{"title":"违反假设:为什么全面质量管理在象牙塔里不起作用","authors":"Lawrence R. Jauch, Robert A. Orwig","doi":"10.1016/S1084-8568(97)90008-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This paper argues that the assumptions underlying Total Quality Management (TQM) suggest that implementation of TQM into the academic function of teaching in higher education is problematical at best. The authors examine the assumptions of continuous improvement, customer focus and management systems needed to implement TQM. It's concluded that those assumptions do not fit the higher education context or culture.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100829,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Quality Management","volume":"2 2","pages":"Pages 279-292"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1997-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/S1084-8568(97)90008-0","citationCount":"57","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A violation of assumptions: Why TQM won't work in the ivory tower\",\"authors\":\"Lawrence R. Jauch, Robert A. Orwig\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/S1084-8568(97)90008-0\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>This paper argues that the assumptions underlying Total Quality Management (TQM) suggest that implementation of TQM into the academic function of teaching in higher education is problematical at best. The authors examine the assumptions of continuous improvement, customer focus and management systems needed to implement TQM. It's concluded that those assumptions do not fit the higher education context or culture.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":100829,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Quality Management\",\"volume\":\"2 2\",\"pages\":\"Pages 279-292\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1997-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/S1084-8568(97)90008-0\",\"citationCount\":\"57\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Quality Management\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1084856897900080\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Quality Management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1084856897900080","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
A violation of assumptions: Why TQM won't work in the ivory tower
This paper argues that the assumptions underlying Total Quality Management (TQM) suggest that implementation of TQM into the academic function of teaching in higher education is problematical at best. The authors examine the assumptions of continuous improvement, customer focus and management systems needed to implement TQM. It's concluded that those assumptions do not fit the higher education context or culture.