{"title":"Peres公式在左锁骨下中心静脉置管尖端深度与锁骨上、锁骨下放射学评价的比较","authors":"Mathilda Panggabean, B. Lubis, Luwih Bisono","doi":"10.29322/ijsrp.13.01.2023.p13335","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction : Central Venous Pressure (CVP) is the measure most often used to guide fluid resuscitation in critically ill patients. CVC placement has become common practice for anesthesiologists and intensivists in operating theaters and intensive care units. It is very important to position the catheter tip in the correct position to avoid the consequences of malposition. Objective : To determine the comparison of the accuracy of the tip depth of central venous catheterization in the left subclavian using the Peres formula with evaluation of the radiological images between the supraclavicular and infraclavicular. Methods : This study used a double blind RCT ( Randomized Clinical Trial ) design , ie the research subjects and observers did not know the treatment or intervention given. Sample study are patients who have a central venous catheter installed in the emergency room, ICU, or surgery at the Adam Malik Haji Center General Hospital in Medan who fulfill criteria inclusion and exclusion. Results : The frequency of Supraclavicular samples with incorrect tips was 36 samples (42.4%) and 9 samples (10.6%) were correct. Furthermore, for the experiment using the inflaclavicular as many as 32 samples (37.6%) were not correct, while 8 samples (9.4%) the tip was correct. It is known that the analysis was carried out using the Chi-Square test and it was known that there was no significant relationship between groups with the level of accuracy of central venous catheter tip depth (p = 1.000). Conclusion : The accuracy of central venous catheterization in the left subclavian using the Peres formula supraclavicular and infraclavicular is known to be the same, namely 20.0% or 1 out of 5 procedures directly reaches the carina/region about the fifth thoracic vertebra which does not have a significant difference between infraclavicular and supraclavicular.","PeriodicalId":14290,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Scientific and Research Publications (IJSRP)","volume":"22 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of the Depth of Central Venous Catheterization Tip In The Left Subclavian Using The Peres Formula With Radiological Evaluation Of Supraclavicular And Infraclavicular\",\"authors\":\"Mathilda Panggabean, B. Lubis, Luwih Bisono\",\"doi\":\"10.29322/ijsrp.13.01.2023.p13335\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Introduction : Central Venous Pressure (CVP) is the measure most often used to guide fluid resuscitation in critically ill patients. CVC placement has become common practice for anesthesiologists and intensivists in operating theaters and intensive care units. It is very important to position the catheter tip in the correct position to avoid the consequences of malposition. Objective : To determine the comparison of the accuracy of the tip depth of central venous catheterization in the left subclavian using the Peres formula with evaluation of the radiological images between the supraclavicular and infraclavicular. Methods : This study used a double blind RCT ( Randomized Clinical Trial ) design , ie the research subjects and observers did not know the treatment or intervention given. Sample study are patients who have a central venous catheter installed in the emergency room, ICU, or surgery at the Adam Malik Haji Center General Hospital in Medan who fulfill criteria inclusion and exclusion. Results : The frequency of Supraclavicular samples with incorrect tips was 36 samples (42.4%) and 9 samples (10.6%) were correct. Furthermore, for the experiment using the inflaclavicular as many as 32 samples (37.6%) were not correct, while 8 samples (9.4%) the tip was correct. It is known that the analysis was carried out using the Chi-Square test and it was known that there was no significant relationship between groups with the level of accuracy of central venous catheter tip depth (p = 1.000). Conclusion : The accuracy of central venous catheterization in the left subclavian using the Peres formula supraclavicular and infraclavicular is known to be the same, namely 20.0% or 1 out of 5 procedures directly reaches the carina/region about the fifth thoracic vertebra which does not have a significant difference between infraclavicular and supraclavicular.\",\"PeriodicalId\":14290,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Scientific and Research Publications (IJSRP)\",\"volume\":\"22 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Scientific and Research Publications (IJSRP)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.29322/ijsrp.13.01.2023.p13335\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Scientific and Research Publications (IJSRP)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.29322/ijsrp.13.01.2023.p13335","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
中心静脉压(CVP)是指导危重病人液体复苏最常用的指标。CVC安置已成为手术室和重症监护病房麻醉医师和重症监护医师的常见做法。将导管尖端放置在正确的位置,以避免错位的后果是非常重要的。目的:比较Peres公式在左锁骨下中心静脉置管尖端深度与锁骨上、锁骨下影像的准确性。方法:本研究采用双盲RCT(随机临床试验)设计,即研究对象和观察者不知道给予的治疗或干预措施。样本研究是在棉兰Adam Malik Haji中心综合医院的急诊室、ICU或外科手术中放置中心静脉导管,符合纳入和排除标准的患者。结果:锁骨上标本提示错误36例(42.4%),正确9例(10.6%)。此外,对于使用锁骨下的实验,多达32个样本(37.6%)不正确,而8个样本(9.4%)的尖端是正确的。我们使用卡方检验进行分析,我们知道各组与中心静脉导管尖端深度准确性水平之间没有显著关系(p = 1.000)。结论:采用Peres公式锁骨上和锁骨下左锁骨下中心静脉置管的准确性是相同的,即20.0%或1 / 5的术式直接到达胸椎第5节左右的隆突/区域,锁骨下和锁骨上两种术式间无显著性差异。
Comparison of the Depth of Central Venous Catheterization Tip In The Left Subclavian Using The Peres Formula With Radiological Evaluation Of Supraclavicular And Infraclavicular
Introduction : Central Venous Pressure (CVP) is the measure most often used to guide fluid resuscitation in critically ill patients. CVC placement has become common practice for anesthesiologists and intensivists in operating theaters and intensive care units. It is very important to position the catheter tip in the correct position to avoid the consequences of malposition. Objective : To determine the comparison of the accuracy of the tip depth of central venous catheterization in the left subclavian using the Peres formula with evaluation of the radiological images between the supraclavicular and infraclavicular. Methods : This study used a double blind RCT ( Randomized Clinical Trial ) design , ie the research subjects and observers did not know the treatment or intervention given. Sample study are patients who have a central venous catheter installed in the emergency room, ICU, or surgery at the Adam Malik Haji Center General Hospital in Medan who fulfill criteria inclusion and exclusion. Results : The frequency of Supraclavicular samples with incorrect tips was 36 samples (42.4%) and 9 samples (10.6%) were correct. Furthermore, for the experiment using the inflaclavicular as many as 32 samples (37.6%) were not correct, while 8 samples (9.4%) the tip was correct. It is known that the analysis was carried out using the Chi-Square test and it was known that there was no significant relationship between groups with the level of accuracy of central venous catheter tip depth (p = 1.000). Conclusion : The accuracy of central venous catheterization in the left subclavian using the Peres formula supraclavicular and infraclavicular is known to be the same, namely 20.0% or 1 out of 5 procedures directly reaches the carina/region about the fifth thoracic vertebra which does not have a significant difference between infraclavicular and supraclavicular.