降低壁垒:一年级本科商业教育的综合方法

IF 1.5 Q2 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Mário Fernando, S. Fox, Ruwan Bandara, Daniel Hartley
{"title":"降低壁垒:一年级本科商业教育的综合方法","authors":"Mário Fernando, S. Fox, Ruwan Bandara, Daniel Hartley","doi":"10.1108/jieb-04-2020-0027","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nPurpose\nThe purpose of this study is to examine the nature of interdisciplinary thinking and the conditions and processes that foster it among first-year undergraduate students.\n\n\nDesign/methodology/approach\nThis study with 510 Australian students drawn from 2 cohorts explored an initiative to promote interdisciplinary teaching in an undergraduate ethics-based subject. The study focused on a case-study-based reflective essay intervention to compare the teaching and learning outcomes in the two student cohorts.\n\n\nFindings\nThe results show how a case-study-based reflective essay intervention impacted on interdisciplinary learning. Introducing the case-study-based reflective essay improved interdisciplinary thinking. Findings show that integral to engaging students in interdisciplinary learning is a need for more experiential and active approaches built into education itself.\n\n\nResearch limitations/implications\nThe study findings extend Spelt et al.’s (2009) model in the business education context to link student learning outcomes to the learning processes, learning environment and interdisciplinary thinking. A key limitation of this study is that the intervention is limited to only two student cohorts.\n\n\nPractical implications\nThe study recommends the use of reflective practice in interdisciplinary subjects to support a variety of learning outcomes across disciplines including classroom-based and assignment-based reflective practices which influence interdisciplinary thinking and active learning.\n\n\nOriginality/value\nThere is limited understanding on how business schools should or could attempt to promote interdisciplinary teaching and the actual methods for doing so. This study highlights the significance of integrating reflective practice in undergraduate business education to promote students’ interdisciplinary thinking.\n","PeriodicalId":43809,"journal":{"name":"Journal of International Education in Business","volume":"19 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2020-08-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Lowering the walls: an integrative approach to first-year undergraduate business education\",\"authors\":\"Mário Fernando, S. Fox, Ruwan Bandara, Daniel Hartley\",\"doi\":\"10.1108/jieb-04-2020-0027\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\nPurpose\\nThe purpose of this study is to examine the nature of interdisciplinary thinking and the conditions and processes that foster it among first-year undergraduate students.\\n\\n\\nDesign/methodology/approach\\nThis study with 510 Australian students drawn from 2 cohorts explored an initiative to promote interdisciplinary teaching in an undergraduate ethics-based subject. The study focused on a case-study-based reflective essay intervention to compare the teaching and learning outcomes in the two student cohorts.\\n\\n\\nFindings\\nThe results show how a case-study-based reflective essay intervention impacted on interdisciplinary learning. Introducing the case-study-based reflective essay improved interdisciplinary thinking. Findings show that integral to engaging students in interdisciplinary learning is a need for more experiential and active approaches built into education itself.\\n\\n\\nResearch limitations/implications\\nThe study findings extend Spelt et al.’s (2009) model in the business education context to link student learning outcomes to the learning processes, learning environment and interdisciplinary thinking. A key limitation of this study is that the intervention is limited to only two student cohorts.\\n\\n\\nPractical implications\\nThe study recommends the use of reflective practice in interdisciplinary subjects to support a variety of learning outcomes across disciplines including classroom-based and assignment-based reflective practices which influence interdisciplinary thinking and active learning.\\n\\n\\nOriginality/value\\nThere is limited understanding on how business schools should or could attempt to promote interdisciplinary teaching and the actual methods for doing so. This study highlights the significance of integrating reflective practice in undergraduate business education to promote students’ interdisciplinary thinking.\\n\",\"PeriodicalId\":43809,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of International Education in Business\",\"volume\":\"19 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-08-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"5\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of International Education in Business\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1108/jieb-04-2020-0027\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of International Education in Business","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/jieb-04-2020-0027","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

摘要

目的本研究的目的是考察本科一年级学生跨学科思维的本质,以及培养跨学科思维的条件和过程。设计/方法/方法本研究从两个队列中抽取了510名澳大利亚学生,探讨了在本科伦理学学科中促进跨学科教学的举措。研究的重点是基于案例研究的反思性论文干预,以比较两个学生队列的教学和学习成果。研究结果显示了基于案例研究的反思性论文干预对跨学科学习的影响。引入基于案例研究的反思性论文,提高了跨学科思维。研究结果表明,让学生参与跨学科学习的必要条件是,教育本身需要更多的经验和积极的方法。研究局限/启示研究结果扩展了斯佩尔特等人(2009)在商业教育背景下的模型,将学生的学习成果与学习过程、学习环境和跨学科思维联系起来。本研究的一个关键限制是干预仅限于两个学生队列。实践意义该研究建议在跨学科学科中使用反思性实践,以支持跨学科的各种学习成果,包括以课堂和作业为基础的反思性实践,这些实践影响跨学科思维和主动学习。独创性/价值对于商学院应该或能够如何尝试促进跨学科教学,以及这样做的实际方法,人们的理解有限。本研究强调了在本科商科教育中整合反思性实践对促进学生跨学科思维的重要意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Lowering the walls: an integrative approach to first-year undergraduate business education
Purpose The purpose of this study is to examine the nature of interdisciplinary thinking and the conditions and processes that foster it among first-year undergraduate students. Design/methodology/approach This study with 510 Australian students drawn from 2 cohorts explored an initiative to promote interdisciplinary teaching in an undergraduate ethics-based subject. The study focused on a case-study-based reflective essay intervention to compare the teaching and learning outcomes in the two student cohorts. Findings The results show how a case-study-based reflective essay intervention impacted on interdisciplinary learning. Introducing the case-study-based reflective essay improved interdisciplinary thinking. Findings show that integral to engaging students in interdisciplinary learning is a need for more experiential and active approaches built into education itself. Research limitations/implications The study findings extend Spelt et al.’s (2009) model in the business education context to link student learning outcomes to the learning processes, learning environment and interdisciplinary thinking. A key limitation of this study is that the intervention is limited to only two student cohorts. Practical implications The study recommends the use of reflective practice in interdisciplinary subjects to support a variety of learning outcomes across disciplines including classroom-based and assignment-based reflective practices which influence interdisciplinary thinking and active learning. Originality/value There is limited understanding on how business schools should or could attempt to promote interdisciplinary teaching and the actual methods for doing so. This study highlights the significance of integrating reflective practice in undergraduate business education to promote students’ interdisciplinary thinking.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of International Education in Business
Journal of International Education in Business EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
6.70%
发文量
19
期刊介绍: The journal of International Education in Business (JIEB) is a peer reviewed journal concerned with theoretical and pedagogic aspects of international education in business schools and its flow-on implications for the workplace. The journal publishes papers that are concerned with: - international education, - cross- and inter-cultural aspects of internationalisation, - internationalisation of business schools, - business school teaching and learning, - academic and social engagement of students, - recruitment and marketing of business education in international contexts, - quality processes with respect to internationalisation, and - global organisations as stakeholders of internationalisation. Theoretical and empirical papers (qualitative and quantitative) as well as case analyses are invited. Papers that explore micro- and macro-perspectives in business and international education are also included.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信