必不可少却被排除在外：COVID-19 和巴西家庭佣工体面工作的不足

IF 2.8 4区管理学 Q1 ECONOMICS

International Labour Review Pub Date : 2023-06-29 DOI:10.1111/ilr.12402

Louisa ACCIARI, Chirlene DOS SANTOS BRITO, Cleide PEREIRA PINTO

{"title":"必不可少却被排除在外：COVID-19 和巴西家庭佣工体面工作的不足","authors":"Louisa ACCIARI, Chirlene DOS SANTOS BRITO, Cleide PEREIRA PINTO","doi":"10.1111/ilr.12402","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n <p>This article presents data from a survey conducted with the National Federation of Domestic Workers of Brazil on the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on domestic workers, also considering emergency policies and the Federation's main actions in the first year of the crisis. Focusing on employment and income, occupational health and safety, and violations of rights, it shows the extreme polarization between those who lost their livelihoods and those obliged to continue working at the expense of their health and basic human rights. Although the circumstances were exceptional, the authors argue that this situation was made possible by pre-existing conditions of legal exclusion and precarity.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":47216,"journal":{"name":"International Labour Review","volume":"163 1","pages":"1-23"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/ilr.12402","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Essential yet excluded: COVID-19 and the decent work deficit among domestic workers in Brazil\",\"authors\":\"Louisa ACCIARI, Chirlene DOS SANTOS BRITO, Cleide PEREIRA PINTO\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/ilr.12402\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n <p>This article presents data from a survey conducted with the National Federation of Domestic Workers of Brazil on the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on domestic workers, also considering emergency policies and the Federation's main actions in the first year of the crisis. Focusing on employment and income, occupational health and safety, and violations of rights, it shows the extreme polarization between those who lost their livelihoods and those obliged to continue working at the expense of their health and basic human rights. Although the circumstances were exceptional, the authors argue that this situation was made possible by pre-existing conditions of legal exclusion and precarity.</p>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47216,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Labour Review\",\"volume\":\"163 1\",\"pages\":\"1-23\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-06-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/ilr.12402\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Labour Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"91\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ilr.12402\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"管理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ECONOMICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Labour Review","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ilr.12402","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

本文介绍了与巴西全国家政工人联合会合作开展的一项调查所获得的数据，该调查涉及 COVID-19 大流行病对家政工人的影响，同时还考虑了危机第一年的应急政策和联合会的主要行动。报告以就业和收入、职业健康和安全以及侵权行为为重点，显示了失去生计者与不得不牺牲健康和基本人权继续工作者之间的极端两极分化。虽然情况特殊，但作者认为，这种情况是由于之前存在的法律排斥和不稳定性造成的。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

Essential yet excluded: COVID-19 and the decent work deficit among domestic workers in Brazil

This article presents data from a survey conducted with the National Federation of Domestic Workers of Brazil on the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on domestic workers, also considering emergency policies and the Federation's main actions in the first year of the crisis. Focusing on employment and income, occupational health and safety, and violations of rights, it shows the extreme polarization between those who lost their livelihoods and those obliged to continue working at the expense of their health and basic human rights. Although the circumstances were exceptional, the authors argue that this situation was made possible by pre-existing conditions of legal exclusion and precarity.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

International Labour Review Multiple-

CiteScore

4.30

自引率

20.00%

发文量

期刊介绍： The International Labour Review is the world"s leading multidisciplinary journal of labour market institutions and economics. Its aim is to advance academic research and inform policy debate and decision-making in these fields by bringing together the original thinking of lawyers, economists, sociologists, political scientists and industrial relations specialists on a broad range of labour market policy and social protection concerns. The International Labour Review also features concise reports on current developments considered to be of particular interest to those working in these fields and reviews of recent major publications. It is committed to an editorial policy that combines accessibility with rigorous, insightful analysis and the highest scholarly standards.