Buiting Hm, Ho Vky, Busink V, Campmans X, Reyners Ak, Smit E, V. D, Sonke Gs
{"title":"患者疾病标签对癌症晚期患者疾病体验的影响:一项定性研究","authors":"Buiting Hm, Ho Vky, Busink V, Campmans X, Reyners Ak, Smit E, V. D, Sonke Gs","doi":"10.47829/coo.2022.61501","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Importance: Advances in oncology have resulted in prolonged disease trajectories, also for patients with incurable cancer. This has induced discussions about the ‘right’ medical terminology. The impact of choosing a specific disease-label on well-being can be high. Objective: To examine the impact of disease labels on disease experience in patients living longer with incurable cancer. Design: Qualitative study based on short conversations in the outpatient clinic in a Dutch comprehensive cancer hospital (2015-2018) supplemented with in-depth interviews from hospitals (2021). Setting: Hospital and home setting (via Zoom) Participants: We included 29 short conversations and 4 indepth interviews with patients with incurable breast and lung cancer, all in stable (but incurable) condition. Main outcome measures: We specifically focused on disease labelling and patient’s mood (positive/negative mindset) during the disease course. Results: A substantial group of patients (n=21) used (or explicitly not used) disease-labels in their short conversations about their disease. They varied in their preference regarding disease-labels (e.g. ‘chronic’, ‘palliative’, ‘human’ etc.). Patients with a more positive stance seemed more comfortable with the label ‘chronic’, whereas patients with a less positive stance seemed to perceive disease-labels such as ‘chronic’ as a lifelong burden. Some patients preferred not to label their disease at all. Healthcare professionals’ use of disease-labels could sometimes distress patients, especially when patients heard different disease-labels from different healthcare professionals. Patients not using any disease-label in their communication (n=12), seemed to be less engaged with their disease. Conclusions: Patients labeling their disease is part of their coping strategy. More research is warranted to explore which disease-labels suit different patients confronted with incurable cancer, best.","PeriodicalId":92766,"journal":{"name":"Clinics of oncology","volume":"42 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Impact of Patients’ Disease-Labels on Disease Experience For Patients Living Longer with Incurable Cancer: A Qualitative Study\",\"authors\":\"Buiting Hm, Ho Vky, Busink V, Campmans X, Reyners Ak, Smit E, V. D, Sonke Gs\",\"doi\":\"10.47829/coo.2022.61501\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Importance: Advances in oncology have resulted in prolonged disease trajectories, also for patients with incurable cancer. This has induced discussions about the ‘right’ medical terminology. The impact of choosing a specific disease-label on well-being can be high. Objective: To examine the impact of disease labels on disease experience in patients living longer with incurable cancer. Design: Qualitative study based on short conversations in the outpatient clinic in a Dutch comprehensive cancer hospital (2015-2018) supplemented with in-depth interviews from hospitals (2021). Setting: Hospital and home setting (via Zoom) Participants: We included 29 short conversations and 4 indepth interviews with patients with incurable breast and lung cancer, all in stable (but incurable) condition. Main outcome measures: We specifically focused on disease labelling and patient’s mood (positive/negative mindset) during the disease course. Results: A substantial group of patients (n=21) used (or explicitly not used) disease-labels in their short conversations about their disease. They varied in their preference regarding disease-labels (e.g. ‘chronic’, ‘palliative’, ‘human’ etc.). Patients with a more positive stance seemed more comfortable with the label ‘chronic’, whereas patients with a less positive stance seemed to perceive disease-labels such as ‘chronic’ as a lifelong burden. Some patients preferred not to label their disease at all. Healthcare professionals’ use of disease-labels could sometimes distress patients, especially when patients heard different disease-labels from different healthcare professionals. Patients not using any disease-label in their communication (n=12), seemed to be less engaged with their disease. Conclusions: Patients labeling their disease is part of their coping strategy. More research is warranted to explore which disease-labels suit different patients confronted with incurable cancer, best.\",\"PeriodicalId\":92766,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinics of oncology\",\"volume\":\"42 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinics of oncology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.47829/coo.2022.61501\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinics of oncology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.47829/coo.2022.61501","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
The Impact of Patients’ Disease-Labels on Disease Experience For Patients Living Longer with Incurable Cancer: A Qualitative Study
Importance: Advances in oncology have resulted in prolonged disease trajectories, also for patients with incurable cancer. This has induced discussions about the ‘right’ medical terminology. The impact of choosing a specific disease-label on well-being can be high. Objective: To examine the impact of disease labels on disease experience in patients living longer with incurable cancer. Design: Qualitative study based on short conversations in the outpatient clinic in a Dutch comprehensive cancer hospital (2015-2018) supplemented with in-depth interviews from hospitals (2021). Setting: Hospital and home setting (via Zoom) Participants: We included 29 short conversations and 4 indepth interviews with patients with incurable breast and lung cancer, all in stable (but incurable) condition. Main outcome measures: We specifically focused on disease labelling and patient’s mood (positive/negative mindset) during the disease course. Results: A substantial group of patients (n=21) used (or explicitly not used) disease-labels in their short conversations about their disease. They varied in their preference regarding disease-labels (e.g. ‘chronic’, ‘palliative’, ‘human’ etc.). Patients with a more positive stance seemed more comfortable with the label ‘chronic’, whereas patients with a less positive stance seemed to perceive disease-labels such as ‘chronic’ as a lifelong burden. Some patients preferred not to label their disease at all. Healthcare professionals’ use of disease-labels could sometimes distress patients, especially when patients heard different disease-labels from different healthcare professionals. Patients not using any disease-label in their communication (n=12), seemed to be less engaged with their disease. Conclusions: Patients labeling their disease is part of their coping strategy. More research is warranted to explore which disease-labels suit different patients confronted with incurable cancer, best.