{"title":"短期与长期心脏康复计划后的风险因素管理","authors":"P. Boulay , D. Prud'homme","doi":"10.1054/chec.2001.0127","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The purpose of this study was to determine the efficacy of a short-term cardiac rehabilitation program (ST-CRP) and a long-term cardiac rehabilitation program (LT-CRP) in patients who had an acute myocardial infarction regarding coronary artery disease (CAD) risk factor management 1 year post-event. For this purpose, 74 patients participated in either a short-term (3 months) cardiac rehabilitation program (ST-CRP; <em>n</em> = 37) or a long-term (12 months) cardiac rehabilitation program (LT-CRP; <em>n</em> = 37). Both interventions were effective for management of CAD risk factors by improving lipoprotein-lipid profile, exercise capacity and smoking cessation. However, no significant reduction was observed in body weight and body fat distribution index at 1 year post-event in both intervention groups. Furthermore, improvements in CAD risk factors, such as lipoprotein-lipid profile and smoking habits were significantly greater in the LT-CRP group. Also, significantly more patients attained the recommended target values of ≤2.5 mmol/L for plasma low-density lipoprotein levels (46% vs 22%; <em>P</em> < 0.01) and a ratio of ≤4 for total plasma cholesterol/high density lipoprotein (46% vs 19%; <em>P</em> < 0.01) of the Canadian Working group on hypercholesterolemia. Both intervention program produced beneficial effects regarding CAD risk factor management, nonetheless, long-term participation in a cardiac rehabilitation program had a greater impact on the CAD risk factor profile of patients at 1 year post-event.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100334,"journal":{"name":"Coronary Health Care","volume":"5 3","pages":"Pages 133-140"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2001-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1054/chec.2001.0127","citationCount":"16","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Risk factor management after short-term versus long-term cardiac rehabilitation program\",\"authors\":\"P. Boulay , D. Prud'homme\",\"doi\":\"10.1054/chec.2001.0127\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>The purpose of this study was to determine the efficacy of a short-term cardiac rehabilitation program (ST-CRP) and a long-term cardiac rehabilitation program (LT-CRP) in patients who had an acute myocardial infarction regarding coronary artery disease (CAD) risk factor management 1 year post-event. For this purpose, 74 patients participated in either a short-term (3 months) cardiac rehabilitation program (ST-CRP; <em>n</em> = 37) or a long-term (12 months) cardiac rehabilitation program (LT-CRP; <em>n</em> = 37). Both interventions were effective for management of CAD risk factors by improving lipoprotein-lipid profile, exercise capacity and smoking cessation. However, no significant reduction was observed in body weight and body fat distribution index at 1 year post-event in both intervention groups. Furthermore, improvements in CAD risk factors, such as lipoprotein-lipid profile and smoking habits were significantly greater in the LT-CRP group. Also, significantly more patients attained the recommended target values of ≤2.5 mmol/L for plasma low-density lipoprotein levels (46% vs 22%; <em>P</em> < 0.01) and a ratio of ≤4 for total plasma cholesterol/high density lipoprotein (46% vs 19%; <em>P</em> < 0.01) of the Canadian Working group on hypercholesterolemia. Both intervention program produced beneficial effects regarding CAD risk factor management, nonetheless, long-term participation in a cardiac rehabilitation program had a greater impact on the CAD risk factor profile of patients at 1 year post-event.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":100334,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Coronary Health Care\",\"volume\":\"5 3\",\"pages\":\"Pages 133-140\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2001-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1054/chec.2001.0127\",\"citationCount\":\"16\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Coronary Health Care\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1362326501901270\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Coronary Health Care","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1362326501901270","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 16
摘要
本研究的目的是确定短期心脏康复计划(ST-CRP)和长期心脏康复计划(LT-CRP)对急性心肌梗死患者在冠状动脉疾病(CAD)危险因素管理后1年的疗效。为此,74名患者参加了短期(3个月)心脏康复计划(ST-CRP;n = 37)或长期(12个月)心脏康复计划(LT-CRP;N = 37)。通过改善脂蛋白-脂质谱、运动能力和戒烟,这两种干预措施对冠心病危险因素的管理都是有效的。然而,在事件发生后1年,两个干预组的体重和体脂分布指数均未见明显下降。此外,冠心病危险因素的改善,如脂蛋白-脂质谱和吸烟习惯,在LT-CRP组显著更大。此外,更多的患者达到了血浆低密度脂蛋白水平≤2.5 mmol/L的推荐目标值(46% vs 22%;P & lt;0.01),血浆总胆固醇/高密度脂蛋白比值≤4 (46% vs 19%;P & lt;0.01)的加拿大高胆固醇血症工作组。两种干预方案在冠心病危险因素管理方面都产生了有益的影响,然而,长期参与心脏康复方案对患者在事件发生后1年的冠心病危险因素概况有更大的影响。
Risk factor management after short-term versus long-term cardiac rehabilitation program
The purpose of this study was to determine the efficacy of a short-term cardiac rehabilitation program (ST-CRP) and a long-term cardiac rehabilitation program (LT-CRP) in patients who had an acute myocardial infarction regarding coronary artery disease (CAD) risk factor management 1 year post-event. For this purpose, 74 patients participated in either a short-term (3 months) cardiac rehabilitation program (ST-CRP; n = 37) or a long-term (12 months) cardiac rehabilitation program (LT-CRP; n = 37). Both interventions were effective for management of CAD risk factors by improving lipoprotein-lipid profile, exercise capacity and smoking cessation. However, no significant reduction was observed in body weight and body fat distribution index at 1 year post-event in both intervention groups. Furthermore, improvements in CAD risk factors, such as lipoprotein-lipid profile and smoking habits were significantly greater in the LT-CRP group. Also, significantly more patients attained the recommended target values of ≤2.5 mmol/L for plasma low-density lipoprotein levels (46% vs 22%; P < 0.01) and a ratio of ≤4 for total plasma cholesterol/high density lipoprotein (46% vs 19%; P < 0.01) of the Canadian Working group on hypercholesterolemia. Both intervention program produced beneficial effects regarding CAD risk factor management, nonetheless, long-term participation in a cardiac rehabilitation program had a greater impact on the CAD risk factor profile of patients at 1 year post-event.