H. Momeni, A. Kerami, L. Mirshekari, Z. Shahsavari, Z. Shokhmgar, A. Sanagoo, A. Salehi
{"title":"程序技能组合与直接观察(DOPS)模式对护生批判性思维倾向的影响","authors":"H. Momeni, A. Kerami, L. Mirshekari, Z. Shahsavari, Z. Shokhmgar, A. Sanagoo, A. Salehi","doi":"10.52547/rme.13.2.47","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"©2021 Guilan University of Medical Sciences ABSTACT Introduction: Given the importance of nursing education and evaluation and the need to make correct decisions in critical situations by students also to promote critical thinking in nursing students, researcher decided to assess efficacy of clinical evaluation by two methods of direct observation of procedural skills and portfolio on critical thinking of students. Methods: in this interventional study 32 Students of the 5 th semester of the Bachelor of Nursing, Khomein College of Nursing which divided into two groups with pretest & posttest participated in 2013. At the beginning, critical thinking disposition questionnaire ( CTDI) was completed by students. Then, Class was divided into two groups randomly. In each group, one of the evaluation methods containing Portfolio and Direct Observation of Procedural Skills (DOPS) was executed. At last critical thinking disposition questionnaire again was completed and results were evaluated. Data were analyzed by descriptive statistics and independent ttest through SPSS. Results: The results showed that the total score of tendency to critical thinking in the portfolio group was as follow: before the evaluation method (240.97±21.25) and after the evaluation method (266.50±21/32),also, in the direct observation skill group before evaluation (242/17±20/85) and after evaluation was (248/17±18/24). There are","PeriodicalId":75518,"journal":{"name":"Annual Conference on Research in Medical Education. Conference on Research in Medical Education","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparing the Efficacy of Portfolio and Direct Observation of Procedural Skills (DOPS) Model, on Nursing Students Disposition Toward Critical Thinking\",\"authors\":\"H. Momeni, A. Kerami, L. Mirshekari, Z. Shahsavari, Z. Shokhmgar, A. Sanagoo, A. Salehi\",\"doi\":\"10.52547/rme.13.2.47\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"©2021 Guilan University of Medical Sciences ABSTACT Introduction: Given the importance of nursing education and evaluation and the need to make correct decisions in critical situations by students also to promote critical thinking in nursing students, researcher decided to assess efficacy of clinical evaluation by two methods of direct observation of procedural skills and portfolio on critical thinking of students. Methods: in this interventional study 32 Students of the 5 th semester of the Bachelor of Nursing, Khomein College of Nursing which divided into two groups with pretest & posttest participated in 2013. At the beginning, critical thinking disposition questionnaire ( CTDI) was completed by students. Then, Class was divided into two groups randomly. In each group, one of the evaluation methods containing Portfolio and Direct Observation of Procedural Skills (DOPS) was executed. At last critical thinking disposition questionnaire again was completed and results were evaluated. Data were analyzed by descriptive statistics and independent ttest through SPSS. Results: The results showed that the total score of tendency to critical thinking in the portfolio group was as follow: before the evaluation method (240.97±21.25) and after the evaluation method (266.50±21/32),also, in the direct observation skill group before evaluation (242/17±20/85) and after evaluation was (248/17±18/24). There are\",\"PeriodicalId\":75518,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Annual Conference on Research in Medical Education. Conference on Research in Medical Education\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Annual Conference on Research in Medical Education. Conference on Research in Medical Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.52547/rme.13.2.47\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annual Conference on Research in Medical Education. Conference on Research in Medical Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.52547/rme.13.2.47","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Comparing the Efficacy of Portfolio and Direct Observation of Procedural Skills (DOPS) Model, on Nursing Students Disposition Toward Critical Thinking
©2021 Guilan University of Medical Sciences ABSTACT Introduction: Given the importance of nursing education and evaluation and the need to make correct decisions in critical situations by students also to promote critical thinking in nursing students, researcher decided to assess efficacy of clinical evaluation by two methods of direct observation of procedural skills and portfolio on critical thinking of students. Methods: in this interventional study 32 Students of the 5 th semester of the Bachelor of Nursing, Khomein College of Nursing which divided into two groups with pretest & posttest participated in 2013. At the beginning, critical thinking disposition questionnaire ( CTDI) was completed by students. Then, Class was divided into two groups randomly. In each group, one of the evaluation methods containing Portfolio and Direct Observation of Procedural Skills (DOPS) was executed. At last critical thinking disposition questionnaire again was completed and results were evaluated. Data were analyzed by descriptive statistics and independent ttest through SPSS. Results: The results showed that the total score of tendency to critical thinking in the portfolio group was as follow: before the evaluation method (240.97±21.25) and after the evaluation method (266.50±21/32),also, in the direct observation skill group before evaluation (242/17±20/85) and after evaluation was (248/17±18/24). There are