猴子和人类的低和高图像内容对眼球运动的差异贡献

N. Wilming, Tim C Kietzmann, M. Jutras, Cheng Xue, S. Treue, E. Buffalo, P. König
{"title":"猴子和人类的低和高图像内容对眼球运动的差异贡献","authors":"N. Wilming, Tim C Kietzmann, M. Jutras, Cheng Xue, S. Treue, E. Buffalo, P. König","doi":"10.1093/cercor/bhw399","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Oculomotor selection exerts a fundamental impact on our experience of the environment. To better understand the underlying principles, researchers typically rely on behavioral data from humans, and electrophysiological recordings in macaque monkeys. This approach rests on the assumption that the same selection processes are at play in both species. To test this assumption, we compared the viewing behavior of 106 humans and 11 macaques in an unconstrained free‐viewing task. Our data‐driven clustering analyses revealed distinct human and macaque clusters, indicating species‐specific selection strategies. Yet, cross‐species predictions were found to be above chance, indicating some level of shared behavior. Analyses relying on computational models of visual saliency indicate that such cross‐species commonalities in free viewing are largely due to similar low‐level selection mechanisms, with only a small contribution by shared higher level selection mechanisms and with consistent viewing behavior of monkeys being a subset of the consistent viewing behavior of humans.","PeriodicalId":9825,"journal":{"name":"Cerebral Cortex (New York, NY)","volume":"178 1","pages":"279 - 293"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Differential Contribution of Low- and High-level Image Content to Eye Movements in Monkeys and Humans\",\"authors\":\"N. Wilming, Tim C Kietzmann, M. Jutras, Cheng Xue, S. Treue, E. Buffalo, P. König\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/cercor/bhw399\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract Oculomotor selection exerts a fundamental impact on our experience of the environment. To better understand the underlying principles, researchers typically rely on behavioral data from humans, and electrophysiological recordings in macaque monkeys. This approach rests on the assumption that the same selection processes are at play in both species. To test this assumption, we compared the viewing behavior of 106 humans and 11 macaques in an unconstrained free‐viewing task. Our data‐driven clustering analyses revealed distinct human and macaque clusters, indicating species‐specific selection strategies. Yet, cross‐species predictions were found to be above chance, indicating some level of shared behavior. Analyses relying on computational models of visual saliency indicate that such cross‐species commonalities in free viewing are largely due to similar low‐level selection mechanisms, with only a small contribution by shared higher level selection mechanisms and with consistent viewing behavior of monkeys being a subset of the consistent viewing behavior of humans.\",\"PeriodicalId\":9825,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cerebral Cortex (New York, NY)\",\"volume\":\"178 1\",\"pages\":\"279 - 293\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"6\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cerebral Cortex (New York, NY)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/cercor/bhw399\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cerebral Cortex (New York, NY)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/cercor/bhw399","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

摘要

眼动选择对我们对环境的体验有着根本性的影响。为了更好地理解潜在的原理,研究人员通常依赖于人类的行为数据和猕猴的电生理记录。这种方法基于这样的假设,即两个物种都经历了相同的选择过程。为了验证这一假设,我们比较了106名人类和11只猕猴在无约束自由观看任务中的观看行为。我们的数据驱动聚类分析揭示了人类和猕猴不同的聚类,这表明了物种特异性的选择策略。然而,跨物种预测被发现高于偶然,表明某种程度上的共同行为。基于视觉显著性计算模型的分析表明,这种自由观看的跨物种共性很大程度上是由于相似的低水平选择机制,只有一小部分是由共享的高水平选择机制造成的,而且猴子的一致观看行为是人类一致观看行为的一个子集。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Differential Contribution of Low- and High-level Image Content to Eye Movements in Monkeys and Humans
Abstract Oculomotor selection exerts a fundamental impact on our experience of the environment. To better understand the underlying principles, researchers typically rely on behavioral data from humans, and electrophysiological recordings in macaque monkeys. This approach rests on the assumption that the same selection processes are at play in both species. To test this assumption, we compared the viewing behavior of 106 humans and 11 macaques in an unconstrained free‐viewing task. Our data‐driven clustering analyses revealed distinct human and macaque clusters, indicating species‐specific selection strategies. Yet, cross‐species predictions were found to be above chance, indicating some level of shared behavior. Analyses relying on computational models of visual saliency indicate that such cross‐species commonalities in free viewing are largely due to similar low‐level selection mechanisms, with only a small contribution by shared higher level selection mechanisms and with consistent viewing behavior of monkeys being a subset of the consistent viewing behavior of humans.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信