对美国事先授权政策净收益的估计

R. Popovian, Wayne Winegarden
{"title":"对美国事先授权政策净收益的估计","authors":"R. Popovian, Wayne Winegarden","doi":"10.36648/1791-809X.21.15.833","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"While originally a clinical tool, prior authorization policies administered by pharmacy benefit managers (PBM) and insurers of biopharmaceuticals are now primarily designed to manage costs. Prior authorization requirements are associated with reduced drug spending (the financial benefit), but they also impose administrative costs on providers, insurance plans, and employer-sponsored plans. Prior authorizations also worsen patient adherence to their prescribed medicines, which is associated with increases in overall healthcare spending. This analysis develops a model utilizing published estimates to quantify the costs created by prior authorizations compared to the financial benefits as measured by the reduced drug spending. Based on our analysis, healthcare costs associated with prior authorizations exceed the benefits of reduced drug spending increasing total healthcare spending by $1.9 billion per year. While additional research evaluating the net benefit from prior authorization policies is necessary, our analysis indicates that prior authorization policies as an administrative tool cannot be justified based on their net financial impact on the healthcare sector.","PeriodicalId":12868,"journal":{"name":"Health science journal","volume":"5 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"An Estimate of the Net Benefits from Prior Authorization Policies in the U.S.\",\"authors\":\"R. Popovian, Wayne Winegarden\",\"doi\":\"10.36648/1791-809X.21.15.833\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"While originally a clinical tool, prior authorization policies administered by pharmacy benefit managers (PBM) and insurers of biopharmaceuticals are now primarily designed to manage costs. Prior authorization requirements are associated with reduced drug spending (the financial benefit), but they also impose administrative costs on providers, insurance plans, and employer-sponsored plans. Prior authorizations also worsen patient adherence to their prescribed medicines, which is associated with increases in overall healthcare spending. This analysis develops a model utilizing published estimates to quantify the costs created by prior authorizations compared to the financial benefits as measured by the reduced drug spending. Based on our analysis, healthcare costs associated with prior authorizations exceed the benefits of reduced drug spending increasing total healthcare spending by $1.9 billion per year. While additional research evaluating the net benefit from prior authorization policies is necessary, our analysis indicates that prior authorization policies as an administrative tool cannot be justified based on their net financial impact on the healthcare sector.\",\"PeriodicalId\":12868,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Health science journal\",\"volume\":\"5 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Health science journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.36648/1791-809X.21.15.833\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health science journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.36648/1791-809X.21.15.833","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

虽然最初是一种临床工具,但由药房福利管理人员(PBM)和生物制药保险公司管理的事先授权政策现在主要用于管理成本。事先授权要求与减少药物支出(经济利益)有关,但它们也对提供者、保险计划和雇主赞助的计划施加了管理成本。事先授权还会使患者对处方药的依从性恶化,这与总体医疗保健支出的增加有关。该分析开发了一个模型,利用已公布的估计来量化先前授权所产生的成本,并将其与通过减少药物支出来衡量的经济效益进行比较。根据我们的分析,与预先授权相关的医疗保健成本超过了减少药物支出的好处,每年增加19亿美元的医疗保健总支出。虽然有必要进行额外的研究,评估预先授权策略的净收益,但我们的分析表明,不能根据其对医疗保健部门的净财务影响来证明将预先授权策略作为一种管理工具是合理的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
An Estimate of the Net Benefits from Prior Authorization Policies in the U.S.
While originally a clinical tool, prior authorization policies administered by pharmacy benefit managers (PBM) and insurers of biopharmaceuticals are now primarily designed to manage costs. Prior authorization requirements are associated with reduced drug spending (the financial benefit), but they also impose administrative costs on providers, insurance plans, and employer-sponsored plans. Prior authorizations also worsen patient adherence to their prescribed medicines, which is associated with increases in overall healthcare spending. This analysis develops a model utilizing published estimates to quantify the costs created by prior authorizations compared to the financial benefits as measured by the reduced drug spending. Based on our analysis, healthcare costs associated with prior authorizations exceed the benefits of reduced drug spending increasing total healthcare spending by $1.9 billion per year. While additional research evaluating the net benefit from prior authorization policies is necessary, our analysis indicates that prior authorization policies as an administrative tool cannot be justified based on their net financial impact on the healthcare sector.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信