违反假设:为什么全面质量管理在象牙塔里不起作用

Lawrence R. Jauch, Robert A. Orwig
{"title":"违反假设:为什么全面质量管理在象牙塔里不起作用","authors":"Lawrence R. Jauch,&nbsp;Robert A. Orwig","doi":"10.1016/S1084-8568(97)90008-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This paper argues that the assumptions underlying Total Quality Management (TQM) suggest that implementation of TQM into the academic function of teaching in higher education is problematical at best. The authors examine the assumptions of continuous improvement, customer focus and management systems needed to implement TQM. It's concluded that those assumptions do not fit the higher education context or culture.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100829,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Quality Management","volume":"2 2","pages":"Pages 279-292"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1997-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/S1084-8568(97)90008-0","citationCount":"57","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A violation of assumptions: Why TQM won't work in the ivory tower\",\"authors\":\"Lawrence R. Jauch,&nbsp;Robert A. Orwig\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/S1084-8568(97)90008-0\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>This paper argues that the assumptions underlying Total Quality Management (TQM) suggest that implementation of TQM into the academic function of teaching in higher education is problematical at best. The authors examine the assumptions of continuous improvement, customer focus and management systems needed to implement TQM. It's concluded that those assumptions do not fit the higher education context or culture.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":100829,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Quality Management\",\"volume\":\"2 2\",\"pages\":\"Pages 279-292\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1997-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/S1084-8568(97)90008-0\",\"citationCount\":\"57\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Quality Management\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1084856897900080\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Quality Management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1084856897900080","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 57

摘要

本文认为,全面质量管理(TQM)的基本假设表明,在高等教育教学的学术功能中实施全面质量管理是有问题的。作者考察了实施TQM所需的持续改进、以客户为中心和管理系统的假设。结论是,这些假设不符合高等教育的背景或文化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A violation of assumptions: Why TQM won't work in the ivory tower

This paper argues that the assumptions underlying Total Quality Management (TQM) suggest that implementation of TQM into the academic function of teaching in higher education is problematical at best. The authors examine the assumptions of continuous improvement, customer focus and management systems needed to implement TQM. It's concluded that those assumptions do not fit the higher education context or culture.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信