论不可执行合同条款的意外使用:来自住宅租赁市场的证据

IF 3 1区 社会学 Q1 LAW
Meirav Furth-Matzkin
{"title":"论不可执行合同条款的意外使用:来自住宅租赁市场的证据","authors":"Meirav Furth-Matzkin","doi":"10.1093/JLA/LAX002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Thisarticleexplorestheprevalenceofunenforceableandmisleadingtermsinresidential rental contracts. For this purpose, the study analyzes a sample of seventy residential leasesfromtheGreaterBostonAreaintermsofMassachusettsLandlordandTenantLaw. The article’s findings reveal that landlords often use deceptive—as well as clearly in-valid—provisions in their contracts, and regularly fail to disclose the vast majority of the mandatory rights and remedies that the law bestows upon tenants in their leases. Building on psychological insights and on survey evidence, the article suggests that this drafting pattern may significantly affect tenants’ decisions and behavior. In particu-lar,whenaproblemoradisputewiththelandlordarises,tenantsarelikelytoperceivethe terms in their lease agreements as enforceable and binding, and consequently forgo validlegalrightsandclaims.Therefore,thearticleexpectsthatsuchclauseswillpersistas long as monitoring and enforcement mechanisms do not sufficiently deter landlords from using such terms in their contracts. In light of this evidence, the article discusses preliminary policy prescriptions.","PeriodicalId":45189,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Legal Analysis","volume":"23 1","pages":"1-49"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"14","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"On the Unexpected Use of Unenforceable Contract Terms: Evidence from the Residential Rental Market\",\"authors\":\"Meirav Furth-Matzkin\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/JLA/LAX002\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Thisarticleexplorestheprevalenceofunenforceableandmisleadingtermsinresidential rental contracts. For this purpose, the study analyzes a sample of seventy residential leasesfromtheGreaterBostonAreaintermsofMassachusettsLandlordandTenantLaw. The article’s findings reveal that landlords often use deceptive—as well as clearly in-valid—provisions in their contracts, and regularly fail to disclose the vast majority of the mandatory rights and remedies that the law bestows upon tenants in their leases. Building on psychological insights and on survey evidence, the article suggests that this drafting pattern may significantly affect tenants’ decisions and behavior. In particu-lar,whenaproblemoradisputewiththelandlordarises,tenantsarelikelytoperceivethe terms in their lease agreements as enforceable and binding, and consequently forgo validlegalrightsandclaims.Therefore,thearticleexpectsthatsuchclauseswillpersistas long as monitoring and enforcement mechanisms do not sufficiently deter landlords from using such terms in their contracts. In light of this evidence, the article discusses preliminary policy prescriptions.\",\"PeriodicalId\":45189,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Legal Analysis\",\"volume\":\"23 1\",\"pages\":\"1-49\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"14\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Legal Analysis\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/JLA/LAX002\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"LAW\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Legal Analysis","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/JLA/LAX002","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 14

摘要

本文探讨了住宅租赁合同中不可执行和误导性条款的普遍性。为此,该研究分析了大波士顿地区70份住宅租赁合同的样本,其中包括马萨诸塞州的房东和租户法。这篇文章的发现揭示了房东经常在他们的合同中使用欺骗性的条款——以及明显无效的条款,并且经常没有披露法律在租约中赋予租户的绝大多数强制性权利和补救措施。基于心理学见解和调查证据,本文认为这种起草模式可能会显著影响租户的决策和行为。特别是,当与房东发生问题或纠纷时,租户很可能认为租赁协议中的条款具有可执行性和约束力,从而放弃有效的法律权利和索赔。因此,文章预计,只要监督和执行机制不足以阻止房东在合同中使用这些条款,这些条款就会持续存在。根据这一证据,本文探讨了初步的政策处方。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
On the Unexpected Use of Unenforceable Contract Terms: Evidence from the Residential Rental Market
Thisarticleexplorestheprevalenceofunenforceableandmisleadingtermsinresidential rental contracts. For this purpose, the study analyzes a sample of seventy residential leasesfromtheGreaterBostonAreaintermsofMassachusettsLandlordandTenantLaw. The article’s findings reveal that landlords often use deceptive—as well as clearly in-valid—provisions in their contracts, and regularly fail to disclose the vast majority of the mandatory rights and remedies that the law bestows upon tenants in their leases. Building on psychological insights and on survey evidence, the article suggests that this drafting pattern may significantly affect tenants’ decisions and behavior. In particu-lar,whenaproblemoradisputewiththelandlordarises,tenantsarelikelytoperceivethe terms in their lease agreements as enforceable and binding, and consequently forgo validlegalrightsandclaims.Therefore,thearticleexpectsthatsuchclauseswillpersistas long as monitoring and enforcement mechanisms do not sufficiently deter landlords from using such terms in their contracts. In light of this evidence, the article discusses preliminary policy prescriptions.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
3
审稿时长
16 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信