{"title":"多标签多类文本分类的弱学习算法","authors":"Yan-Yong Xu, Xian-zhong Zhou, Zhongyang Guo","doi":"10.1109/ICMLC.2002.1174511","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"To handle the multi-label multiclass text categorization, a weak learning algorithm (WLA) is presented. The main idea of WLA is to find a highly accurate classification rule by combining many weak hypotheses, each of which may be only moderately accurate. We used a separate procedure, called the weak learner, to compute the weak hypotheses, and found a set of weak hypotheses by calling the weak learner repeatedly in a series of rounds. These weak hypotheses were then combined into a single rule called the final hypothesis, and the final hypothesis ranked the possible labels for a given document with the hope that the appropriate labels would appear at the top of the ranking. Using the three designed evaluation measures - ordinary-error, average-coverage and average-precision - our experiments show that the performance of WLA is generally better than the other algorithms on the same dataset.","PeriodicalId":90702,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings. International Conference on Machine Learning and Cybernetics","volume":"168 1","pages":"890-894 vol.2"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2002-11-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Weak learning algorithm for multi-label multiclass text categorization\",\"authors\":\"Yan-Yong Xu, Xian-zhong Zhou, Zhongyang Guo\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/ICMLC.2002.1174511\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"To handle the multi-label multiclass text categorization, a weak learning algorithm (WLA) is presented. The main idea of WLA is to find a highly accurate classification rule by combining many weak hypotheses, each of which may be only moderately accurate. We used a separate procedure, called the weak learner, to compute the weak hypotheses, and found a set of weak hypotheses by calling the weak learner repeatedly in a series of rounds. These weak hypotheses were then combined into a single rule called the final hypothesis, and the final hypothesis ranked the possible labels for a given document with the hope that the appropriate labels would appear at the top of the ranking. Using the three designed evaluation measures - ordinary-error, average-coverage and average-precision - our experiments show that the performance of WLA is generally better than the other algorithms on the same dataset.\",\"PeriodicalId\":90702,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings. International Conference on Machine Learning and Cybernetics\",\"volume\":\"168 1\",\"pages\":\"890-894 vol.2\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2002-11-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings. International Conference on Machine Learning and Cybernetics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICMLC.2002.1174511\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings. International Conference on Machine Learning and Cybernetics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICMLC.2002.1174511","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Weak learning algorithm for multi-label multiclass text categorization
To handle the multi-label multiclass text categorization, a weak learning algorithm (WLA) is presented. The main idea of WLA is to find a highly accurate classification rule by combining many weak hypotheses, each of which may be only moderately accurate. We used a separate procedure, called the weak learner, to compute the weak hypotheses, and found a set of weak hypotheses by calling the weak learner repeatedly in a series of rounds. These weak hypotheses were then combined into a single rule called the final hypothesis, and the final hypothesis ranked the possible labels for a given document with the hope that the appropriate labels would appear at the top of the ranking. Using the three designed evaluation measures - ordinary-error, average-coverage and average-precision - our experiments show that the performance of WLA is generally better than the other algorithms on the same dataset.