Young Rock Jang MD , Yoon Ju Oh MD , Jin Yong Kim MD, MPH
{"title":"雷达维单抗治疗轻中度COVID-19的临床疗效:一项回顾性队列研究","authors":"Young Rock Jang MD , Yoon Ju Oh MD , Jin Yong Kim MD, MPH","doi":"10.1016/j.curtheres.2022.100675","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>In a Phase III study, regdanvimab (CT-P59) reduced the risk of hospitalization or death versus placebo in patients with mild-to-moderate coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19).</p></div><div><h3>Purpose</h3><p>We performed a retrospective cohort study of patients with COVID-19 to examine the effect of regdanvimab versus standard of care (SoC) on oxygen saturation.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>We reviewed patients with mild-to-moderate COVID-19 confirmed by reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction at a single hospital in the Republic of Korea. The primary efficacy end point was the proportion of patients deteriorating with peripheral capillary oxygen saturation <94% on room air up to day 28.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>A total of 127 patients were treated for COVID-19 with regdanvimab, 190 with SoC. The proportion of patients deteriorating with peripheral capillary oxygen saturation <94% on room air up to day 28 was 13.4% with regdanvimab and 39.5% with SoC (<em>P <</em> 0.0001); median time (range) until sustained recovery of fever was 2.0 (0.2–14.8) and 4.2 (0.1–17.1) days, respectively. Supplemental oxygen was required by 23.6% of patients with regdanvimab and 52.1% with SoC (<em>P<</em>0.0001) for a mean of 6.3 and 8.7 days, respectively (<em>P =</em> 0.0113); no patients needed mechanical ventilation. Compared with SoC, hospitalization was shorter with regdanvimab (mean = 11.1 vs 13.6 days; 63.8% vs 31.6% discharged within 11 days; both <em>P</em> values <em><</em> 0.0001). Fewer regdanvimab-treated patients required remdesivir (14.2% vs 43.2%; <em>P <</em> 0.0001). There were no deaths. Two patients had adverse reactions with regdanvimab.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>This real-world study indicates that regdanvimab can prevent deterioration in patients with mild-to-moderate COVID-19. (<em>Curr Ther Res Clin Exp</em>. 2022; 83:XXX–XXX)</p></div>","PeriodicalId":10920,"journal":{"name":"Current Therapeutic Research-clinical and Experimental","volume":"96 ","pages":"Article 100675"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0011393X22000145/pdfft?md5=75c3afe6ceeb8f033d6431a6ec475871&pid=1-s2.0-S0011393X22000145-main.pdf","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Clinical Effectiveness of Regdanvimab Treatment for Mild-to-Moderate COVID-19: A Retrospective Cohort Study\",\"authors\":\"Young Rock Jang MD , Yoon Ju Oh MD , Jin Yong Kim MD, MPH\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.curtheres.2022.100675\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>In a Phase III study, regdanvimab (CT-P59) reduced the risk of hospitalization or death versus placebo in patients with mild-to-moderate coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19).</p></div><div><h3>Purpose</h3><p>We performed a retrospective cohort study of patients with COVID-19 to examine the effect of regdanvimab versus standard of care (SoC) on oxygen saturation.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>We reviewed patients with mild-to-moderate COVID-19 confirmed by reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction at a single hospital in the Republic of Korea. The primary efficacy end point was the proportion of patients deteriorating with peripheral capillary oxygen saturation <94% on room air up to day 28.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>A total of 127 patients were treated for COVID-19 with regdanvimab, 190 with SoC. The proportion of patients deteriorating with peripheral capillary oxygen saturation <94% on room air up to day 28 was 13.4% with regdanvimab and 39.5% with SoC (<em>P <</em> 0.0001); median time (range) until sustained recovery of fever was 2.0 (0.2–14.8) and 4.2 (0.1–17.1) days, respectively. Supplemental oxygen was required by 23.6% of patients with regdanvimab and 52.1% with SoC (<em>P<</em>0.0001) for a mean of 6.3 and 8.7 days, respectively (<em>P =</em> 0.0113); no patients needed mechanical ventilation. Compared with SoC, hospitalization was shorter with regdanvimab (mean = 11.1 vs 13.6 days; 63.8% vs 31.6% discharged within 11 days; both <em>P</em> values <em><</em> 0.0001). Fewer regdanvimab-treated patients required remdesivir (14.2% vs 43.2%; <em>P <</em> 0.0001). There were no deaths. Two patients had adverse reactions with regdanvimab.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>This real-world study indicates that regdanvimab can prevent deterioration in patients with mild-to-moderate COVID-19. (<em>Curr Ther Res Clin Exp</em>. 2022; 83:XXX–XXX)</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10920,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Current Therapeutic Research-clinical and Experimental\",\"volume\":\"96 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100675\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0011393X22000145/pdfft?md5=75c3afe6ceeb8f033d6431a6ec475871&pid=1-s2.0-S0011393X22000145-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Current Therapeutic Research-clinical and Experimental\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0011393X22000145\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Therapeutic Research-clinical and Experimental","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0011393X22000145","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4
摘要
在一项III期研究中,regdanvimab (CT-P59)与安慰剂相比,降低了轻中度冠状病毒病2019 (COVID-19)患者住院或死亡的风险。目的:对COVID-19患者进行回顾性队列研究,探讨瑞丹维单抗与标准护理(SoC)对血氧饱和度的影响。方法回顾性分析韩国一家医院经逆转录聚合酶链反应确诊的轻中度COVID-19患者。主要疗效终点为28天前使用室内空气时外周血管血氧饱和度(94%)恶化的患者比例。结果regdanvimab治疗的新冠肺炎患者127例,SoC治疗的患者190例。使用室内空气治疗至第28天外周毛细血管血氧饱和度恶化的患者比例为94%,而使用雷格丹昔单抗组为13.4%,使用SoC组为39.5% (P <0.0001);至持续发热恢复的中位时间(范围)分别为2.0(0.2-14.8)天和4.2(0.1-17.1)天。23.6%的regdanvimab患者和52.1%的SoC患者(P<0.0001)需要补充氧气,平均分别为6.3天和8.7天(P = 0.0113);没有患者需要机械通气。与SoC相比,regdanvimab的住院时间更短(平均 = 11.1 vs 13.6天;63.8% vs . 31.6% 11天内出院;两个P值<0.0001)。接受雷达维单抗治疗的患者较少需要瑞德西韦(14.2% vs 43.2%;P & lt;0.0001)。没有人员死亡。2例患者出现雷达维单抗不良反应。结论这项现实世界的研究表明,雷丹昔单抗可以预防轻至中度COVID-19患者病情恶化。(中国临床医学杂志,2022;83: XXX-XXX)
Clinical Effectiveness of Regdanvimab Treatment for Mild-to-Moderate COVID-19: A Retrospective Cohort Study
Background
In a Phase III study, regdanvimab (CT-P59) reduced the risk of hospitalization or death versus placebo in patients with mild-to-moderate coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19).
Purpose
We performed a retrospective cohort study of patients with COVID-19 to examine the effect of regdanvimab versus standard of care (SoC) on oxygen saturation.
Methods
We reviewed patients with mild-to-moderate COVID-19 confirmed by reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction at a single hospital in the Republic of Korea. The primary efficacy end point was the proportion of patients deteriorating with peripheral capillary oxygen saturation <94% on room air up to day 28.
Results
A total of 127 patients were treated for COVID-19 with regdanvimab, 190 with SoC. The proportion of patients deteriorating with peripheral capillary oxygen saturation <94% on room air up to day 28 was 13.4% with regdanvimab and 39.5% with SoC (P < 0.0001); median time (range) until sustained recovery of fever was 2.0 (0.2–14.8) and 4.2 (0.1–17.1) days, respectively. Supplemental oxygen was required by 23.6% of patients with regdanvimab and 52.1% with SoC (P<0.0001) for a mean of 6.3 and 8.7 days, respectively (P = 0.0113); no patients needed mechanical ventilation. Compared with SoC, hospitalization was shorter with regdanvimab (mean = 11.1 vs 13.6 days; 63.8% vs 31.6% discharged within 11 days; both P values < 0.0001). Fewer regdanvimab-treated patients required remdesivir (14.2% vs 43.2%; P < 0.0001). There were no deaths. Two patients had adverse reactions with regdanvimab.
Conclusions
This real-world study indicates that regdanvimab can prevent deterioration in patients with mild-to-moderate COVID-19. (Curr Ther Res Clin Exp. 2022; 83:XXX–XXX)
期刊介绍:
We also encourage the submission of manuscripts presenting preclinical and very preliminary research that may stimulate further investigation of potentially relevant findings, as well as in-depth review articles on specific therapies or disease states, and applied health delivery or pharmacoeconomics.
CTR encourages and supports the submission of manuscripts describing:
• Interventions designed to understand or improve human health, disease treatment or disease prevention;
• Studies that focus on problems that are uncommon in resource-rich countries;
• Research that is "under-published" because of limited access to monetary resources such as English language support and Open Access fees (CTR offers deeply discounted English language editing);
• Republication of articles previously published in non-English journals (eg, evidence-based guidelines) which could be useful if translated into English;
• Preclinical and clinical product development studies that are not pursued for further investigation based upon early phase results.