LigaSure与传统方法在全甲状腺切除术中的比较:一位外科医生的经验和文献综述,LigaSure在全甲状腺切除术中并不优于缝线结扎

Gökhan Demiral, F. Aksoy
{"title":"LigaSure与传统方法在全甲状腺切除术中的比较:一位外科医生的经验和文献综述,LigaSure在全甲状腺切除术中并不优于缝线结扎","authors":"Gökhan Demiral, F. Aksoy","doi":"10.5455/umj.20191022104415","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: The objective of this study was to compare the results of the LigaSure® Precise vessel sealing system and conventional suture ligation (CSL) for total thyroidectomy in terms of complication rates, hospitalization, and surgical time. Materials and Methods: This non-randomized retrospective review included 118 consecutive patients. All patients with nodular or multinodular goiter underwent total thyroidectomy by a single surgeon. The patients were divided into two subgroups: CSL was used as the conventional method together with monopolar and bipolar cautery (group 1), and LigaSure® Precise (L) was used in group 2 as a sealing system for all surrounding tissues of the thyroid gland. Results: No statistically significant differences were found between the two techniques with respect to age, sex, surgical time, hospitalization, and postoperative complications (p>0.05). Conclusion: Sutureless thyroid operations with Ligasure can be safely performed without the presence of higher complication risks but does not reduce surgical time or hospitalization.","PeriodicalId":23051,"journal":{"name":"THE ULUTAS MEDICAL JOURNAL","volume":"180 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of LigaSure and the Conventional Method in Total Thyroidectomy: A Single Surgeon's Experience and Review of the Literature that LigaSure is not superior to Suture Ligation in Total Thyroidectomy\",\"authors\":\"Gökhan Demiral, F. Aksoy\",\"doi\":\"10.5455/umj.20191022104415\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background: The objective of this study was to compare the results of the LigaSure® Precise vessel sealing system and conventional suture ligation (CSL) for total thyroidectomy in terms of complication rates, hospitalization, and surgical time. Materials and Methods: This non-randomized retrospective review included 118 consecutive patients. All patients with nodular or multinodular goiter underwent total thyroidectomy by a single surgeon. The patients were divided into two subgroups: CSL was used as the conventional method together with monopolar and bipolar cautery (group 1), and LigaSure® Precise (L) was used in group 2 as a sealing system for all surrounding tissues of the thyroid gland. Results: No statistically significant differences were found between the two techniques with respect to age, sex, surgical time, hospitalization, and postoperative complications (p>0.05). Conclusion: Sutureless thyroid operations with Ligasure can be safely performed without the presence of higher complication risks but does not reduce surgical time or hospitalization.\",\"PeriodicalId\":23051,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"THE ULUTAS MEDICAL JOURNAL\",\"volume\":\"180 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"THE ULUTAS MEDICAL JOURNAL\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5455/umj.20191022104415\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"THE ULUTAS MEDICAL JOURNAL","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5455/umj.20191022104415","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

摘要

背景:本研究的目的是比较LigaSure®精确血管密封系统和传统缝合结扎(CSL)在全甲状腺切除术中的并发症发生率、住院率和手术时间。材料和方法:本非随机回顾性研究纳入118例连续患者。所有结节性或多结节性甲状腺肿患者均由同一位外科医生行甲状腺全切除术。患者被分为两个亚组:CSL作为常规方法联合单极和双极烧灼(1组),LigaSure®Precise (L)作为甲状腺周围所有组织的封闭系统(2组)。结果:两种术式在年龄、性别、手术时间、住院时间、术后并发症等方面差异均无统计学意义(p>0.05)。结论:使用Ligasure进行无缝线甲状腺手术是安全的,没有较高的并发症,但没有减少手术时间和住院时间。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparison of LigaSure and the Conventional Method in Total Thyroidectomy: A Single Surgeon's Experience and Review of the Literature that LigaSure is not superior to Suture Ligation in Total Thyroidectomy
Background: The objective of this study was to compare the results of the LigaSure® Precise vessel sealing system and conventional suture ligation (CSL) for total thyroidectomy in terms of complication rates, hospitalization, and surgical time. Materials and Methods: This non-randomized retrospective review included 118 consecutive patients. All patients with nodular or multinodular goiter underwent total thyroidectomy by a single surgeon. The patients were divided into two subgroups: CSL was used as the conventional method together with monopolar and bipolar cautery (group 1), and LigaSure® Precise (L) was used in group 2 as a sealing system for all surrounding tissues of the thyroid gland. Results: No statistically significant differences were found between the two techniques with respect to age, sex, surgical time, hospitalization, and postoperative complications (p>0.05). Conclusion: Sutureless thyroid operations with Ligasure can be safely performed without the presence of higher complication risks but does not reduce surgical time or hospitalization.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信