改进的半椭圆近端等速表面积法用于临床应用:多普勒超声心动图中二尖瓣反流更准确的定量。

H. Fujii, S. Kibira, C. Izumi, T. Saito, A. Ryabikov, M. Miura
{"title":"改进的半椭圆近端等速表面积法用于临床应用:多普勒超声心动图中二尖瓣反流更准确的定量。","authors":"H. Fujii, S. Kibira, C. Izumi, T. Saito, A. Ryabikov, M. Miura","doi":"10.1253/JCJ.65.820","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The proximal isovelocity surface area (PISA) method is one of the various methods used for quantitatively estimating mitral regurgitation. The PISA shape is hemielliptic rather than hemispheric on a slit-like orifice, and the hemielliptic method is more accurate than the hemispheric method for in vitro studies. Nevertheless, the hemispheric method is used clinically because of its simplicity, whereas the hemielliptic method is difficult to approach from 3 orthogonal directions. The present study tries to establish a modified hemielliptic method for use in clinical applications. A closed-circuit, constant flow system was designed to simulate PISA, and various types of slit-like orifices were selected. Three orthogonal PISA radii were measured and flow rates were calculated using the original hemielliptic formula from the 3 orthogonal radii. Flow rates were also calculated indirectly using a linear regression formula, and PISA radii from a bird's eye approach and lateral approaches (modified hemielliptic method) were compared. Flow rates that were determined using the original hemielliptic method correlated significantly with actual flow rates (r = 0.92, p < 0.0001; y = 1.1x - 13; SEE = 13.63 ml/s). Similarly, flow rates calculated using the modified hemielliptic method correlated significantly with actual flow rates (r = 0.90, p < 0.001; y = 0.94x - 0.78; SEE = 14.13 ml/s). The study's results imply that the modified hemielliptic method can be used to accurately quantify mitral regurgitation and could be applied for clinical examinations.","PeriodicalId":14544,"journal":{"name":"Japanese circulation journal","volume":"203 1","pages":"820-6"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2001-08-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Hemielliptic proximal isovelocity surface area method modified for clinical application: more accurate quantification of mitral regurgitation in Doppler echocardiography.\",\"authors\":\"H. Fujii, S. Kibira, C. Izumi, T. Saito, A. Ryabikov, M. Miura\",\"doi\":\"10.1253/JCJ.65.820\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The proximal isovelocity surface area (PISA) method is one of the various methods used for quantitatively estimating mitral regurgitation. The PISA shape is hemielliptic rather than hemispheric on a slit-like orifice, and the hemielliptic method is more accurate than the hemispheric method for in vitro studies. Nevertheless, the hemispheric method is used clinically because of its simplicity, whereas the hemielliptic method is difficult to approach from 3 orthogonal directions. The present study tries to establish a modified hemielliptic method for use in clinical applications. A closed-circuit, constant flow system was designed to simulate PISA, and various types of slit-like orifices were selected. Three orthogonal PISA radii were measured and flow rates were calculated using the original hemielliptic formula from the 3 orthogonal radii. Flow rates were also calculated indirectly using a linear regression formula, and PISA radii from a bird's eye approach and lateral approaches (modified hemielliptic method) were compared. Flow rates that were determined using the original hemielliptic method correlated significantly with actual flow rates (r = 0.92, p < 0.0001; y = 1.1x - 13; SEE = 13.63 ml/s). Similarly, flow rates calculated using the modified hemielliptic method correlated significantly with actual flow rates (r = 0.90, p < 0.001; y = 0.94x - 0.78; SEE = 14.13 ml/s). The study's results imply that the modified hemielliptic method can be used to accurately quantify mitral regurgitation and could be applied for clinical examinations.\",\"PeriodicalId\":14544,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Japanese circulation journal\",\"volume\":\"203 1\",\"pages\":\"820-6\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2001-08-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Japanese circulation journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1253/JCJ.65.820\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Japanese circulation journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1253/JCJ.65.820","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

摘要

近端等速表面积(PISA)法是定量估计二尖瓣返流的多种方法之一。PISA形状是半椭圆形的,而不是半球形的,半椭圆形的方法比半球形的方法在体外研究中更准确。然而,半球法因其简单而在临床上使用,而半椭圆法难以从3个正交方向接近。本研究试图建立一种用于临床应用的改良半椭圆法。设计了一个闭环、恒流系统来模拟PISA,并选择了各种类型的狭缝状孔口。测量了三个正交的PISA半径,并利用原始的半椭圆公式计算了3个正交半径的流量。流速也使用线性回归公式间接计算,并比较了鸟眼入路和侧向入路(改进的半椭圆法)的PISA半径。采用原始半椭圆法测定的流量与实际流量显著相关(r = 0.92, p < 0.0001;Y = 1.1x - 13;SEE = 13.63 ml/s)。同样,使用改进的半椭圆法计算的流量与实际流量显著相关(r = 0.90, p < 0.001;Y = 0.94x - 0.78;SEE = 14.13 ml/s)。本研究结果提示改进的半椭圆法可准确定量二尖瓣反流,可应用于临床检查。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Hemielliptic proximal isovelocity surface area method modified for clinical application: more accurate quantification of mitral regurgitation in Doppler echocardiography.
The proximal isovelocity surface area (PISA) method is one of the various methods used for quantitatively estimating mitral regurgitation. The PISA shape is hemielliptic rather than hemispheric on a slit-like orifice, and the hemielliptic method is more accurate than the hemispheric method for in vitro studies. Nevertheless, the hemispheric method is used clinically because of its simplicity, whereas the hemielliptic method is difficult to approach from 3 orthogonal directions. The present study tries to establish a modified hemielliptic method for use in clinical applications. A closed-circuit, constant flow system was designed to simulate PISA, and various types of slit-like orifices were selected. Three orthogonal PISA radii were measured and flow rates were calculated using the original hemielliptic formula from the 3 orthogonal radii. Flow rates were also calculated indirectly using a linear regression formula, and PISA radii from a bird's eye approach and lateral approaches (modified hemielliptic method) were compared. Flow rates that were determined using the original hemielliptic method correlated significantly with actual flow rates (r = 0.92, p < 0.0001; y = 1.1x - 13; SEE = 13.63 ml/s). Similarly, flow rates calculated using the modified hemielliptic method correlated significantly with actual flow rates (r = 0.90, p < 0.001; y = 0.94x - 0.78; SEE = 14.13 ml/s). The study's results imply that the modified hemielliptic method can be used to accurately quantify mitral regurgitation and could be applied for clinical examinations.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信