潜在器官供体脑死亡判定过程中脑电活动和脑血流“不一致现象”的相关因素

Q4 Medicine
Guixing Xu, Yuan Liao, Ping Yu, Ping Xu, Dong-hua Zheng
{"title":"潜在器官供体脑死亡判定过程中脑电活动和脑血流“不一致现象”的相关因素","authors":"Guixing Xu, Yuan Liao, Ping Yu, Ping Xu, Dong-hua Zheng","doi":"10.3760/CMA.J.ISSN.1671-8925.2020.01.006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective \nTo identify the relative factors for \"incongruent phenomenon\" of brain electrical activity and cerebral blood flow during brain death determination for potential organ donors, and intensify the understanding and cognition of this phenomenon. \n \n \nMethods \nThe clinical data of 127 potential donors accepted donation after brain death (DBD), admitted to our hospital from June 2018 to May 2019, were collected prospectively. All patients preferred brain electrical activity and cerebral blood flow assessments as the confirmatory tests of brain death determination. For patients with \"incongruent phenomenon\", further test of median nerve short latency evoked potential or brain electrical activity and cerebral blood flow assessments after waiting for 24 h were performed to confirm brain death determination again. Fifteen parameters, such as gender, age, time of spontaneous respiration arrest, blood pressure, operative types, neurological examination, neuroimaging index, and serum Na+ level, were selected; univariate and multivariate Logistic regression analyses were used to identify these risk factors related to \"incongruent phenomenon\". \n \n \nResults \nAmong the 127 patients, 22 patients (17.3%) appeared \"incongruent phenomenon\"; 17 (77.2%) had electrical silence earlier than cerebral blood flow arrest, and 5 (22.7%) had cerebral blood flow arrest earlier than electrical silence. Multivariate Logistic analysis showed that age≤14 years (OR=6.250, 95CI: 1.201-32.220, P=0.028), systolic blood pressure≥140 mmHg(OR=7.430, 95CI: 1.621-33.992, P=0.010), primary brain-stem injury (OR=15.890, 95CI: 3.042-82.930, P=0.006), spontaneous respiratory arrest time≤72 h (OR=11.964, 95CI: 3.045-82.932, P=0.006), and unilateral/bilateral decompressive craniectomy (OR=16.281, 95CI: 1.590-89.785, P=0.001) were independent risk factors for \"incongruent phenomenon\". \n \n \nConclusion \n\"Incongruent phenomenon\" is common in confirmatory test of brain death determination in China; patients with age≤14 years, systolic blood pressure≥140 mmHg, primary brain-stem injury, spontaneous respiratory arrest time≤72 h, and decompressive craniectomy (unilateral/bilateral) are more likely to have \"incongruent phenomenon\". \n \n \nKey words: \nOrgan donation; Brain death; Electroencephalogram; Cerebral blood flow; Incongruent phenomenon","PeriodicalId":10104,"journal":{"name":"中华神经医学杂志","volume":"136 1","pages":"36-40"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Relative factors for \\\"incongruent phenomenon\\\" of brain electrical activity and cerebral blood flow during brain death determination for potential organ donors\",\"authors\":\"Guixing Xu, Yuan Liao, Ping Yu, Ping Xu, Dong-hua Zheng\",\"doi\":\"10.3760/CMA.J.ISSN.1671-8925.2020.01.006\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Objective \\nTo identify the relative factors for \\\"incongruent phenomenon\\\" of brain electrical activity and cerebral blood flow during brain death determination for potential organ donors, and intensify the understanding and cognition of this phenomenon. \\n \\n \\nMethods \\nThe clinical data of 127 potential donors accepted donation after brain death (DBD), admitted to our hospital from June 2018 to May 2019, were collected prospectively. All patients preferred brain electrical activity and cerebral blood flow assessments as the confirmatory tests of brain death determination. For patients with \\\"incongruent phenomenon\\\", further test of median nerve short latency evoked potential or brain electrical activity and cerebral blood flow assessments after waiting for 24 h were performed to confirm brain death determination again. Fifteen parameters, such as gender, age, time of spontaneous respiration arrest, blood pressure, operative types, neurological examination, neuroimaging index, and serum Na+ level, were selected; univariate and multivariate Logistic regression analyses were used to identify these risk factors related to \\\"incongruent phenomenon\\\". \\n \\n \\nResults \\nAmong the 127 patients, 22 patients (17.3%) appeared \\\"incongruent phenomenon\\\"; 17 (77.2%) had electrical silence earlier than cerebral blood flow arrest, and 5 (22.7%) had cerebral blood flow arrest earlier than electrical silence. Multivariate Logistic analysis showed that age≤14 years (OR=6.250, 95CI: 1.201-32.220, P=0.028), systolic blood pressure≥140 mmHg(OR=7.430, 95CI: 1.621-33.992, P=0.010), primary brain-stem injury (OR=15.890, 95CI: 3.042-82.930, P=0.006), spontaneous respiratory arrest time≤72 h (OR=11.964, 95CI: 3.045-82.932, P=0.006), and unilateral/bilateral decompressive craniectomy (OR=16.281, 95CI: 1.590-89.785, P=0.001) were independent risk factors for \\\"incongruent phenomenon\\\". \\n \\n \\nConclusion \\n\\\"Incongruent phenomenon\\\" is common in confirmatory test of brain death determination in China; patients with age≤14 years, systolic blood pressure≥140 mmHg, primary brain-stem injury, spontaneous respiratory arrest time≤72 h, and decompressive craniectomy (unilateral/bilateral) are more likely to have \\\"incongruent phenomenon\\\". \\n \\n \\nKey words: \\nOrgan donation; Brain death; Electroencephalogram; Cerebral blood flow; Incongruent phenomenon\",\"PeriodicalId\":10104,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"中华神经医学杂志\",\"volume\":\"136 1\",\"pages\":\"36-40\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-01-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"中华神经医学杂志\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3760/CMA.J.ISSN.1671-8925.2020.01.006\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"中华神经医学杂志","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3760/CMA.J.ISSN.1671-8925.2020.01.006","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的探讨潜在器官供体脑死亡判定过程中脑电活动与脑血流量“不一致现象”的相关因素,加强对这一现象的认识和认识。方法前瞻性收集我院2018年6月至2019年5月收治的127例脑死亡后接受捐赠的潜在供者的临床资料。所有患者首选脑电活动和脑血流量评估作为确定脑死亡的确证试验。对于出现“不一致现象”的患者,在等待24 h后进一步进行正中神经短潜伏期诱发电位或脑电活动测试和脑血流量评估,再次确认脑死亡判定。选取性别、年龄、自主呼吸停止时间、血压、手术类型、神经学检查、神经影像学指标、血清Na+水平等15个参数;采用单因素和多因素Logistic回归分析,确定与“不一致现象”相关的危险因素。结果127例患者中有22例(17.3%)出现“不一致现象”;电沉默早于脑血流停止17例(77.2%),脑血流停止早于电沉默5例(22.7%)。多因素Logistic分析显示,年龄≤14岁(OR=6.250, 95CI: 1.201 ~ 32.220, P=0.028)、收缩压≥140 mmHg(OR=7.430, 95CI: 1.621 ~ 33.992, P=0.010)、原发性脑干损伤(OR=15.890, 95CI: 3.042 ~ 82.930, P=0.006)、自主呼吸停止时间≤72 h (OR=11.964, 95CI: 3.045 ~ 82.932, P=0.006)、单侧/双侧开颅减压手术(OR=16.281, 95CI: 1.590 ~ 89.785, P=0.001)是“不一致现象”的独立危险因素。结论中国脑死亡判定确证试验中存在“不一致现象”;年龄≤14岁、收缩压≥140 mmHg、原发脑干损伤、自主呼吸停止时间≤72 h、开颅减压术(单侧/双侧)的患者更容易出现“不一致现象”。关键词:器官捐献;脑死亡;脑电图;脑血流量;不一致的现象
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Relative factors for "incongruent phenomenon" of brain electrical activity and cerebral blood flow during brain death determination for potential organ donors
Objective To identify the relative factors for "incongruent phenomenon" of brain electrical activity and cerebral blood flow during brain death determination for potential organ donors, and intensify the understanding and cognition of this phenomenon. Methods The clinical data of 127 potential donors accepted donation after brain death (DBD), admitted to our hospital from June 2018 to May 2019, were collected prospectively. All patients preferred brain electrical activity and cerebral blood flow assessments as the confirmatory tests of brain death determination. For patients with "incongruent phenomenon", further test of median nerve short latency evoked potential or brain electrical activity and cerebral blood flow assessments after waiting for 24 h were performed to confirm brain death determination again. Fifteen parameters, such as gender, age, time of spontaneous respiration arrest, blood pressure, operative types, neurological examination, neuroimaging index, and serum Na+ level, were selected; univariate and multivariate Logistic regression analyses were used to identify these risk factors related to "incongruent phenomenon". Results Among the 127 patients, 22 patients (17.3%) appeared "incongruent phenomenon"; 17 (77.2%) had electrical silence earlier than cerebral blood flow arrest, and 5 (22.7%) had cerebral blood flow arrest earlier than electrical silence. Multivariate Logistic analysis showed that age≤14 years (OR=6.250, 95CI: 1.201-32.220, P=0.028), systolic blood pressure≥140 mmHg(OR=7.430, 95CI: 1.621-33.992, P=0.010), primary brain-stem injury (OR=15.890, 95CI: 3.042-82.930, P=0.006), spontaneous respiratory arrest time≤72 h (OR=11.964, 95CI: 3.045-82.932, P=0.006), and unilateral/bilateral decompressive craniectomy (OR=16.281, 95CI: 1.590-89.785, P=0.001) were independent risk factors for "incongruent phenomenon". Conclusion "Incongruent phenomenon" is common in confirmatory test of brain death determination in China; patients with age≤14 years, systolic blood pressure≥140 mmHg, primary brain-stem injury, spontaneous respiratory arrest time≤72 h, and decompressive craniectomy (unilateral/bilateral) are more likely to have "incongruent phenomenon". Key words: Organ donation; Brain death; Electroencephalogram; Cerebral blood flow; Incongruent phenomenon
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
中华神经医学杂志
中华神经医学杂志 Psychology-Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
6272
期刊介绍:
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信