不同冷却结构对双缸摩托车发动机冷却性能及油耗的数值模拟与实验研究

IF 1.1 Q3 TRANSPORTATION SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY
Libin Tan, Yuejin Yuan, Can Huang
{"title":"不同冷却结构对双缸摩托车发动机冷却性能及油耗的数值模拟与实验研究","authors":"Libin Tan, Yuejin Yuan, Can Huang","doi":"10.4271/03-16-08-0063","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The reasonable engine cooling system design can give a better cooling of engine,\n the coolant flow direction and different cooling structure designs have great\n impact on the cooling performance and fuel consumption of engine. Therefore, to\n gain a deeper understanding of the impact of different cooling system designs on\n engine cooling performance, three different split cooling structures and two\n oil–water heat exchanger (OWHE) layouts are designed for a two-cylinder\n motorcycle engine. Three-dimensional CFD analysis method is used for analyzing\n the coolant velocity distributions and one-dimensional systematic analysis\n method is used for analyzing the system flow rate at those cooling structure\n designs and OWHE designs. Meanwhile, experimental investigation of different\n cooling structures and OWHE layouts on fuel consumption is conducted by the\n bench test of worldwide motorcycle test cycle. Results indicated that the\n difference of coolant flow velocity distribution for four cooling structures are\n small and the flow resistance of Case D is lowest at fully opened thermostat\n condition. The fuel consumption of Case D is 4.78 L/100 km, 1.4% lower than that\n of Case A with the fuel consumption 4.85 L/100 km. The combined split cooling\n structure Case D and OWHE layout one is proven as the optimal cooling design\n with 4% fuel consumption reduction compared with that of original cooling\n structure Case A. The research results can provide theoretical reference for\n engine cooling performance evaluation and give valuable data to motorcycle\n designers for quick evaluation of design and quick solutions of improved\n design.","PeriodicalId":47948,"journal":{"name":"SAE International Journal of Engines","volume":"145 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Numerical Simulation and Experimental Investigation of Different\\n Cooling Structures on Cooling Performance and Fuel Consumption of a Two-Cylinder\\n Motorcycle Engine\",\"authors\":\"Libin Tan, Yuejin Yuan, Can Huang\",\"doi\":\"10.4271/03-16-08-0063\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The reasonable engine cooling system design can give a better cooling of engine,\\n the coolant flow direction and different cooling structure designs have great\\n impact on the cooling performance and fuel consumption of engine. Therefore, to\\n gain a deeper understanding of the impact of different cooling system designs on\\n engine cooling performance, three different split cooling structures and two\\n oil–water heat exchanger (OWHE) layouts are designed for a two-cylinder\\n motorcycle engine. Three-dimensional CFD analysis method is used for analyzing\\n the coolant velocity distributions and one-dimensional systematic analysis\\n method is used for analyzing the system flow rate at those cooling structure\\n designs and OWHE designs. Meanwhile, experimental investigation of different\\n cooling structures and OWHE layouts on fuel consumption is conducted by the\\n bench test of worldwide motorcycle test cycle. Results indicated that the\\n difference of coolant flow velocity distribution for four cooling structures are\\n small and the flow resistance of Case D is lowest at fully opened thermostat\\n condition. The fuel consumption of Case D is 4.78 L/100 km, 1.4% lower than that\\n of Case A with the fuel consumption 4.85 L/100 km. The combined split cooling\\n structure Case D and OWHE layout one is proven as the optimal cooling design\\n with 4% fuel consumption reduction compared with that of original cooling\\n structure Case A. The research results can provide theoretical reference for\\n engine cooling performance evaluation and give valuable data to motorcycle\\n designers for quick evaluation of design and quick solutions of improved\\n design.\",\"PeriodicalId\":47948,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"SAE International Journal of Engines\",\"volume\":\"145 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-06-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"SAE International Journal of Engines\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4271/03-16-08-0063\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"TRANSPORTATION SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"SAE International Journal of Engines","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4271/03-16-08-0063","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"TRANSPORTATION SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

合理的发动机冷却系统设计可以使发动机得到更好的冷却,冷却剂的流动方向和不同的冷却结构设计对发动机的冷却性能和油耗有很大的影响。因此,为了更深入地了解不同冷却系统设计对发动机冷却性能的影响,针对某双缸摩托车发动机设计了三种不同的分体式冷却结构和两种油水热交换器(OWHE)布局。采用三维CFD分析方法分析冷却剂速度分布,采用一维系统分析方法分析冷却结构设计和OWHE设计下的系统流量。同时,通过世界摩托车试验循环台架试验,对不同冷却结构和OWHE布局对油耗的影响进行了试验研究。结果表明,四种冷却结构的冷却剂流速分布差异较小,在全开恒温条件下,Case D的流动阻力最小。工况D的油耗为4.78 L/百公里,比工况A的4.85 L/百公里油耗低1.4%。验证了分体式冷却结构方案D与OWHE布置方案1的组合是较原冷却结构方案a的最优冷却设计方案,比原冷却结构方案a的油耗降低4%。研究结果可为发动机冷却性能评价提供理论参考,为摩托车设计人员快速评价设计和改进设计的快速解决方案提供有价值的数据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Numerical Simulation and Experimental Investigation of Different Cooling Structures on Cooling Performance and Fuel Consumption of a Two-Cylinder Motorcycle Engine
The reasonable engine cooling system design can give a better cooling of engine, the coolant flow direction and different cooling structure designs have great impact on the cooling performance and fuel consumption of engine. Therefore, to gain a deeper understanding of the impact of different cooling system designs on engine cooling performance, three different split cooling structures and two oil–water heat exchanger (OWHE) layouts are designed for a two-cylinder motorcycle engine. Three-dimensional CFD analysis method is used for analyzing the coolant velocity distributions and one-dimensional systematic analysis method is used for analyzing the system flow rate at those cooling structure designs and OWHE designs. Meanwhile, experimental investigation of different cooling structures and OWHE layouts on fuel consumption is conducted by the bench test of worldwide motorcycle test cycle. Results indicated that the difference of coolant flow velocity distribution for four cooling structures are small and the flow resistance of Case D is lowest at fully opened thermostat condition. The fuel consumption of Case D is 4.78 L/100 km, 1.4% lower than that of Case A with the fuel consumption 4.85 L/100 km. The combined split cooling structure Case D and OWHE layout one is proven as the optimal cooling design with 4% fuel consumption reduction compared with that of original cooling structure Case A. The research results can provide theoretical reference for engine cooling performance evaluation and give valuable data to motorcycle designers for quick evaluation of design and quick solutions of improved design.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
SAE International Journal of Engines
SAE International Journal of Engines TRANSPORTATION SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY-
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
8.30%
发文量
38
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信