告别里根:不需要新的开始

S. Serfaty
{"title":"告别里根:不需要新的开始","authors":"S. Serfaty","doi":"10.1353/SAIS.1989.0041","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"«very new president comes to office determined to provide the nation with a foreign policy that he can legitimately call his own. This temptation has been all the more irresistible since 1948, as most election years have coincided with international crises that left the country with a sense of danger or a taste of failure: Soviet interventions in Czechoslovakia in March 1948 and Hungary in October 1956, the aborted Paris summit in May 1960, and the Gulf of Tonkin incident in September 1964; wars in Korea and Vietnam in 1952 and 1972, the Tet Offensive in January 1968, and hostilities in Afghanistan and Iran in 1980. Accordingly, every four to eight years, presidential campaigns bring to the foreign policy agenda promises of \"new beginnings\" designed to escape present dangers or reverse past failures. In 1980 Ronald Reagan's call for a new beginning readily captured the attention (and votes) of the nation. His eloquent evocation of America's economic recovery and political unity — at no explicit, or explicitly defined, cost — served to resurrect the once traditionally held images of national prosperity and confidence. His vigorous campaign against detente and arms control — both denounced as fatally flawed—helped display an assertiveness and a pride that the country had apparently found lacking in prior years. These, remember, were to be the years of renewal. Reagan's immoderate optimism about U.S. potential and values, and his blunt pessimism about Soviet realities and ideology, aimed at ending a","PeriodicalId":85482,"journal":{"name":"SAIS review (Paul H. Nitze School of Advanced International Studies)","volume":"7 1","pages":"21 - 34"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-07-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Farewell to Reagan: New Beginnings Are Not Needed\",\"authors\":\"S. Serfaty\",\"doi\":\"10.1353/SAIS.1989.0041\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"«very new president comes to office determined to provide the nation with a foreign policy that he can legitimately call his own. This temptation has been all the more irresistible since 1948, as most election years have coincided with international crises that left the country with a sense of danger or a taste of failure: Soviet interventions in Czechoslovakia in March 1948 and Hungary in October 1956, the aborted Paris summit in May 1960, and the Gulf of Tonkin incident in September 1964; wars in Korea and Vietnam in 1952 and 1972, the Tet Offensive in January 1968, and hostilities in Afghanistan and Iran in 1980. Accordingly, every four to eight years, presidential campaigns bring to the foreign policy agenda promises of \\\"new beginnings\\\" designed to escape present dangers or reverse past failures. In 1980 Ronald Reagan's call for a new beginning readily captured the attention (and votes) of the nation. His eloquent evocation of America's economic recovery and political unity — at no explicit, or explicitly defined, cost — served to resurrect the once traditionally held images of national prosperity and confidence. His vigorous campaign against detente and arms control — both denounced as fatally flawed—helped display an assertiveness and a pride that the country had apparently found lacking in prior years. These, remember, were to be the years of renewal. Reagan's immoderate optimism about U.S. potential and values, and his blunt pessimism about Soviet realities and ideology, aimed at ending a\",\"PeriodicalId\":85482,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"SAIS review (Paul H. Nitze School of Advanced International Studies)\",\"volume\":\"7 1\",\"pages\":\"21 - 34\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2012-07-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"SAIS review (Paul H. Nitze School of Advanced International Studies)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1353/SAIS.1989.0041\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"SAIS review (Paul H. Nitze School of Advanced International Studies)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/SAIS.1989.0041","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

“每一位新总统上任时都决心为国家提供一种他可以合法地称之为自己的外交政策。自1948年以来,这种诱惑变得更加难以抗拒,因为大多数选举年都恰逢国际危机,让这个国家感到危险或失败:1948年3月苏联对捷克斯洛伐克的干预,1956年10月对匈牙利的干预,1960年5月对巴黎峰会的流产,1964年9月的东京湾事件;1952年和1972年的朝鲜战争和越南战争,1968年1月的春节攻势,1980年在阿富汗和伊朗的敌对行动。因此,每隔4到8年,总统竞选就会在外交政策议程上提出旨在摆脱当前危险或扭转过去失败的“新开端”承诺。1980年,罗纳德•里根(Ronald Reagan)呼吁重新开始的言论迅速吸引了全国的注意力(和选票)。他对美国经济复苏和政治团结的雄辩唤起——没有任何明确的或明确定义的代价——有助于重振一度被视为国家繁荣和自信的传统形象。他大力反对缓和和军备控制——两者都被谴责为存在致命缺陷——有助于展示该国在前几年明显缺乏的自信和自豪感。记住,这是复兴的岁月。里根对美国潜力和价值观的过度乐观,以及对苏联现实和意识形态的直率悲观,旨在结束一场战争
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Farewell to Reagan: New Beginnings Are Not Needed
«very new president comes to office determined to provide the nation with a foreign policy that he can legitimately call his own. This temptation has been all the more irresistible since 1948, as most election years have coincided with international crises that left the country with a sense of danger or a taste of failure: Soviet interventions in Czechoslovakia in March 1948 and Hungary in October 1956, the aborted Paris summit in May 1960, and the Gulf of Tonkin incident in September 1964; wars in Korea and Vietnam in 1952 and 1972, the Tet Offensive in January 1968, and hostilities in Afghanistan and Iran in 1980. Accordingly, every four to eight years, presidential campaigns bring to the foreign policy agenda promises of "new beginnings" designed to escape present dangers or reverse past failures. In 1980 Ronald Reagan's call for a new beginning readily captured the attention (and votes) of the nation. His eloquent evocation of America's economic recovery and political unity — at no explicit, or explicitly defined, cost — served to resurrect the once traditionally held images of national prosperity and confidence. His vigorous campaign against detente and arms control — both denounced as fatally flawed—helped display an assertiveness and a pride that the country had apparently found lacking in prior years. These, remember, were to be the years of renewal. Reagan's immoderate optimism about U.S. potential and values, and his blunt pessimism about Soviet realities and ideology, aimed at ending a
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信