Firda Nur Fauzia, Sri Pujiningsih, Makaryanawati Makaryanawati
{"title":"印尼公共会计欺诈倾向的决定因素","authors":"Firda Nur Fauzia, Sri Pujiningsih, Makaryanawati Makaryanawati","doi":"10.33146/2307-9878-2022-4(98)-13-22","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Accounting fraud is the intentional manipulation of accounting data to create a false appearance of corporate financial health or obtain personal benefits. If problems like this occur continuously, it will cause fraud that is detrimental to many parties. Therefore, efforts to minimize fraud need to do an in-depth analysis of the causes of fraud. One of them is analyzing the tendency of public accountant fraud through the fraud hexagon perspective. Georgios L. Vousinas developed the fraud hexagon in 2019. The fraud hexagon explains that fraud can occur due to six factors, namely, 1) pressure, 2) opportunity, 3) rationalization, 4) capability, 5) arrogance and 6) collusion. This theoretical concept is the basis of this research. This research aims to obtain empirical evidence regarding the influence of the fraud hexagon factor on the tendency of public accountant fraud accompanied by a moderating variable of professional ethics. The questionnaire method was used to collect data for analysis. The sample in this study is all public accountants working at public accounting firms registered with the Indonesian Ministry of Finance (Kementerian Keuangan) in 2022. The total sample is 107 respondents. To analyze data Moderated Regression Analysis (MRA) was used. The results of this study are pressure, rationalization, opportunity, capability, and arrogance do not affect public accountant fraud tendencies. Collusion is a factor that influences the tendency of public accountants to commit fraud. The ethics of the accounting profession do not moderate the hexagon fraud factor's effect on public accountants' tendency to commit fraud. Other related parties can use the results of this study to prevent public accountant fraud through policies related to collusive practices because only collusion increases the desire of public accountants to commit fraud.","PeriodicalId":33375,"journal":{"name":"Oblik i finansi","volume":"434 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Determinants of Fraudulent Tendencies on Public Accountancy in Indonesia\",\"authors\":\"Firda Nur Fauzia, Sri Pujiningsih, Makaryanawati Makaryanawati\",\"doi\":\"10.33146/2307-9878-2022-4(98)-13-22\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Accounting fraud is the intentional manipulation of accounting data to create a false appearance of corporate financial health or obtain personal benefits. If problems like this occur continuously, it will cause fraud that is detrimental to many parties. Therefore, efforts to minimize fraud need to do an in-depth analysis of the causes of fraud. One of them is analyzing the tendency of public accountant fraud through the fraud hexagon perspective. Georgios L. Vousinas developed the fraud hexagon in 2019. The fraud hexagon explains that fraud can occur due to six factors, namely, 1) pressure, 2) opportunity, 3) rationalization, 4) capability, 5) arrogance and 6) collusion. This theoretical concept is the basis of this research. This research aims to obtain empirical evidence regarding the influence of the fraud hexagon factor on the tendency of public accountant fraud accompanied by a moderating variable of professional ethics. The questionnaire method was used to collect data for analysis. The sample in this study is all public accountants working at public accounting firms registered with the Indonesian Ministry of Finance (Kementerian Keuangan) in 2022. The total sample is 107 respondents. To analyze data Moderated Regression Analysis (MRA) was used. The results of this study are pressure, rationalization, opportunity, capability, and arrogance do not affect public accountant fraud tendencies. Collusion is a factor that influences the tendency of public accountants to commit fraud. The ethics of the accounting profession do not moderate the hexagon fraud factor's effect on public accountants' tendency to commit fraud. Other related parties can use the results of this study to prevent public accountant fraud through policies related to collusive practices because only collusion increases the desire of public accountants to commit fraud.\",\"PeriodicalId\":33375,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Oblik i finansi\",\"volume\":\"434 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Oblik i finansi\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.33146/2307-9878-2022-4(98)-13-22\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Oblik i finansi","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33146/2307-9878-2022-4(98)-13-22","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
会计欺诈是故意操纵会计数据,以制造企业财务健康的虚假表象或获取个人利益。如果这样的问题持续发生,就会造成对多方不利的欺诈行为。因此,努力减少舞弊需要对舞弊的原因做深入的分析。其中之一是通过舞弊六边形视角分析我国会计师舞弊的倾向。Georgios L. Vousinas于2019年开发了欺诈六边形。欺诈六边形解释了欺诈可能发生的六个因素,即1)压力,2)机会,3)合理化,4)能力,5)傲慢和6)勾结。这一理论概念是本研究的基础。本研究旨在获得舞弊六边形因子对会计师舞弊倾向影响的实证证据,并伴随着职业道德的调节变量。采用问卷调查法收集数据进行分析。本研究的样本为2022年在印尼财政部(Kementerian Keuangan)注册的会计师事务所工作的所有会计师。样本总数为107人。采用适度回归分析(MRA)对数据进行分析。研究结果表明,压力、合理化、机会、能力和傲慢对会计师舞弊倾向没有影响。合谋是影响会计师舞弊倾向的一个因素。会计职业道德并不能调节六边形舞弊因素对会计师舞弊倾向的影响。其他关联方可以利用本研究的结果,通过与串通行为相关的政策来防止会计师舞弊,因为只有串通行为才会增加会计师舞弊的欲望。
Determinants of Fraudulent Tendencies on Public Accountancy in Indonesia
Accounting fraud is the intentional manipulation of accounting data to create a false appearance of corporate financial health or obtain personal benefits. If problems like this occur continuously, it will cause fraud that is detrimental to many parties. Therefore, efforts to minimize fraud need to do an in-depth analysis of the causes of fraud. One of them is analyzing the tendency of public accountant fraud through the fraud hexagon perspective. Georgios L. Vousinas developed the fraud hexagon in 2019. The fraud hexagon explains that fraud can occur due to six factors, namely, 1) pressure, 2) opportunity, 3) rationalization, 4) capability, 5) arrogance and 6) collusion. This theoretical concept is the basis of this research. This research aims to obtain empirical evidence regarding the influence of the fraud hexagon factor on the tendency of public accountant fraud accompanied by a moderating variable of professional ethics. The questionnaire method was used to collect data for analysis. The sample in this study is all public accountants working at public accounting firms registered with the Indonesian Ministry of Finance (Kementerian Keuangan) in 2022. The total sample is 107 respondents. To analyze data Moderated Regression Analysis (MRA) was used. The results of this study are pressure, rationalization, opportunity, capability, and arrogance do not affect public accountant fraud tendencies. Collusion is a factor that influences the tendency of public accountants to commit fraud. The ethics of the accounting profession do not moderate the hexagon fraud factor's effect on public accountants' tendency to commit fraud. Other related parties can use the results of this study to prevent public accountant fraud through policies related to collusive practices because only collusion increases the desire of public accountants to commit fraud.