Dulbecco’s modified eagle’s medium和minimum essential medium——建立用于评价药物吸收的Caco-2细胞单层模型更适合哪一种?

Xiuwen Wu, Ru-Feng Wang, Ming Yuan, W. Xu, Xiu-wei Yang
{"title":"Dulbecco’s modified eagle’s medium和minimum essential medium——建立用于评价药物吸收的Caco-2细胞单层模型更适合哪一种?","authors":"Xiuwen Wu, Ru-Feng Wang, Ming Yuan, W. Xu, Xiu-wei Yang","doi":"10.1691/PH.2013.2225","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The Caco-2 cell monolayer model is widely used in drug absorption studies. Dulbecco's Modified Eagle's Medium (DMEM) and Minimum Essential Medium (MEM) have been used alternatively in the development of this model, although they are different in composition which may affect the differentiation and junction formation of the Caco-2 cell monolayer. Two Caco-2 cell monolayers cultured in both media were compared herein in order to underlay the standardization of this model. These two monolayers were comparatively evaluated regarding reliability and stability by morphology, transepithelial electrical resistance (TEER), alkaline phosphatase (AKPase) activity and transport experiments. Although the results showed that characteristic microvilli were present at the apical side of both monolayers, the dynamic change of TEER of the monolayer cultured in DMEM was more stable than that cultured in MEM, and AKPase activity of the former was stronger than that of the latter. Furthermore, the quantity of atenolol, a key indicator usually used for assessment of this model, across the monolayer cultured in MEM was significantly more than that cultured in DMEM. Therefore, the Caco-2 monolayer cultured in DMEM was more reliable and stable than that cultured in MEM, and thus the former was preferred for drug absorption investigation in vitro.","PeriodicalId":86039,"journal":{"name":"Die Pharmazie. Beihefte","volume":"109 1","pages":"805-10"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"14","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Dulbecco's modified eagle's medium and minimum essential medium--which one is more preferred for establishment of Caco-2 cell monolayer model used in evaluation of drug absorption?\",\"authors\":\"Xiuwen Wu, Ru-Feng Wang, Ming Yuan, W. Xu, Xiu-wei Yang\",\"doi\":\"10.1691/PH.2013.2225\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The Caco-2 cell monolayer model is widely used in drug absorption studies. Dulbecco's Modified Eagle's Medium (DMEM) and Minimum Essential Medium (MEM) have been used alternatively in the development of this model, although they are different in composition which may affect the differentiation and junction formation of the Caco-2 cell monolayer. Two Caco-2 cell monolayers cultured in both media were compared herein in order to underlay the standardization of this model. These two monolayers were comparatively evaluated regarding reliability and stability by morphology, transepithelial electrical resistance (TEER), alkaline phosphatase (AKPase) activity and transport experiments. Although the results showed that characteristic microvilli were present at the apical side of both monolayers, the dynamic change of TEER of the monolayer cultured in DMEM was more stable than that cultured in MEM, and AKPase activity of the former was stronger than that of the latter. Furthermore, the quantity of atenolol, a key indicator usually used for assessment of this model, across the monolayer cultured in MEM was significantly more than that cultured in DMEM. Therefore, the Caco-2 monolayer cultured in DMEM was more reliable and stable than that cultured in MEM, and thus the former was preferred for drug absorption investigation in vitro.\",\"PeriodicalId\":86039,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Die Pharmazie. Beihefte\",\"volume\":\"109 1\",\"pages\":\"805-10\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2013-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"14\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Die Pharmazie. Beihefte\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1691/PH.2013.2225\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Die Pharmazie. Beihefte","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1691/PH.2013.2225","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 14

摘要

Caco-2细胞单层模型广泛应用于药物吸收研究。Dulbecco's Modified Eagle's Medium (DMEM)和Minimum Essential Medium (MEM)在该模型的开发中被交替使用,尽管它们的成分不同,可能会影响Caco-2细胞单层的分化和连接形成。本文比较了两种培养基中培养的Caco-2细胞单层,以奠定该模型的标准化基础。通过形态学、经上皮电阻(TEER)、碱性磷酸酶(AKPase)活性和转运实验,比较评价了这两种单层膜的可靠性和稳定性。虽然结果显示,两种单分子膜的顶端侧均存在特征微绒毛,但DMEM培养的单分子膜TEER的动态变化比MEM培养的更稳定,且前者的AKPase活性强于后者。此外,通常用于评估该模型的关键指标阿替洛尔(atenolol)在MEM培养的单层中的数量明显多于DMEM培养的单层。因此,DMEM培养的Caco-2单层膜比MEM培养的Caco-2单层膜更可靠、更稳定,因此DMEM培养的Caco-2单层膜更适合体外药物吸收研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Dulbecco's modified eagle's medium and minimum essential medium--which one is more preferred for establishment of Caco-2 cell monolayer model used in evaluation of drug absorption?
The Caco-2 cell monolayer model is widely used in drug absorption studies. Dulbecco's Modified Eagle's Medium (DMEM) and Minimum Essential Medium (MEM) have been used alternatively in the development of this model, although they are different in composition which may affect the differentiation and junction formation of the Caco-2 cell monolayer. Two Caco-2 cell monolayers cultured in both media were compared herein in order to underlay the standardization of this model. These two monolayers were comparatively evaluated regarding reliability and stability by morphology, transepithelial electrical resistance (TEER), alkaline phosphatase (AKPase) activity and transport experiments. Although the results showed that characteristic microvilli were present at the apical side of both monolayers, the dynamic change of TEER of the monolayer cultured in DMEM was more stable than that cultured in MEM, and AKPase activity of the former was stronger than that of the latter. Furthermore, the quantity of atenolol, a key indicator usually used for assessment of this model, across the monolayer cultured in MEM was significantly more than that cultured in DMEM. Therefore, the Caco-2 monolayer cultured in DMEM was more reliable and stable than that cultured in MEM, and thus the former was preferred for drug absorption investigation in vitro.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信