面向森林立地气孔臭氧通量监测的长期可持续性

Elena Paoletti , Pierre Sicard , Yasutomo Hoshika , Silvano Fares , Ovidiu Badea , Diana Pitar , Ionel Popa , Alessandro Anav , Barbara Baesso Moura , Alessandra De Marco
{"title":"面向森林立地气孔臭氧通量监测的长期可持续性","authors":"Elena Paoletti ,&nbsp;Pierre Sicard ,&nbsp;Yasutomo Hoshika ,&nbsp;Silvano Fares ,&nbsp;Ovidiu Badea ,&nbsp;Diana Pitar ,&nbsp;Ionel Popa ,&nbsp;Alessandro Anav ,&nbsp;Barbara Baesso Moura ,&nbsp;Alessandra De Marco","doi":"10.1016/j.horiz.2022.100018","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Stomatal O<sub>3</sub> flux accumulated over the growing season (or phytotoxic ozone dose above a y threshold of uptake, PODy) is nowadays considered as the best biologically based metric to assess O<sub>3</sub> injury to vegetation and establishing critical levels (CLs). So far, CLs have used biomass losses as forest-health indicator in experimental research. Ozone-induced biomass losses of adult forests, however, are difficult to assess. We stress a need to reconcile present CLs and dose-response functions to estimate O<sub>3</sub>-induced biomass losses. In fact, a clear discrepancy emerges when comparing CL exceedances calculated from WRF-Chem results and biomass losses estimated based on the presently available dose-response functions for different forest types. We synthesize recent evidence that visible foliar O<sub>3</sub> injury (VFI) recorded annually in large-scale forest surveys may be used as forest-health indicator and coupled with active O<sub>3</sub> monitoring in setting epidemiology-based CLs for forest protection. Bridging experimental and monitoring research is needed for validation and parameterization of field results and models, with the O<sub>3</sub> free-air controlled exposure (FACE) facilities as a reliable experimental tool. In fact, VFI is well correlated to O<sub>3</sub>-induced biomass loss at O<sub>3</sub> FACE experiments, and POD1 and O<sub>3</sub> tolerance (when characterized as leaf mass per area (LMA) directly affect VFI under field conditions. POD1 shows a much stronger causality than the O<sub>3</sub> exposure index AOT40 in affecting VFI. Accurate calculation of PODy at field sites is now possible, thanks to recent technological advances that support low-cost and reliable monitoring of PODy at forest sites and thus ensure long-term sustainability of such laborious monitoring. We summarise evidence that active O<sub>3</sub> monitoring is a cost-effective approach for estimating PODy and its economic effects on forests, as the initial investment is compensated in few years by less travels to the field sites than passive O<sub>3</sub> monitoring. These results respond to raising legislative interest into PODy, and support long-term sustainability of PODy monitoring at forest sites.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":101199,"journal":{"name":"Sustainable Horizons","volume":"2 ","pages":"Article 100018"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S277273782200013X/pdfft?md5=50fdca1a423e36e691674b5729e7edb3&pid=1-s2.0-S277273782200013X-main.pdf","citationCount":"9","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Towards long-term sustainability of stomatal ozone flux monitoring at forest sites\",\"authors\":\"Elena Paoletti ,&nbsp;Pierre Sicard ,&nbsp;Yasutomo Hoshika ,&nbsp;Silvano Fares ,&nbsp;Ovidiu Badea ,&nbsp;Diana Pitar ,&nbsp;Ionel Popa ,&nbsp;Alessandro Anav ,&nbsp;Barbara Baesso Moura ,&nbsp;Alessandra De Marco\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.horiz.2022.100018\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Stomatal O<sub>3</sub> flux accumulated over the growing season (or phytotoxic ozone dose above a y threshold of uptake, PODy) is nowadays considered as the best biologically based metric to assess O<sub>3</sub> injury to vegetation and establishing critical levels (CLs). So far, CLs have used biomass losses as forest-health indicator in experimental research. Ozone-induced biomass losses of adult forests, however, are difficult to assess. We stress a need to reconcile present CLs and dose-response functions to estimate O<sub>3</sub>-induced biomass losses. In fact, a clear discrepancy emerges when comparing CL exceedances calculated from WRF-Chem results and biomass losses estimated based on the presently available dose-response functions for different forest types. We synthesize recent evidence that visible foliar O<sub>3</sub> injury (VFI) recorded annually in large-scale forest surveys may be used as forest-health indicator and coupled with active O<sub>3</sub> monitoring in setting epidemiology-based CLs for forest protection. Bridging experimental and monitoring research is needed for validation and parameterization of field results and models, with the O<sub>3</sub> free-air controlled exposure (FACE) facilities as a reliable experimental tool. In fact, VFI is well correlated to O<sub>3</sub>-induced biomass loss at O<sub>3</sub> FACE experiments, and POD1 and O<sub>3</sub> tolerance (when characterized as leaf mass per area (LMA) directly affect VFI under field conditions. POD1 shows a much stronger causality than the O<sub>3</sub> exposure index AOT40 in affecting VFI. Accurate calculation of PODy at field sites is now possible, thanks to recent technological advances that support low-cost and reliable monitoring of PODy at forest sites and thus ensure long-term sustainability of such laborious monitoring. We summarise evidence that active O<sub>3</sub> monitoring is a cost-effective approach for estimating PODy and its economic effects on forests, as the initial investment is compensated in few years by less travels to the field sites than passive O<sub>3</sub> monitoring. These results respond to raising legislative interest into PODy, and support long-term sustainability of PODy monitoring at forest sites.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":101199,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Sustainable Horizons\",\"volume\":\"2 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100018\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S277273782200013X/pdfft?md5=50fdca1a423e36e691674b5729e7edb3&pid=1-s2.0-S277273782200013X-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"9\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Sustainable Horizons\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S277273782200013X\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sustainable Horizons","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S277273782200013X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 9

摘要

生长季节累积的气孔臭氧通量(或超过y吸收阈值的植物毒性臭氧剂量,PODy)目前被认为是评估臭氧对植被伤害和建立临界水平(CLs)的最佳生物学指标。到目前为止,CLs在实验研究中已将生物量损失作为森林健康指标。然而,臭氧引起的成林生物量损失难以评估。我们强调需要调和目前的CLs和剂量响应函数来估计臭氧引起的生物量损失。事实上,在比较根据WRF-Chem结果计算出的CL超标量和根据目前可获得的不同森林类型的剂量响应函数估计的生物量损失时,出现了明显的差异。我们综合了近年来的证据,认为在大规模森林调查中每年记录的可见叶面O3损伤(VFI)可以作为森林健康指标,并与主动O3监测相结合,以建立基于流行病学的森林保护CLs。为了验证和参数化现场结果和模型,需要进行连接实验和监测研究,而O3自由空气控制暴露(FACE)设施是一个可靠的实验工具。事实上,在O3 FACE实验中,VFI与O3诱导的生物量损失有很好的相关性,而在田间条件下,POD1和O3耐受性(以叶面积质量(LMA)表征)直接影响VFI。POD1对VFI的影响比O3暴露指数AOT40的因果关系强得多。由于最近的技术进步支持对森林场址的PODy进行低成本和可靠的监测,从而确保这种艰苦监测的长期可持续性,现在可以精确计算野外场址的PODy。我们总结了一些证据,表明主动臭氧监测是估算PODy及其对森林的经济影响的一种具有成本效益的方法,因为与被动臭氧监测相比,最初的投资在几年内会因较少的实地考察而得到补偿。这些结果对提高立法机构对PODy的兴趣作出了回应,并支持在森林地点进行PODy监测的长期可持续性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Towards long-term sustainability of stomatal ozone flux monitoring at forest sites

Towards long-term sustainability of stomatal ozone flux monitoring at forest sites

Stomatal O3 flux accumulated over the growing season (or phytotoxic ozone dose above a y threshold of uptake, PODy) is nowadays considered as the best biologically based metric to assess O3 injury to vegetation and establishing critical levels (CLs). So far, CLs have used biomass losses as forest-health indicator in experimental research. Ozone-induced biomass losses of adult forests, however, are difficult to assess. We stress a need to reconcile present CLs and dose-response functions to estimate O3-induced biomass losses. In fact, a clear discrepancy emerges when comparing CL exceedances calculated from WRF-Chem results and biomass losses estimated based on the presently available dose-response functions for different forest types. We synthesize recent evidence that visible foliar O3 injury (VFI) recorded annually in large-scale forest surveys may be used as forest-health indicator and coupled with active O3 monitoring in setting epidemiology-based CLs for forest protection. Bridging experimental and monitoring research is needed for validation and parameterization of field results and models, with the O3 free-air controlled exposure (FACE) facilities as a reliable experimental tool. In fact, VFI is well correlated to O3-induced biomass loss at O3 FACE experiments, and POD1 and O3 tolerance (when characterized as leaf mass per area (LMA) directly affect VFI under field conditions. POD1 shows a much stronger causality than the O3 exposure index AOT40 in affecting VFI. Accurate calculation of PODy at field sites is now possible, thanks to recent technological advances that support low-cost and reliable monitoring of PODy at forest sites and thus ensure long-term sustainability of such laborious monitoring. We summarise evidence that active O3 monitoring is a cost-effective approach for estimating PODy and its economic effects on forests, as the initial investment is compensated in few years by less travels to the field sites than passive O3 monitoring. These results respond to raising legislative interest into PODy, and support long-term sustainability of PODy monitoring at forest sites.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信