估计铜的风险价值

IF 3.7 4区 经济学 Q1 BUSINESS, FINANCE
Konstantinos Gkillas , Christoforos Konstantatos , Spyros Papathanasiou , Mark Wohar
{"title":"估计铜的风险价值","authors":"Konstantinos Gkillas ,&nbsp;Christoforos Konstantatos ,&nbsp;Spyros Papathanasiou ,&nbsp;Mark Wohar","doi":"10.1016/j.jcomm.2023.100351","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p><span>We analyze various types of models for Value at Risk (VaR) forecasts for daily copper returns. The period of the analysis is from January 4, 2000 to January 14, 2021 including 5290 daily closing prices. The models considered are GARCH-type models, the Generalized Autoregressive Score model, the Dynamic Quantile Regression model, and the Conditional Autoregressive Value at Risk model specifications. The best model is selected using the Model Confidence Set approach. This approach provides a superior set of models by testing the null hypothesis of equal </span>predictive ability. The findings suggest that the EGARCH model outperforms the rest of the models for the copper commodity under investigation.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":45111,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Commodity Markets","volume":"32 ","pages":"Article 100351"},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Estimation of value at risk for copper\",\"authors\":\"Konstantinos Gkillas ,&nbsp;Christoforos Konstantatos ,&nbsp;Spyros Papathanasiou ,&nbsp;Mark Wohar\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jcomm.2023.100351\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p><span>We analyze various types of models for Value at Risk (VaR) forecasts for daily copper returns. The period of the analysis is from January 4, 2000 to January 14, 2021 including 5290 daily closing prices. The models considered are GARCH-type models, the Generalized Autoregressive Score model, the Dynamic Quantile Regression model, and the Conditional Autoregressive Value at Risk model specifications. The best model is selected using the Model Confidence Set approach. This approach provides a superior set of models by testing the null hypothesis of equal </span>predictive ability. The findings suggest that the EGARCH model outperforms the rest of the models for the copper commodity under investigation.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":45111,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Commodity Markets\",\"volume\":\"32 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100351\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-08-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Commodity Markets\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2405851323000417\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"BUSINESS, FINANCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Commodity Markets","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2405851323000417","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS, FINANCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

我们分析了各种类型的风险价值(VaR)模型预测铜的日收益。分析时间为2000年1月4日至2021年1月14日,包括5290个每日收盘价。考虑的模型有garch型模型、广义自回归评分模型、动态分位数回归模型和条件自回归风险值模型规范。使用模型置信集方法选择最佳模型。这种方法通过检验具有相等预测能力的原假设,提供了一组优越的模型。研究结果表明,EGARCH模型优于所调查的铜商品的其他模型。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Estimation of value at risk for copper

We analyze various types of models for Value at Risk (VaR) forecasts for daily copper returns. The period of the analysis is from January 4, 2000 to January 14, 2021 including 5290 daily closing prices. The models considered are GARCH-type models, the Generalized Autoregressive Score model, the Dynamic Quantile Regression model, and the Conditional Autoregressive Value at Risk model specifications. The best model is selected using the Model Confidence Set approach. This approach provides a superior set of models by testing the null hypothesis of equal predictive ability. The findings suggest that the EGARCH model outperforms the rest of the models for the copper commodity under investigation.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.70
自引率
2.40%
发文量
53
期刊介绍: The purpose of the journal is also to stimulate international dialog among academics, industry participants, traders, investors, and policymakers with mutual interests in commodity markets. The mandate for the journal is to present ongoing work within commodity economics and finance. Topics can be related to financialization of commodity markets; pricing, hedging, and risk analysis of commodity derivatives; risk premia in commodity markets; real option analysis for commodity project investment and production; portfolio allocation including commodities; forecasting in commodity markets; corporate finance for commodity-exposed corporations; econometric/statistical analysis of commodity markets; organization of commodity markets; regulation of commodity markets; local and global commodity trading; and commodity supply chains. Commodity markets in this context are energy markets (including renewables), metal markets, mineral markets, agricultural markets, livestock and fish markets, markets for weather derivatives, emission markets, shipping markets, water, and related markets. This interdisciplinary and trans-disciplinary journal will cover all commodity markets and is thus relevant for a broad audience. Commodity markets are not only of academic interest but also highly relevant for many practitioners, including asset managers, industrial managers, investment bankers, risk managers, and also policymakers in governments, central banks, and supranational institutions.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信