可视化语言的复杂性和熟练程度在学习者的英语写作

IF 2.3 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
CALICO Journal Pub Date : 2023-05-25 DOI:10.1558/cj.19487
Thomas Gaillat, Antoine Lafontaine, Anas Knefati
{"title":"可视化语言的复杂性和熟练程度在学习者的英语写作","authors":"Thomas Gaillat, Antoine Lafontaine, Anas Knefati","doi":"10.1558/cj.19487","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this article, we focus on the design of a second language (L2) formative feedback system that provides linguistic complexity graph reports on the writings of English for special purposes students at the university level. The system is evaluated in light of formative instruction features pointed out in the literature. The significance of complexity metrics is also evaluated. A learner corpus of English classified according to the Common European Framework of References for Languages (CEFR) was processed using a pipeline that computes 83 complexity metrics. By way of analysis of variance (ANOVA) testing, multinomial logistic regression, and clustering methods, we identified and validated a set of nine significant metrics in terms of proficiency levels. Validation with classification gave 67.51% (A level), 60.16% (B level), and 60.47% (C level) balanced accuracy. Clustering showed between 53.10% and 67.37% homogeneity, depending on the level. As a result, these metrics were used to create graphical reports about the linguistic complexity of learner writing. These reports are designed to help language teachers diagnose their students’ writings in comparison with prerecorded cohorts of different proficiencies.","PeriodicalId":46819,"journal":{"name":"CALICO Journal","volume":"39 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Visualizing Linguistic Complexity and Proficiency in Learner English Writings\",\"authors\":\"Thomas Gaillat, Antoine Lafontaine, Anas Knefati\",\"doi\":\"10.1558/cj.19487\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In this article, we focus on the design of a second language (L2) formative feedback system that provides linguistic complexity graph reports on the writings of English for special purposes students at the university level. The system is evaluated in light of formative instruction features pointed out in the literature. The significance of complexity metrics is also evaluated. A learner corpus of English classified according to the Common European Framework of References for Languages (CEFR) was processed using a pipeline that computes 83 complexity metrics. By way of analysis of variance (ANOVA) testing, multinomial logistic regression, and clustering methods, we identified and validated a set of nine significant metrics in terms of proficiency levels. Validation with classification gave 67.51% (A level), 60.16% (B level), and 60.47% (C level) balanced accuracy. Clustering showed between 53.10% and 67.37% homogeneity, depending on the level. As a result, these metrics were used to create graphical reports about the linguistic complexity of learner writing. These reports are designed to help language teachers diagnose their students’ writings in comparison with prerecorded cohorts of different proficiencies.\",\"PeriodicalId\":46819,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"CALICO Journal\",\"volume\":\"39 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-05-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"CALICO Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1558/cj.19487\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"CALICO Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1558/cj.19487","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

在这篇文章中,我们着重于第二语言(L2)形成反馈系统的设计,该系统为大学水平的特殊目的学生提供英语写作的语言复杂性图表报告。根据文献中指出的形成性教学特征对该体系进行了评价。本文还对复杂性度量的重要性进行了评价。根据欧洲通用语言参考框架(CEFR)分类的英语学习者语料库使用一个计算83个复杂性指标的管道进行处理。通过方差分析(ANOVA)检验、多项逻辑回归和聚类方法,我们确定并验证了一组关于熟练程度的9个显著指标。分类验证的平衡准确率分别为67.51% (A级)、60.16% (B级)和60.47% (C级)。不同水平的聚类均性在53.10% ~ 67.37%之间。因此,这些指标被用来创建关于学习者写作的语言复杂性的图形报告。这些报告旨在帮助语言教师通过与预先录制的不同熟练程度的学生进行比较,来诊断学生的写作水平。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Visualizing Linguistic Complexity and Proficiency in Learner English Writings
In this article, we focus on the design of a second language (L2) formative feedback system that provides linguistic complexity graph reports on the writings of English for special purposes students at the university level. The system is evaluated in light of formative instruction features pointed out in the literature. The significance of complexity metrics is also evaluated. A learner corpus of English classified according to the Common European Framework of References for Languages (CEFR) was processed using a pipeline that computes 83 complexity metrics. By way of analysis of variance (ANOVA) testing, multinomial logistic regression, and clustering methods, we identified and validated a set of nine significant metrics in terms of proficiency levels. Validation with classification gave 67.51% (A level), 60.16% (B level), and 60.47% (C level) balanced accuracy. Clustering showed between 53.10% and 67.37% homogeneity, depending on the level. As a result, these metrics were used to create graphical reports about the linguistic complexity of learner writing. These reports are designed to help language teachers diagnose their students’ writings in comparison with prerecorded cohorts of different proficiencies.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CALICO Journal
CALICO Journal EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
10.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信