PBL动画课中不同认知风格的学习效果研究

Yuan-Chang Guo, Shi-Jer Lou
{"title":"PBL动画课中不同认知风格的学习效果研究","authors":"Yuan-Chang Guo, Shi-Jer Lou","doi":"10.1109/RVSP.2013.42","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The purpose of this study was to explore different cognitive styles of learning effects in PBL animation courses. This study used qualitative and quantitative research methods mixed in 12-week experimental learning courses. Also the teaching method was designed and based on both problem-based and project-based learning (PBL) approach, providing students with online learning, discussing, and sharing environment. In addition, in the end of course each group will complete a group project. At the beginning of the first class, a standardized test called \"Groups Embedded Figure Test(GEFT)\" was implemented to understand student's cognitive style. During the teaching period, student's learning process was recorded along with teacher's own reflection. The results of this study are as follows: Although no significant differences of learning effects between different cognitive styles, but there is a significant impact on student's work style. Also, the analysis of group projects shows that field-independent students can integrate more strategies in problem solving to complete group project than field-dependent students.","PeriodicalId":6585,"journal":{"name":"2013 Second International Conference on Robot, Vision and Signal Processing","volume":"92 1","pages":"153-156"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-12-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Study of Learning Effects in Different Cognitive Styles in PBL Animation Course\",\"authors\":\"Yuan-Chang Guo, Shi-Jer Lou\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/RVSP.2013.42\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The purpose of this study was to explore different cognitive styles of learning effects in PBL animation courses. This study used qualitative and quantitative research methods mixed in 12-week experimental learning courses. Also the teaching method was designed and based on both problem-based and project-based learning (PBL) approach, providing students with online learning, discussing, and sharing environment. In addition, in the end of course each group will complete a group project. At the beginning of the first class, a standardized test called \\\"Groups Embedded Figure Test(GEFT)\\\" was implemented to understand student's cognitive style. During the teaching period, student's learning process was recorded along with teacher's own reflection. The results of this study are as follows: Although no significant differences of learning effects between different cognitive styles, but there is a significant impact on student's work style. Also, the analysis of group projects shows that field-independent students can integrate more strategies in problem solving to complete group project than field-dependent students.\",\"PeriodicalId\":6585,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2013 Second International Conference on Robot, Vision and Signal Processing\",\"volume\":\"92 1\",\"pages\":\"153-156\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2013-12-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2013 Second International Conference on Robot, Vision and Signal Processing\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/RVSP.2013.42\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2013 Second International Conference on Robot, Vision and Signal Processing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/RVSP.2013.42","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

本研究旨在探讨不同认知风格在PBL动画课程中的学习效果。本研究采用定性与定量相结合的研究方法,在为期12周的实验学习课程中进行。设计了基于PBL (problem-based and project-based learning)的教学方法,为学生提供在线学习、讨论和分享的环境。此外,在课程结束时,每个小组将完成一个小组项目。在第一堂课开始时,我们实施了一个标准化的测试,叫做“小组嵌入图测试”(GEFT),以了解学生的认知风格。在教学过程中,记录了学生的学习过程,同时也记录了教师的反思。本研究的结果如下:虽然不同认知风格之间的学习效果没有显著差异,但对学生的工作风格有显著影响。此外,对小组项目的分析也显示,独立学生比独立学生能够整合更多的问题解决策略来完成小组项目。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A Study of Learning Effects in Different Cognitive Styles in PBL Animation Course
The purpose of this study was to explore different cognitive styles of learning effects in PBL animation courses. This study used qualitative and quantitative research methods mixed in 12-week experimental learning courses. Also the teaching method was designed and based on both problem-based and project-based learning (PBL) approach, providing students with online learning, discussing, and sharing environment. In addition, in the end of course each group will complete a group project. At the beginning of the first class, a standardized test called "Groups Embedded Figure Test(GEFT)" was implemented to understand student's cognitive style. During the teaching period, student's learning process was recorded along with teacher's own reflection. The results of this study are as follows: Although no significant differences of learning effects between different cognitive styles, but there is a significant impact on student's work style. Also, the analysis of group projects shows that field-independent students can integrate more strategies in problem solving to complete group project than field-dependent students.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信