稻瘟病菌PH-1缺失突变体产生的分裂标记与双交叉替代方案的相对效率

S. Bec, Gabdiel Yulfo-Soto, L. Vaillancourt
{"title":"稻瘟病菌PH-1缺失突变体产生的分裂标记与双交叉替代方案的相对效率","authors":"S. Bec, Gabdiel Yulfo-Soto, L. Vaillancourt","doi":"10.4148/1941-4765.2175","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The split-marker (SM) protocol has become a popular method for production of knockout mutations in fungi. We used Southern hybridization to compare the performance and efficiency of the SM protocol with the more traditional double-crossover intact marker (IM) method for creating deletions of the mating type genes in Fusarium graminearum. Both methods successfully produced knockouts at a rate of between 24 and 75%: the SM method produced mutants more efficiently for larger constructs (>1 kb), but it was similar to IM for a smaller construct that was 865 bp. Both methods also produced strains with additional ectopic integrations at a similar rate of approximately 10%, but on average the SM produced a higher number of independent integrations in those strains. Ectopic integrations produce off-site mutations, and strains with multiple integrations are less desirable since it is more difficult to remove them by backcrossing. Southern hybridizations will be generally superior to PCR to identify strains with fewer ectopic integrations for experimental purposes.","PeriodicalId":12490,"journal":{"name":"Fungal Genetics Reports","volume":"146 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Relative efficiency of split-marker versus double-crossover replacement protocols for production of deletion mutants in strain PH-1 of Fusarium graminearum\",\"authors\":\"S. Bec, Gabdiel Yulfo-Soto, L. Vaillancourt\",\"doi\":\"10.4148/1941-4765.2175\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The split-marker (SM) protocol has become a popular method for production of knockout mutations in fungi. We used Southern hybridization to compare the performance and efficiency of the SM protocol with the more traditional double-crossover intact marker (IM) method for creating deletions of the mating type genes in Fusarium graminearum. Both methods successfully produced knockouts at a rate of between 24 and 75%: the SM method produced mutants more efficiently for larger constructs (>1 kb), but it was similar to IM for a smaller construct that was 865 bp. Both methods also produced strains with additional ectopic integrations at a similar rate of approximately 10%, but on average the SM produced a higher number of independent integrations in those strains. Ectopic integrations produce off-site mutations, and strains with multiple integrations are less desirable since it is more difficult to remove them by backcrossing. Southern hybridizations will be generally superior to PCR to identify strains with fewer ectopic integrations for experimental purposes.\",\"PeriodicalId\":12490,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Fungal Genetics Reports\",\"volume\":\"146 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Fungal Genetics Reports\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4148/1941-4765.2175\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Fungal Genetics Reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4148/1941-4765.2175","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

分裂标记(SM)方法已成为真菌中产生敲除突变的一种流行方法。我们利用南方杂交技术比较了SM方法与传统的双交叉完整标记(IM)方法在小麦镰刀菌交配型基因缺失上的性能和效率。两种方法的敲除率都在24 - 75%之间:SM方法对较大的构建体(>1 kb)产生的突变体效率更高,但对较小的构建体(865 bp)产生的突变体与IM相似。两种方法也产生了额外异位整合的菌株,其率相似,约为10%,但平均而言,SM在这些菌株中产生了更多的独立整合。异位整合产生场外突变,并且具有多个整合的菌株不太理想,因为通过回交更难以去除它们。南方杂交通常优于PCR,以鉴定具有较少异位整合的菌株用于实验目的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Relative efficiency of split-marker versus double-crossover replacement protocols for production of deletion mutants in strain PH-1 of Fusarium graminearum
The split-marker (SM) protocol has become a popular method for production of knockout mutations in fungi. We used Southern hybridization to compare the performance and efficiency of the SM protocol with the more traditional double-crossover intact marker (IM) method for creating deletions of the mating type genes in Fusarium graminearum. Both methods successfully produced knockouts at a rate of between 24 and 75%: the SM method produced mutants more efficiently for larger constructs (>1 kb), but it was similar to IM for a smaller construct that was 865 bp. Both methods also produced strains with additional ectopic integrations at a similar rate of approximately 10%, but on average the SM produced a higher number of independent integrations in those strains. Ectopic integrations produce off-site mutations, and strains with multiple integrations are less desirable since it is more difficult to remove them by backcrossing. Southern hybridizations will be generally superior to PCR to identify strains with fewer ectopic integrations for experimental purposes.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信