过程教学法在写作技巧教学中的应用评价——以卧莱塔地区预科学校为例

Mesfin Mekuria Dangore
{"title":"过程教学法在写作技巧教学中的应用评价——以卧莱塔地区预科学校为例","authors":"Mesfin Mekuria Dangore","doi":"10.20546/ijcrar.2019.704.005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"It is obvious that the English courses offered in different schools are based on the assumption that what is taught and learned in these schools would help students overcome their previous writing problems and write well in their English. The major objective of this study was to assess the implementation of process approach in teaching’ writing skills and to identify kinds of errors the students commit during writing through process approach. To this end, checklists were prepared so as to check the students’ writing skills. Textbook content analysis, teachers’ and students’ questionnaire results, semi-structured interview with teachers and students, and classroom observation results were used. Subjects selected were Wolaita Sodo preparatory school grade 12 students and teachers. Using purposive sampling technique, ten (10) English teachers of grade 12 were included as a sample for this study because they were fewer in number and easily managed. Out of 1200 Grade- 12 students, 300 sample students were taken using top 20 achieving students from 15 sections (section A-to-O) for filling the questionnaire. In relation to this kind of subject selection technique, Mertler (2005) recommends that about 20-25% of the respondents should be selected from the total population. According to his recommendation, this study included 25% of the total population as the student respondents of this work. Concerning the research design, a descriptive research design was used to analyze and interpret the data. The findings of the study indicated that the students’ writing skill is terribly low. Tests were given to the participants and it was found that students couldn’t keep the given good paragraph writing criteria. In effect, students wrote fragmented ideas without giving a complete idea and they were generally found less successful in meeting the writing requirements and expectations of the teachers, specifically; teachers’ expectations in terms of writing skills and English language proficiency because most of the students scored below an average value and also the higher value lied in negative standard deviation and mean. Moreover, both teachers and the students appeared to have different views as to the responsibility of teachers to help students improve their writing skills. However, as a whole, it was found out that the teachers in the Wolaita Sodo Preparatory school appeared to have paid little attention to help their students improve their writing skills though it is possible that some teachers may individually help their students. My observation in the real classroom practice also indicated that some students even couldn’t write a single meaningful sentence let alone writing effective paragraph in the grounds that the teachers and students of grade 12 were not practicing writing skills using process approach. Some factors which hinder the implementation of process approach reported by both teachers and students were shortage of time, low background knowledge in writing, and interest, inappropriate contents and lack of support. By and large, the students written test score performance was very poor; students learn writing in rare cases, which resulted students to be passive in learning writing skills except few students who were found voluntary and motivated while about 225 (75%), out of the total students, were not ok. Students’ motivation to write outside the class was also reported to be low. According to the students’ text book analysis, it was reported that writing exercises found in grade-12 textbooks were not authentic, and as a result, do not show various steps to develop the students’ writing skills, but similar activities were presented in each unit though students at this level must see various forms of academic writings. Therefore, the researcher likes to recommend that students should be given very practical process writing tasks from the very beginning so that they can be able to develop their writing skills step by step, and writing tasks should be given individually in order to minimize the dependence on a single student.","PeriodicalId":13945,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Current Research and Academic Review","volume":"15 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-04-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"An Assessment on the Implementation of Process Approach in Teaching Writing Skills: The Case of Preparatory Schools in Wolaita Zone\",\"authors\":\"Mesfin Mekuria Dangore\",\"doi\":\"10.20546/ijcrar.2019.704.005\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"It is obvious that the English courses offered in different schools are based on the assumption that what is taught and learned in these schools would help students overcome their previous writing problems and write well in their English. The major objective of this study was to assess the implementation of process approach in teaching’ writing skills and to identify kinds of errors the students commit during writing through process approach. To this end, checklists were prepared so as to check the students’ writing skills. Textbook content analysis, teachers’ and students’ questionnaire results, semi-structured interview with teachers and students, and classroom observation results were used. Subjects selected were Wolaita Sodo preparatory school grade 12 students and teachers. Using purposive sampling technique, ten (10) English teachers of grade 12 were included as a sample for this study because they were fewer in number and easily managed. Out of 1200 Grade- 12 students, 300 sample students were taken using top 20 achieving students from 15 sections (section A-to-O) for filling the questionnaire. In relation to this kind of subject selection technique, Mertler (2005) recommends that about 20-25% of the respondents should be selected from the total population. According to his recommendation, this study included 25% of the total population as the student respondents of this work. Concerning the research design, a descriptive research design was used to analyze and interpret the data. The findings of the study indicated that the students’ writing skill is terribly low. Tests were given to the participants and it was found that students couldn’t keep the given good paragraph writing criteria. In effect, students wrote fragmented ideas without giving a complete idea and they were generally found less successful in meeting the writing requirements and expectations of the teachers, specifically; teachers’ expectations in terms of writing skills and English language proficiency because most of the students scored below an average value and also the higher value lied in negative standard deviation and mean. Moreover, both teachers and the students appeared to have different views as to the responsibility of teachers to help students improve their writing skills. However, as a whole, it was found out that the teachers in the Wolaita Sodo Preparatory school appeared to have paid little attention to help their students improve their writing skills though it is possible that some teachers may individually help their students. My observation in the real classroom practice also indicated that some students even couldn’t write a single meaningful sentence let alone writing effective paragraph in the grounds that the teachers and students of grade 12 were not practicing writing skills using process approach. Some factors which hinder the implementation of process approach reported by both teachers and students were shortage of time, low background knowledge in writing, and interest, inappropriate contents and lack of support. By and large, the students written test score performance was very poor; students learn writing in rare cases, which resulted students to be passive in learning writing skills except few students who were found voluntary and motivated while about 225 (75%), out of the total students, were not ok. Students’ motivation to write outside the class was also reported to be low. According to the students’ text book analysis, it was reported that writing exercises found in grade-12 textbooks were not authentic, and as a result, do not show various steps to develop the students’ writing skills, but similar activities were presented in each unit though students at this level must see various forms of academic writings. Therefore, the researcher likes to recommend that students should be given very practical process writing tasks from the very beginning so that they can be able to develop their writing skills step by step, and writing tasks should be given individually in order to minimize the dependence on a single student.\",\"PeriodicalId\":13945,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Current Research and Academic Review\",\"volume\":\"15 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-04-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Current Research and Academic Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.20546/ijcrar.2019.704.005\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Current Research and Academic Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.20546/ijcrar.2019.704.005","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

很明显,不同学校开设的英语课程都是基于这样的假设,即这些学校教的和学的东西会帮助学生克服他们以前的写作问题,用英语写得很好。本研究的主要目的是评估过程教学法在写作技巧教学中的实施情况,并通过过程教学法识别学生在写作过程中所犯的错误。为此,我们准备了检查表,以检查学生的写作能力。采用教材内容分析、师生问卷调查结果、师生半结构化访谈和课堂观察结果。研究对象为沃莱塔索多预备学校12年级学生和教师。由于12年级英语教师人数较少,易于管理,本研究采用有目的的抽样方法,选取了10名12年级英语教师作为研究样本。在1200名12年级学生中,从15个区(a - o区)抽取成绩前20名的学生300名进行问卷调查。关于这种主题选择技术,Mertler(2005)建议从总人口中选择大约20-25%的受访者。根据他的建议,这项研究包括总人口的25%作为这项工作的学生受访者。在研究设计方面,采用描述性研究设计来分析和解释数据。研究结果表明,学生的写作水平非常低。对参与者进行了测试,发现学生无法保持给定的良好段落写作标准。实际上,学生写的是支离破碎的想法,没有给出一个完整的想法,他们通常不太能成功地满足老师的写作要求和期望,特别是;教师对写作能力和英语语言能力的期望,因为大多数学生的得分低于平均值,较高的值为负标准差和平均值。此外,教师和学生似乎对教师帮助学生提高写作技能的责任有不同的看法。然而,作为一个整体,我们发现Wolaita Sodo预科学校的老师似乎很少关注帮助学生提高写作技能,尽管有些老师可能会个别帮助他们的学生。在实际的课堂实践中,我观察到一些学生甚至连一个有意义的句子都写不出来,更不用说有效的段落了,原因是12年级的老师和学生没有使用过程法来练习写作技巧。教师和学生反映的阻碍过程教学法实施的因素有:时间不足、写作背景知识不足、兴趣不足、内容不当和缺乏支持。总的来说,学生的笔试成绩表现很差;学生学习写作的情况很少,这导致学生在学习写作技能方面是被动的,除了少数学生被发现是自愿的和有动力的,而在全体学生中有225名(75%)学生不太好。据报道,学生在课外写作的动力也很低。根据学生的课本分析,据报道,12年级教科书中的写作练习不真实,因此没有显示出培养学生写作技能的各种步骤,但是每个单元都有类似的活动,尽管这个级别的学生必须看到各种形式的学术写作。因此,研究者倾向于建议从一开始就给学生非常实用的过程性写作任务,这样他们就可以一步一步地发展他们的写作技能,并且写作任务应该单独给出,以尽量减少对单个学生的依赖。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
An Assessment on the Implementation of Process Approach in Teaching Writing Skills: The Case of Preparatory Schools in Wolaita Zone
It is obvious that the English courses offered in different schools are based on the assumption that what is taught and learned in these schools would help students overcome their previous writing problems and write well in their English. The major objective of this study was to assess the implementation of process approach in teaching’ writing skills and to identify kinds of errors the students commit during writing through process approach. To this end, checklists were prepared so as to check the students’ writing skills. Textbook content analysis, teachers’ and students’ questionnaire results, semi-structured interview with teachers and students, and classroom observation results were used. Subjects selected were Wolaita Sodo preparatory school grade 12 students and teachers. Using purposive sampling technique, ten (10) English teachers of grade 12 were included as a sample for this study because they were fewer in number and easily managed. Out of 1200 Grade- 12 students, 300 sample students were taken using top 20 achieving students from 15 sections (section A-to-O) for filling the questionnaire. In relation to this kind of subject selection technique, Mertler (2005) recommends that about 20-25% of the respondents should be selected from the total population. According to his recommendation, this study included 25% of the total population as the student respondents of this work. Concerning the research design, a descriptive research design was used to analyze and interpret the data. The findings of the study indicated that the students’ writing skill is terribly low. Tests were given to the participants and it was found that students couldn’t keep the given good paragraph writing criteria. In effect, students wrote fragmented ideas without giving a complete idea and they were generally found less successful in meeting the writing requirements and expectations of the teachers, specifically; teachers’ expectations in terms of writing skills and English language proficiency because most of the students scored below an average value and also the higher value lied in negative standard deviation and mean. Moreover, both teachers and the students appeared to have different views as to the responsibility of teachers to help students improve their writing skills. However, as a whole, it was found out that the teachers in the Wolaita Sodo Preparatory school appeared to have paid little attention to help their students improve their writing skills though it is possible that some teachers may individually help their students. My observation in the real classroom practice also indicated that some students even couldn’t write a single meaningful sentence let alone writing effective paragraph in the grounds that the teachers and students of grade 12 were not practicing writing skills using process approach. Some factors which hinder the implementation of process approach reported by both teachers and students were shortage of time, low background knowledge in writing, and interest, inappropriate contents and lack of support. By and large, the students written test score performance was very poor; students learn writing in rare cases, which resulted students to be passive in learning writing skills except few students who were found voluntary and motivated while about 225 (75%), out of the total students, were not ok. Students’ motivation to write outside the class was also reported to be low. According to the students’ text book analysis, it was reported that writing exercises found in grade-12 textbooks were not authentic, and as a result, do not show various steps to develop the students’ writing skills, but similar activities were presented in each unit though students at this level must see various forms of academic writings. Therefore, the researcher likes to recommend that students should be given very practical process writing tasks from the very beginning so that they can be able to develop their writing skills step by step, and writing tasks should be given individually in order to minimize the dependence on a single student.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信