人群计数中的深度学习:调查

IF 8.4 2区 计算机科学 Q1 COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE
Lijia Deng, Qinghua Zhou, Shuihua Wang, Juan Manuel Górriz, Yudong Zhang
{"title":"人群计数中的深度学习:调查","authors":"Lijia Deng,&nbsp;Qinghua Zhou,&nbsp;Shuihua Wang,&nbsp;Juan Manuel Górriz,&nbsp;Yudong Zhang","doi":"10.1049/cit2.12241","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Counting high-density objects quickly and accurately is a popular area of research. Crowd counting has significant social and economic value and is a major focus in artificial intelligence. Despite many advancements in this field, many of them are not widely known, especially in terms of research data. The authors proposed a three-tier standardised dataset taxonomy (TSDT). The Taxonomy divides datasets into small-scale, large-scale and hyper-scale, according to different application scenarios. This theory can help researchers make more efficient use of datasets and improve the performance of AI algorithms in specific fields. Additionally, the authors proposed a new evaluation index for the clarity of the dataset: average pixel occupied by each object (APO). This new evaluation index is more suitable for evaluating the clarity of the dataset in the object counting task than the image resolution. Moreover, the authors classified the crowd counting methods from a data-driven perspective: multi-scale networks, single-column networks, multi-column networks, multi-task networks, attention networks and weak-supervised networks and introduced the classic crowd counting methods of each class. The authors classified the existing 36 datasets according to the theory of three-tier standardised dataset taxonomy and discussed and evaluated these datasets. The authors evaluated the performance of more than 100 methods in the past five years on different levels of popular datasets. Recently, progress in research on small-scale datasets has slowed down. There are few new datasets and algorithms on small-scale datasets. The studies focused on large or hyper-scale datasets appear to be reaching a saturation point. The combined use of multiple approaches began to be a major research direction. The authors discussed the theoretical and practical challenges of crowd counting from the perspective of data, algorithms and computing resources. The field of crowd counting is moving towards combining multiple methods and requires fresh, targeted datasets. Despite advancements, the field still faces challenges such as handling real-world scenarios and processing large crowds in real-time. Researchers are exploring transfer learning to overcome the limitations of small datasets. The development of effective algorithms for crowd counting remains a challenging and important task in computer vision and AI, with many opportunities for future research.</p>","PeriodicalId":46211,"journal":{"name":"CAAI Transactions on Intelligence Technology","volume":"9 5","pages":"1043-1077"},"PeriodicalIF":8.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1049/cit2.12241","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Deep learning in crowd counting: A survey\",\"authors\":\"Lijia Deng,&nbsp;Qinghua Zhou,&nbsp;Shuihua Wang,&nbsp;Juan Manuel Górriz,&nbsp;Yudong Zhang\",\"doi\":\"10.1049/cit2.12241\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Counting high-density objects quickly and accurately is a popular area of research. Crowd counting has significant social and economic value and is a major focus in artificial intelligence. Despite many advancements in this field, many of them are not widely known, especially in terms of research data. The authors proposed a three-tier standardised dataset taxonomy (TSDT). The Taxonomy divides datasets into small-scale, large-scale and hyper-scale, according to different application scenarios. This theory can help researchers make more efficient use of datasets and improve the performance of AI algorithms in specific fields. Additionally, the authors proposed a new evaluation index for the clarity of the dataset: average pixel occupied by each object (APO). This new evaluation index is more suitable for evaluating the clarity of the dataset in the object counting task than the image resolution. Moreover, the authors classified the crowd counting methods from a data-driven perspective: multi-scale networks, single-column networks, multi-column networks, multi-task networks, attention networks and weak-supervised networks and introduced the classic crowd counting methods of each class. The authors classified the existing 36 datasets according to the theory of three-tier standardised dataset taxonomy and discussed and evaluated these datasets. The authors evaluated the performance of more than 100 methods in the past five years on different levels of popular datasets. Recently, progress in research on small-scale datasets has slowed down. There are few new datasets and algorithms on small-scale datasets. The studies focused on large or hyper-scale datasets appear to be reaching a saturation point. The combined use of multiple approaches began to be a major research direction. The authors discussed the theoretical and practical challenges of crowd counting from the perspective of data, algorithms and computing resources. The field of crowd counting is moving towards combining multiple methods and requires fresh, targeted datasets. Despite advancements, the field still faces challenges such as handling real-world scenarios and processing large crowds in real-time. Researchers are exploring transfer learning to overcome the limitations of small datasets. The development of effective algorithms for crowd counting remains a challenging and important task in computer vision and AI, with many opportunities for future research.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":46211,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"CAAI Transactions on Intelligence Technology\",\"volume\":\"9 5\",\"pages\":\"1043-1077\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":8.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-06-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1049/cit2.12241\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"CAAI Transactions on Intelligence Technology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"94\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1049/cit2.12241\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"计算机科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"CAAI Transactions on Intelligence Technology","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1049/cit2.12241","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

快速准确地计数高密度物体是一个热门研究领域。人群计数具有重要的社会和经济价值,也是人工智能的一大重点。尽管该领域取得了许多进展,但其中许多并不广为人知,尤其是在研究数据方面。作者提出了三层标准化数据集分类法(TSDT)。该分类法根据不同的应用场景将数据集分为小规模、大规模和超大规模。这一理论可以帮助研究人员更有效地利用数据集,提高人工智能算法在特定领域的性能。此外,作者还为数据集的清晰度提出了一个新的评价指标:每个物体所占的平均像素(APO)。与图像分辨率相比,这一新的评价指标更适合用于评价物体计数任务中数据集的清晰度。此外,作者还从数据驱动的角度对人群计数方法进行了分类:多尺度网络、单列网络、多列网络、多任务网络、注意力网络和弱监督网络,并介绍了每一类中的经典人群计数方法。作者根据三级标准化数据集分类理论对现有的 36 个数据集进行了分类,并对这些数据集进行了讨论和评估。作者评估了过去五年中 100 多种方法在不同级别的流行数据集上的性能。最近,小规模数据集的研究进展有所放缓。关于小规模数据集的新数据集和算法很少。针对大规模或超大规模数据集的研究似乎已达到饱和点。多种方法的结合使用开始成为一个主要的研究方向。作者从数据、算法和计算资源的角度讨论了人群计数的理论和实践挑战。人群统计领域正朝着多种方法相结合的方向发展,需要全新的、有针对性的数据集。尽管取得了进步,该领域仍然面临着挑战,如处理真实世界场景和实时处理大量人群。研究人员正在探索迁移学习,以克服小数据集的局限性。开发有效的人群计数算法仍然是计算机视觉和人工智能领域一项具有挑战性的重要任务,未来的研究还有很多机会。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Deep learning in crowd counting: A survey

Deep learning in crowd counting: A survey

Counting high-density objects quickly and accurately is a popular area of research. Crowd counting has significant social and economic value and is a major focus in artificial intelligence. Despite many advancements in this field, many of them are not widely known, especially in terms of research data. The authors proposed a three-tier standardised dataset taxonomy (TSDT). The Taxonomy divides datasets into small-scale, large-scale and hyper-scale, according to different application scenarios. This theory can help researchers make more efficient use of datasets and improve the performance of AI algorithms in specific fields. Additionally, the authors proposed a new evaluation index for the clarity of the dataset: average pixel occupied by each object (APO). This new evaluation index is more suitable for evaluating the clarity of the dataset in the object counting task than the image resolution. Moreover, the authors classified the crowd counting methods from a data-driven perspective: multi-scale networks, single-column networks, multi-column networks, multi-task networks, attention networks and weak-supervised networks and introduced the classic crowd counting methods of each class. The authors classified the existing 36 datasets according to the theory of three-tier standardised dataset taxonomy and discussed and evaluated these datasets. The authors evaluated the performance of more than 100 methods in the past five years on different levels of popular datasets. Recently, progress in research on small-scale datasets has slowed down. There are few new datasets and algorithms on small-scale datasets. The studies focused on large or hyper-scale datasets appear to be reaching a saturation point. The combined use of multiple approaches began to be a major research direction. The authors discussed the theoretical and practical challenges of crowd counting from the perspective of data, algorithms and computing resources. The field of crowd counting is moving towards combining multiple methods and requires fresh, targeted datasets. Despite advancements, the field still faces challenges such as handling real-world scenarios and processing large crowds in real-time. Researchers are exploring transfer learning to overcome the limitations of small datasets. The development of effective algorithms for crowd counting remains a challenging and important task in computer vision and AI, with many opportunities for future research.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CAAI Transactions on Intelligence Technology
CAAI Transactions on Intelligence Technology COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE-
CiteScore
11.00
自引率
3.90%
发文量
134
审稿时长
35 weeks
期刊介绍: CAAI Transactions on Intelligence Technology is a leading venue for original research on the theoretical and experimental aspects of artificial intelligence technology. We are a fully open access journal co-published by the Institution of Engineering and Technology (IET) and the Chinese Association for Artificial Intelligence (CAAI) providing research which is openly accessible to read and share worldwide.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信