计算机安全的模块化验证

A. Appel
{"title":"计算机安全的模块化验证","authors":"A. Appel","doi":"10.1109/CSF.2016.8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"For many software components, it is useful and important to verify their security. This can be done by an analysis of the software itself, or by isolating the software behind a protection mechanism such as an operating system kernel (virtual-memory protection) or cryptographic authentication (don't accepted untrusted inputs). But the protection mechanisms themselves must then be verified not just for safety but for functional correctness. Several recent projects have demonstrated that formal, deductive functional-correctness verification is now possible for kernels, crypto, and compilers. Here I explain some of the modularity principles that make these verifications possible.","PeriodicalId":6500,"journal":{"name":"2016 IEEE 29th Computer Security Foundations Symposium (CSF)","volume":"6 1","pages":"1-8"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"11","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Modular Verification for Computer Security\",\"authors\":\"A. Appel\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/CSF.2016.8\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"For many software components, it is useful and important to verify their security. This can be done by an analysis of the software itself, or by isolating the software behind a protection mechanism such as an operating system kernel (virtual-memory protection) or cryptographic authentication (don't accepted untrusted inputs). But the protection mechanisms themselves must then be verified not just for safety but for functional correctness. Several recent projects have demonstrated that formal, deductive functional-correctness verification is now possible for kernels, crypto, and compilers. Here I explain some of the modularity principles that make these verifications possible.\",\"PeriodicalId\":6500,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2016 IEEE 29th Computer Security Foundations Symposium (CSF)\",\"volume\":\"6 1\",\"pages\":\"1-8\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"11\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2016 IEEE 29th Computer Security Foundations Symposium (CSF)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/CSF.2016.8\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2016 IEEE 29th Computer Security Foundations Symposium (CSF)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/CSF.2016.8","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 11

摘要

对于许多软件组件来说,验证其安全性是非常有用和重要的。这可以通过分析软件本身来实现,也可以通过在保护机制(如操作系统内核(虚拟内存保护)或加密身份验证(不接受不可信的输入)之后隔离软件来实现。但是,必须验证保护机制本身,不仅是为了安全性,而且是为了功能的正确性。最近的几个项目已经证明,对于内核、加密和编译器来说,正式的、演绎的函数正确性验证现在是可能的。在这里,我将解释一些使这些验证成为可能的模块化原则。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Modular Verification for Computer Security
For many software components, it is useful and important to verify their security. This can be done by an analysis of the software itself, or by isolating the software behind a protection mechanism such as an operating system kernel (virtual-memory protection) or cryptographic authentication (don't accepted untrusted inputs). But the protection mechanisms themselves must then be verified not just for safety but for functional correctness. Several recent projects have demonstrated that formal, deductive functional-correctness verification is now possible for kernels, crypto, and compilers. Here I explain some of the modularity principles that make these verifications possible.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信