4:2<93::AID-BIO7>3.0.CO;2-7\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Fluorescence in situ hybridization allows the enumeration of chromosomal abnormalities in interphase cell nuclei. This process is called dot counting. To estimate the distribution of chromosomes per cell, a large number of cells have to be analysed, particularly when the frequency of aberrant cells is low. Automation of dot counting is desirable because manual counting is tedious, fatiguing, and time consuming. We have developed a completely automated fluorescence microscope system that counts fluorescent hybridization dots for one probe in interphase cell nuclei. This system works with two fluorescent dyes—one for the DNA hybridization dots and one for the cell nucleus. A fully automated scanning procedure has been used for the image acquisition. After an image is acquired it has to be analysed in order to find the nuclei and to detect the dots. This article focuses upon the dot detection procedure. Three different algorithms are presented. The problems of 'overlapping' dots and split dots are discussed. The automated dot counter has been tested on a number of normal specimens where DAPI was used for the nucleus counter stain and a centromeric probe was used to mark the chromosome 12. The slides contained lymphocytes from cultured blood. The performance of the different algorithms has been evaluated and compared with manually obtained results. The automated counting results approximate the results of manual counting.\",\"PeriodicalId\":100176,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Bioimaging\",\"volume\":\"44 1\",\"pages\":\"93-106\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1996-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"54\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Bioimaging\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/1361-6374(199606)4:2<93::AID-BIO7>3.0.CO;2-7\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bioimaging","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/1361-6374(199606)4:2<93::AID-BIO7>3.0.CO;2-7","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 54

摘要

荧光原位杂交可以枚举间期细胞核的染色体异常。这个过程称为点计数。为了估计每个细胞的染色体分布,必须分析大量的细胞,特别是当异常细胞的频率较低时。网点计数的自动化是可取的,因为手动计数是乏味的,疲劳的,和耗时的。我们开发了一种完全自动化的荧光显微镜系统,可以在间期细胞核中对一个探针的荧光杂交点进行计数。该系统使用两种荧光染料,一种用于DNA杂交点,另一种用于细胞核。一个全自动扫描程序已用于图像采集。在获得图像后,必须对其进行分析,以找到核并检测点。本文重点介绍了网点检测过程。提出了三种不同的算法。讨论了“重叠”点和分裂点的问题。自动点计数器已在许多正常标本上进行了测试,其中DAPI用于细胞核计数染色,并使用着丝粒探针标记12号染色体。载玻片含有来自培养血液的淋巴细胞。对不同算法的性能进行了评价,并与人工获得的结果进行了比较。自动计数的结果与人工计数的结果接近。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Fluorescent dot counting in interphase cell nuclei
Fluorescence in situ hybridization allows the enumeration of chromosomal abnormalities in interphase cell nuclei. This process is called dot counting. To estimate the distribution of chromosomes per cell, a large number of cells have to be analysed, particularly when the frequency of aberrant cells is low. Automation of dot counting is desirable because manual counting is tedious, fatiguing, and time consuming. We have developed a completely automated fluorescence microscope system that counts fluorescent hybridization dots for one probe in interphase cell nuclei. This system works with two fluorescent dyes—one for the DNA hybridization dots and one for the cell nucleus. A fully automated scanning procedure has been used for the image acquisition. After an image is acquired it has to be analysed in order to find the nuclei and to detect the dots. This article focuses upon the dot detection procedure. Three different algorithms are presented. The problems of 'overlapping' dots and split dots are discussed. The automated dot counter has been tested on a number of normal specimens where DAPI was used for the nucleus counter stain and a centromeric probe was used to mark the chromosome 12. The slides contained lymphocytes from cultured blood. The performance of the different algorithms has been evaluated and compared with manually obtained results. The automated counting results approximate the results of manual counting.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信