从专家集体评估的角度看数字金融金字塔

IF 0.5 Q4 ECONOMICS
M. Ryzhkova, E. Kashapova
{"title":"从专家集体评估的角度看数字金融金字塔","authors":"M. Ryzhkova, E. Kashapova","doi":"10.17835/2076-6297.2023.15.2.024-044","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The process of digital transformation of fraudulent schemes includes the financial pyramids. The existence of financial pyramids dates back hundreds of year. The phenomenon is steadily reproducing, however, digitalization has given unprecedented opportunities for the organizers to avoid responsibility and additional properties of the schemes themselves, causing an explosive increase in the number of pyramids in recent years. The objective of the study is to understand, whether there is a phenomenon of “digital financial pyramid”, and if so, to identify the it’s criteria. We use a two-step research procedure. The first step is crowdsourcing as a collection of information about a sample of pyramids from the list of the Bank of Russia by volunteers. The second step is a brainstorming among participants who are interested in financial pyramids. The results of the study are rated lists of * methods of attracting participants by the organizers (by channels and content), * characteristics of a person who is a potential participant in financial pyramids, * attractive features of high-yield risky schemes, * reasons why participants in high-yield risky schemes lose their investments. Academic and practical experts in the financial field have verified the results.","PeriodicalId":43842,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Institutional Studies","volume":"61 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Digital Financial Pyramids Through the Lens of Collective Expert Assessment\",\"authors\":\"M. Ryzhkova, E. Kashapova\",\"doi\":\"10.17835/2076-6297.2023.15.2.024-044\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The process of digital transformation of fraudulent schemes includes the financial pyramids. The existence of financial pyramids dates back hundreds of year. The phenomenon is steadily reproducing, however, digitalization has given unprecedented opportunities for the organizers to avoid responsibility and additional properties of the schemes themselves, causing an explosive increase in the number of pyramids in recent years. The objective of the study is to understand, whether there is a phenomenon of “digital financial pyramid”, and if so, to identify the it’s criteria. We use a two-step research procedure. The first step is crowdsourcing as a collection of information about a sample of pyramids from the list of the Bank of Russia by volunteers. The second step is a brainstorming among participants who are interested in financial pyramids. The results of the study are rated lists of * methods of attracting participants by the organizers (by channels and content), * characteristics of a person who is a potential participant in financial pyramids, * attractive features of high-yield risky schemes, * reasons why participants in high-yield risky schemes lose their investments. Academic and practical experts in the financial field have verified the results.\",\"PeriodicalId\":43842,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Institutional Studies\",\"volume\":\"61 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-06-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Institutional Studies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.17835/2076-6297.2023.15.2.024-044\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"ECONOMICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Institutional Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17835/2076-6297.2023.15.2.024-044","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

欺诈计划的数字化转型过程包括金融金字塔。金融金字塔的存在可以追溯到几百年前。这种现象正在稳步再现,然而,数字化为组织者提供了前所未有的机会,使他们可以逃避责任和计划本身的额外属性,导致近年来金字塔数量的爆炸式增长。研究的目的是了解是否存在“数字金融金字塔”现象,如果存在,确定其标准。我们采用两步研究程序。第一步是众包,由志愿者从俄罗斯银行的名单中收集金字塔样本的信息。第二步是在对金融金字塔感兴趣的参与者之间进行头脑风暴。研究的结果是*组织者吸引参与者的方法(按渠道和内容),*金融金字塔潜在参与者的特征,*高收益风险计划的吸引力特征,*高收益风险计划的参与者失去投资的原因。金融领域的学术和实践专家已经验证了这一结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Digital Financial Pyramids Through the Lens of Collective Expert Assessment
The process of digital transformation of fraudulent schemes includes the financial pyramids. The existence of financial pyramids dates back hundreds of year. The phenomenon is steadily reproducing, however, digitalization has given unprecedented opportunities for the organizers to avoid responsibility and additional properties of the schemes themselves, causing an explosive increase in the number of pyramids in recent years. The objective of the study is to understand, whether there is a phenomenon of “digital financial pyramid”, and if so, to identify the it’s criteria. We use a two-step research procedure. The first step is crowdsourcing as a collection of information about a sample of pyramids from the list of the Bank of Russia by volunteers. The second step is a brainstorming among participants who are interested in financial pyramids. The results of the study are rated lists of * methods of attracting participants by the organizers (by channels and content), * characteristics of a person who is a potential participant in financial pyramids, * attractive features of high-yield risky schemes, * reasons why participants in high-yield risky schemes lose their investments. Academic and practical experts in the financial field have verified the results.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
33.30%
发文量
24
审稿时长
8 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信