选择性系统评价:计划医疗环境对治疗、健康和幸福的影响

Karen L. Hoblet
{"title":"选择性系统评价:计划医疗环境对治疗、健康和幸福的影响","authors":"Karen L. Hoblet","doi":"10.33552/OJCAM.2020.05.000605","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Aim: The objective of this study was to review research to determine if evidence existed to support the assertion that planned healthcare environments utilizing evidence-based design improve healing, health and well-being. Background: Millions of people are treated in hospitals in the United States annually [1]. These facilities are environments where people interact with healthcare experts to achieve healing, health, and wellbeing. Purpose: The literature was investigated to determine if evidence-based design, the planned design of healthcare facilities, impacts human healing, health, and wellbeing. Methods: A systematic review of selected literature was planned and attempted utilizing PRISMA 27-item check list and four-phase flow diagram. Databases included the Cumulative Index of Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL), Psych INFO produced by the American Psychological Association, and PubMed search engine of the MEDLINE database of references and abstracts from the United States National Library of Medicine at the National Institutes of Health. This exploration included research and literature regarding the design and development of planned healthcare environments that promote healing, health and wellbeing and the consideration of theory that supports the significance of environment in human development. Results: No evidence was found that support the assertion that planned healthcare environments utilizing evidence-based design improve healing, health and well-being. Limited research evidence prohibited organization and reporting using PRISMA. Conclusion: Research should be completed utilizing a design that helps determine if there is a relationship between planned healthcare environments and healing, health, and well-being.","PeriodicalId":19661,"journal":{"name":"Online Journal of Complementary & Alternative Medicine","volume":"71 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-08-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Selective Systematic Review: Planned Healthcare Environments Impact on Healing, Health and Well-being\",\"authors\":\"Karen L. Hoblet\",\"doi\":\"10.33552/OJCAM.2020.05.000605\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Aim: The objective of this study was to review research to determine if evidence existed to support the assertion that planned healthcare environments utilizing evidence-based design improve healing, health and well-being. Background: Millions of people are treated in hospitals in the United States annually [1]. These facilities are environments where people interact with healthcare experts to achieve healing, health, and wellbeing. Purpose: The literature was investigated to determine if evidence-based design, the planned design of healthcare facilities, impacts human healing, health, and wellbeing. Methods: A systematic review of selected literature was planned and attempted utilizing PRISMA 27-item check list and four-phase flow diagram. Databases included the Cumulative Index of Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL), Psych INFO produced by the American Psychological Association, and PubMed search engine of the MEDLINE database of references and abstracts from the United States National Library of Medicine at the National Institutes of Health. This exploration included research and literature regarding the design and development of planned healthcare environments that promote healing, health and wellbeing and the consideration of theory that supports the significance of environment in human development. Results: No evidence was found that support the assertion that planned healthcare environments utilizing evidence-based design improve healing, health and well-being. Limited research evidence prohibited organization and reporting using PRISMA. Conclusion: Research should be completed utilizing a design that helps determine if there is a relationship between planned healthcare environments and healing, health, and well-being.\",\"PeriodicalId\":19661,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Online Journal of Complementary & Alternative Medicine\",\"volume\":\"71 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-08-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Online Journal of Complementary & Alternative Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.33552/OJCAM.2020.05.000605\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Online Journal of Complementary & Alternative Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33552/OJCAM.2020.05.000605","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:本研究的目的是回顾研究,以确定是否有证据支持使用循证设计的计划医疗保健环境可改善治疗、健康和福祉的主张。背景:在美国,每年有数百万人在医院接受治疗。这些设施是人们与医疗保健专家互动以实现治疗、健康和幸福的环境。目的:对文献进行调查,以确定循证设计,即医疗设施的规划设计,是否会影响人类的康复、健康和福祉。方法:采用PRISMA 27项检查表和四阶段流程图对所选文献进行系统综述。数据库包括护理和相关健康文献累积索引(CINAHL)、美国心理学协会制作的Psych INFO,以及美国国立卫生研究院美国国家医学图书馆MEDLINE参考文献和摘要数据库的PubMed搜索引擎。这一探索包括关于计划医疗环境的设计和开发的研究和文献,这些环境促进了康复、健康和福祉,并考虑了支持环境在人类发展中的重要性的理论。结果:没有发现证据支持使用循证设计的计划医疗环境可改善治疗、健康和福祉的主张。有限的研究证据禁止使用PRISMA组织和报告。结论:研究应该利用一种有助于确定计划的医疗保健环境与治疗、健康和幸福之间是否存在关系的设计来完成。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Selective Systematic Review: Planned Healthcare Environments Impact on Healing, Health and Well-being
Aim: The objective of this study was to review research to determine if evidence existed to support the assertion that planned healthcare environments utilizing evidence-based design improve healing, health and well-being. Background: Millions of people are treated in hospitals in the United States annually [1]. These facilities are environments where people interact with healthcare experts to achieve healing, health, and wellbeing. Purpose: The literature was investigated to determine if evidence-based design, the planned design of healthcare facilities, impacts human healing, health, and wellbeing. Methods: A systematic review of selected literature was planned and attempted utilizing PRISMA 27-item check list and four-phase flow diagram. Databases included the Cumulative Index of Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL), Psych INFO produced by the American Psychological Association, and PubMed search engine of the MEDLINE database of references and abstracts from the United States National Library of Medicine at the National Institutes of Health. This exploration included research and literature regarding the design and development of planned healthcare environments that promote healing, health and wellbeing and the consideration of theory that supports the significance of environment in human development. Results: No evidence was found that support the assertion that planned healthcare environments utilizing evidence-based design improve healing, health and well-being. Limited research evidence prohibited organization and reporting using PRISMA. Conclusion: Research should be completed utilizing a design that helps determine if there is a relationship between planned healthcare environments and healing, health, and well-being.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信